IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v195y2025ics0148296325002188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One requirement, multiple insights: The impact of innovation job requirement on employee radical and incremental creativity

Author

Listed:
  • Qi, Xin
  • Liu, Xiyao
  • Zhang, Xiaoyan
  • Xia, Yuhuan
  • Liu, Shasha
  • Lin, Hui
  • Wang, Ziyao

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly incorporating innovation into job requirements to encourage employees to generate and implement novel ideas (i.e., enhance employees’ creativity). Despite extensive research on the impact of innovation job requirements on creativity, the findings remain inconsistent, being either positive or negative. To address this issue, drawing on the regulatory focus theory, we focused on employees’ different types of creativity and explored how innovation job requirements impact employees’ radical versus incremental creativity. Through a questionnaire survey of 485 employees and 124 direct supervisors from two high-tech firms and one manufacturing firm in China, the empirical results indicated that innovation job requirements promoted expected image gains for promotion-focused employees, whereas for prevention-focused employees, innovation job requirements fostered incremental creativity by heightening expected image risks. These findings contribute valuable insights to research on innovation job requirements and creativity and provide practical guidance for organizations to foster employees’ different types of creativity.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi, Xin & Liu, Xiyao & Zhang, Xiaoyan & Xia, Yuhuan & Liu, Shasha & Lin, Hui & Wang, Ziyao, 2025. "One requirement, multiple insights: The impact of innovation job requirement on employee radical and incremental creativity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002188
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002188
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.