IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v192y2025ics0148296325001183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loose = fun? How interstitial space in brand logos affects product perception

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Liu, Qianqian
  • He, Dongjin
  • Jiang, Yuwei

Abstract

This research examines how a ubiquitous logo design element—interstitial space—affects consumers’ perceptions of whether a brand’s products are hedonic or utilitarian. Seven preregistered studies demonstrate that consumers are likely to infer a brand’s products to be more hedonic (vs. utilitarian) oriented when the brand has a spacious logo (vs. compact logo). This effect is driven by consumers’ feelings of relaxation, and it can be attenuated when a logo includes a relaxing image. Therefore, consumers have a higher purchase intention toward a brand with a spacious logo (vs. a compact logo) when they have a hedonic shopping goal (vs. a utilitarian shopping goal). Additionally, consumers are more likely to support a hedonic brand changing its logo design from a compact one to a spacious one, but they tend to support a utilitarian brand changing its logo design from a spacious one to a compact one.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Liu, Qianqian & He, Dongjin & Jiang, Yuwei, 2025. "Loose = fun? How interstitial space in brand logos affects product perception," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001183
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001183
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joan Meyers-Levy & Rui (Juliet) Zhu, 2007. "The Influence of Ceiling Height: The Effect of Priming on the Type of Processing That People Use," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(2), pages 174-186, June.
    2. Yann Cornil & Pierrick Gomez & Dimitri Vasiljevic & Vicki G Morwitz & Amna Kirmani & Chris Janiszewski, 2020. "Food as Fuel: Performance Goals Increase the Consumption of High-Calorie Foods at the Expense of Good Nutrition [Joint Position Statement: Nutrition and Athletic Performance. American College of Sp," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 147-166.
    3. Bridges, Eileen & Florsheim, Renée, 2008. "Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 309-314, April.
    4. John W. Pracejus & G. Douglas Olsen & Thomas C. O'Guinn, 2006. "How Nothing Became Something: White Space, Rhetoric, History, and Meaning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 82-90, June.
    5. Shiv, Baba & Fedorikhin, Alexander, 1999. "Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(3), pages 278-292, December.
    6. Strahilevitz, Michal & Myers, John G, 1998. "Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 434-446, March.
    7. Janiszewski, Chris & Meyvis, Tom, 2001. "Effects of Brand Logo Complexity, Repetition, and Spacing on Processing Fluency and Judgment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 18-32, June.
    8. Jonathan Levav & Rui (Juliet) Zhu, 2009. "Seeking Freedom through Variety," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(4), pages 600-610, December.
    9. Yuval Rottenstreich & Sanjay Sood & Lyle Brenner, 2007. "Feeling and Thinking in Memory-Based versus Stimulus-Based Choices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 461-469, December.
    10. Tanvi Gupta & Henrik Hagtvedt & Margaret C Campbell & Chris Janiszewski, 2021. "Safe Together, Vulnerable Apart: How Interstitial Space in Text Logos Impacts Brand Attitudes in Tight versus Loose Cultures," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(3), pages 474-491.
    11. Simona Botti & Ann L. McGill, 2011. "The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(6), pages 1065-1078.
    12. Candi, Marina & Jae, Haeran & Makarem, Suzanne & Mohan, Mayoor, 2017. "Consumer responses to functional, aesthetic and symbolic product design in online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 31-39.
    13. Yuwei Jiang & Gerald J. Gorn & Maria Galli & Amitava Chattopadhyay, 2016. "Does Your Company Have the Right Logo? How and Why Circular- and Angular-Logo Shapes Influence Brand Attribute Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(5), pages 709-726.
    14. Ann Kronrod & Amir Grinstein & Luc Wathieu, 2012. "Enjoy! Hedonic Consumption and Compliance with Assertive Messages," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 51-61.
    15. Scarpi, Daniele, 2012. "Work and Fun on the Internet: The Effects of Utilitarianism and Hedonism Online," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 53-67.
    16. Holbrook, Morris B & Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1982. "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 132-140, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniele Scarpi, 2021. "A construal-level approach to hedonic and utilitarian shopping orientation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 261-271, June.
    2. Mukhopadhyay, Soumya & Vijayalakshmi, Akshaya & Jain, Shailendra P., 2023. "Understanding consumers in-store behavior: The dual role of episode-specific motive adjustment and motive selection," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 460-479.
    3. Meena, Rahul & Sarabhai, Samar, 2023. "Extrinsic and intrinsic motivators for usage continuance of hedonic mobile apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Byun, Jaemun & Jang, SooCheong (Shawn), 2015. "Effective destination advertising: Matching effect between advertising language and destination type," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 31-40.
    5. Akram, Umair & Junaid, Muhammad & Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Li, Zhiwen & Fan, Mingyue, 2021. "Online purchase intention in Chinese social commerce platforms: Being emotional or rational?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. Cong Zhang & Atish P. Sinha & Yang Wang, 2024. "When to Target Customers for Helpful Reviews: The Evolution of Consumers’ Product Evaluations with Product Exposure," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1183-1199, June.
    7. Thomas, Sujo & Jadeja, Ashwin, 2021. "Psychological antecedents of consumer trust in CRM campaigns and donation intentions: The moderating role of creativity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Shiv, Baba & Fedorikhin, Alexander, 2002. "Spontaneous versus Controlled Influences of Stimulus-Based Affect on Choice Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 342-370, March.
    9. Wong, Jimmy & Lalwani, Ashok K. & Wang, Jessie J., 2022. "The interactive effect of power and self-construal on consumers’ preferences for brand-logo size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 279-296.
    10. Qing Yao & Yixuan Han & Defeng Yang, 2024. "Should online reviews include pictures? The impact of fit between product type and online review presentation format," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 49(3), pages 509-527, August.
    11. Xu, Xun & Munson, Charles L. & Zeng, Shuo, 2017. "The impact of e-service offerings on the demand of online customers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 231-244.
    12. Seo, Jinhee & Sung, Yoon Hi & Yoon, Doyle, 2024. "“It doesn't bother me that much”: The congruence effect of product types and ad appeals on the effectiveness of sponsored ads on Instagram," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Didi Alaoui, Mohamed & Valette-Florence, Pierre & Cova, Véronique, 2022. "How psychological distance shapes hedonic consumption: The moderating role of the need to justify," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 57-69.
    14. Isabella, Giuliana & Mazzon, José Afonso & Dimoka, Angelika, 2017. "Impacts of product type and representation type on the perception of justice and price fairness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 203-211.
    15. Kevin L. Sample & Henrik Hagtvedt & S. Adam Brasel, 2020. "Components of visual perception in marketing contexts: a conceptual framework and review," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 405-421, May.
    16. Wongkitrungrueng, Apiradee & Valenzuela, Ana & Sen, Sankar, 2018. "The Cake Looks Yummy on the Shelf up There: The Interactive Effect of Retail Shelf Position and Consumers’ Personal Sense of Power on Indulgent Choice," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 280-295.
    17. Aydinli, Aylin & Lamey, Lien & Millet, Kobe & ter Braak, Anne & Vuegen, Maya, 2021. "How Do Customers Alter Their Basket Composition When They Perceive the Retail Store to Be Crowded? An Empirical Study," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 207-216.
    18. Michael G. Luchs & Minu Kumar, 2017. "“Yes, but this Other One Looks Better/Works Better”: How do Consumers Respond to Trade-offs Between Sustainability and Other Valued Attributes?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 567-584, February.
    19. Ma, Qingguo & He, Yijin & Tan, Yulin & Cheng, Lu & Wang, Manlin, 2024. "Unveiling the Impact of Payment Methods on Consumer Behavior: Insights and Future Directions," OSF Preprints 3fphk, Center for Open Science.
    20. Kim, Hee Jin & Song, Hayeon, 2020. "Effort justification for fun activities?: The effect of location-based mobile coupons using games," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.