IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v189y2025ics0148296325000141.html

What do you want to hear? A self-presentation view of social desirability bias

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander, Katherine C.
  • Mackey, Jeremy D.
  • McAllister, Charn P.
  • Ellen, B. Parker

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to revitalize the study and measurement of social desirability bias in the field so researchers can remedy the methodological ills it was originally meant to address. To improve scholars’ ability to mitigate these concerns, we conduct research that enables us to (1) generate a cohesive and parsimonious theoretical explanation of social desirability bias and (2) develop new measures of social desirability bias that will improve the field’s understanding of its effects. First, we utilize self-presentation theory to explain the differences between social desirability as a trait bias and socially desirable responding as a state bias under the larger social desirability bias umbrella construct. Then, we conduct a 13-sample measure development study to generate new content-valid measures of social desirability and socially desirable responding that can be used to improve the precision and nuance of business research knowledge generation moving forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander, Katherine C. & Mackey, Jeremy D. & McAllister, Charn P. & Ellen, B. Parker, 2025. "What do you want to hear? A self-presentation view of social desirability bias," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:189:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000141
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000141
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire M. Hart & Timothy D. Ritchie & Erica G. Hepper & Jochen E. Gebauer, 2015. "The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16)," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, December.
    2. Ozuna, Edna & Steinhoff, Lena, 2024. "“Look me in the eye, customer”: How do face-to-face interactions in peer-to-peer sharing economy services affect customers’ misbehavior concealment intentions?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Valentine, Sean & Godkin, Lynn, 2019. "Moral intensity, ethical decision making, and whistleblowing intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 277-288.
    4. Wang, Juehui & Chieh Chen, Chih & Shen, Tao & Fan, Fan & Fosh, Patricia & Guo, Yuxuan, 2024. "Family matters! Antecedents and boundary conditions of unethical pro-family behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    5. Zhu, Zheng & Chen, Xingwen & Liu, Jun & Yang, Mengxi & Fan, Xueling, 2022. "Your thanks make me work harder: A multiple identification perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 461-471.
    6. Moon, Sangkil & Bergey, Paul K. & Bove, Liliana L. & Robinson, Stefanie, 2016. "Message framing and individual traits in adopting innovative, sustainable products (ISPs): Evidence from biofuel adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3553-3560.
    7. Rai, Arpana & Kim, Minseo & Singh, Sanjay Kumar, 2023. "Meaningful work from ethics perspective: Examination of ethical antecedents and outcomes of meaningful work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Hough, Leaetta M. & Oswald, Frederick L., 2008. "Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Reflections, Progress, and Prospects," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 272-290, September.
    9. Rabbanee, Fazlul K. & Roy, Rajat & Sharma, Piyush, 2022. "Contextual differences in the moderating effects of price consciousness and social desirability in pay-what-you-want (PWYW) pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 13-25.
    10. Cho, Yoon-Na & Berry, Christopher, 2019. "Understanding the effects of retailer- and manufacturer-provided sustainability labels on product evaluations and purchase-related outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 73-85.
    11. Griffith, Richard L. & Peterson, Mitchell H., 2008. "The Failure of Social Desirability Measures to Capture Applicant Faking Behavior," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 308-311, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bing, Mark N. & Kluemper, Don & Kristl Davison, H. & Taylor, Shannon & Novicevic, Milorad, 2011. "Overclaiming as a measure of faking," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 148-162, September.
    2. Alberto Purpura & Dora Giorgianni & Graziella Orrù & Giulia Melis & Giuseppe Sartori, 2022. "Identifying single-item faked responses in personality tests: A new TF-IDF-based method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Elizabeth Sheedy & Patrick Garcia & Denise Jepsen, 2021. "The Role of Risk Climate and Ethical Self-interest Climate in Predicting Unethical Pro-organisational Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 281-300, October.
    4. Emilie Hennequin, 2023. "Whistleblowing as a Career Crisis: Recovering from Retaliatory Job Loss through a Process of Bifurcation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 545-562, April.
    5. Ignatowski Grzegorz, 2023. "Problems with the Concept of Whistleblowing in the Intercultural Perspective and the EU Directive 2019/1937," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 78-103, June.
    6. Kausel, Edgar E. & Culbertson, Satoris S. & Madrid, Hector P., 2016. "Overconfidence in personnel selection: When and why unstructured interview information can hurt hiring decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 27-44.
    7. Bastos, Wilson, 2020. "“Speaking of Purchases”: How Conversational Potential Determines Consumers' Willingness to Exert Effort for Experiential Versus Material Purchases," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Song, Qi & Guo, Yuxuan & Ren, Qiqi & Ren, Yingwei & Lv, Hui & Ma, Ruotong & Gan, Yujing, 2025. "Energizing, yet tiring: The dual impact of felt trust on employee creativity and work-to-family conflict," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Tancredi Pascucci & Giuseppina Maria Cardella & Brizeida Hernàndez-Sànchez & Jose Carlos Sànchez-Garcìa, 2022. "Environmental Sensitivity to Form a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Petr Houdek & Štěpán Bahník & Marek Hudík & Marek Vranka, 2021. "Selection effects on dishonest behavior," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(2), pages 238-266, March.
    11. Nagel, Christian & Heidenreich, Sven & Schumann, Jan H., 2024. "Enhancing Adoption of Sustainable Product Innovations: Addressing Reduced Performance with Risk-Reducing Product Modifications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Jabeen, Gul & Ahmad, Munir & Zhang, Qingyu, 2021. "Perceived critical factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase renewable generation technologies: Rural-urban heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    13. Aparna Venugopal & Dhirendra Shukla, 2019. "Identifying consumers' engagement with renewable energy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 53-63, January.
    14. Cao, Rong & Yue, Mingyue & Yu, Jianuo & Wang, Feng & Li, Ping, 2025. "Impact of death-related media information on the effectiveness of in-feed advertising: A compensatory consumption perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Mobasseri, Sanaz & Stein, Daniel H. & Carney, Dana R., 2022. "The accurate judgment of social network characteristics in the lab and field using thin slices of the behavioral stream," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Kumaraguru Mahadevan, 2025. "Exploring numerology for businesses: a bold leap of faith," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Khirul Basar Mim & Tunmin (Catherine) Jai & Stacy H. Lee, 2022. "The Influence of Sustainable Positioning on eWOM and Brand Loyalty: Analysis of Credible Sources and Transparency Practices Based on the S-O-R Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Cassidy, Rachel & Das, Smita & Delavallade, Clara & Kipchumba, Elijah & Komba, Julietha, 2024. "Do Men Really Have Greater Socio-Emotional Skills Than Women ? Evidence from Tanzanian Youth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10873, The World Bank.
    19. Peipei Pan & Chris Patel, 2024. "Do Internal Auditors Make Consistent Ethical Judgments in English and Chinese in Reporting Wrongdoing?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(2), pages 433-453, October.
    20. Sheng, Xushan & Zhang, Xiaoling & Huang, Yali & Zhou, Xinyue, 2026. "Going green for Eco or Ego? A meta-analysis of the comparative effects of environmental appeals and personal appeals on pro-environmental outcomes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:189:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.