IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v189y2025ics0148296324006659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pay for individual performance and knowledge sharing: A new explanation based on the nonlinear effect

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Shaorong
  • Pei, Jialiang
  • Nian, Pengxiang
  • Lu, Wenzhu
  • Wu, Sibin

Abstract

The innovation process is inseparable from knowledge sharing. How to stimulate employee knowledge sharing has always been researched by scholars. This study develops a nonlinear research model based on self-determination theory to explore how and when pay for individual performance (PFIP), as a form of extrinsic reward, stimulates employee knowledge sharing. The multiphase and multisource data was collected from 385 employees at 8 Chinese firms to test the hypotheses. The results show that PFIP has an inverted U-shaped effect on employee intrinsic motivation, which in turn influences knowledge sharing. In addition, the indirect curvilinear effect is moderated by core self-evaluation and empowering leadership. The findings are vital for scholars and managers to design and adopt an effective compensation system to encourage knowledge sharing and, consequently, improve knowledge management practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Shaorong & Pei, Jialiang & Nian, Pengxiang & Lu, Wenzhu & Wu, Sibin, 2025. "Pay for individual performance and knowledge sharing: A new explanation based on the nonlinear effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:189:y:2025:i:c:s0148296324006659
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324006659
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Florian Ederer & Gustavo Manso, 2013. "Is Pay for Performance Detrimental to Innovation?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(7), pages 1496-1513, July.
    3. Hau, Yong Sauk & Kim, Byoungsoo & Lee, Heeseok & Kim, Young-Gul, 2013. "The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 356-366.
    4. Daniel G. Bachrach & Hui Wang & Elliot Bendoly & Shuoyang Zhang, 2007. "Importance of Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for Overall Performance Evaluation: Comparing the Role of Task Interdependence in China and the USA," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 3(2), pages 255-276, July.
    5. Bachrach, Daniel G. & Wang, Hui & Bendoly, Elliot & Zhang, Shuoyang, 2007. "Importance of Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for Overall Performance Evaluation: Comparing the Role of Task Interdependence in China and the USA," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 255-276, July.
    6. Insu Cho & Heejun Park & Joseph Kichul Kim, 2015. "The relationship between motivation and information sharing about products and services on Facebook," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 858-868, September.
    7. Pee, L.G. & Lee, J., 2015. "Intrinsically motivating employees’ online knowledge sharing: Understanding the effects of job design," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 679-690.
    8. Jing Du & Jin Nam Choi, 2010. "Pay for performance in emerging markets: Insights from China," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(4), pages 671-689, May.
    9. Donnelly, Rory, 2019. "Aligning knowledge sharing interventions with the promotion of firm success: The need for SHRM to balance tensions and challenges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 344-352.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Guiling & Siti Aisyah Panatik & Mohammad Saipol Mohd Sukor & Noraini Rusbadrol & Li Cunlin, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior From 2000 to 2019," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    2. Jared Rubin & Anya Samek & Roman M. Sheremeta, 2018. "Loss aversion and the quantity–quality tradeoff," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 21(2), pages 292-315, June.
    3. Lucia Marchegiani & Tommaso Reggiani & Matteo Rizzolli, 2013. "Severity vs. Leniency Bias in Performance Appraisal: Experimental evidence," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS01, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    4. Liying Huang & Lerong He & Guangqing Yang, 2021. "Performance Shortfalls and R&D Investment Change: Aspirations, Actions, and Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Zhen Chen & Zixin Tang, 2024. "The effect of caring ethical climate on employees’ knowledge-hiding behavior: evidence from Chinese construction firms," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Chowdhury, Dhiman, 2015. "Deviant Citizenship Behavior: A Comprehensive Framework towards Behavioral Excellence in Organizations," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 13-26.
    7. Yaroslav Rosokha & Kenneth Younge, 2020. "Motivating Innovation: The Effect of Loss Aversion on the Willingness to Persist," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(3), pages 569-582, July.
    8. Bachrach, Daniel G. & Rapp, Tammy L. & Ogilvie, Jessica & Rapp, Adam A., 2024. "It’s about time (management)!: Role overload as a bridge explaining relationships between helping, voice, and objective sales performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    9. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.
    10. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.
    11. Philippe Fevrier & Sebastien Gay, 2005. "Informed Consent Versus Presumed Consent The Role of the Family in Organ Donations," HEW 0509007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Shuang Yao & Donghua Yu & Yan Song & Hao Yao & Yuzhen Hu & Benhai Guo, 2018. "Dry Bulk Carrier Investment Selection through a Dual Group Decision Fusing Mechanism in the Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Senik, Claudia, 2009. "Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 408-424, October.
    14. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ballester, 2009. "A theory of reference-dependent behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(3), pages 427-455, September.
    15. Shoji, Isao & Kanehiro, Sumei, 2016. "Disposition effect as a behavioral trading activity elicited by investors' different risk preferences," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    16. Christoph Engel & Michael Kurschilgen, 2011. "Fairness Ex Ante and Ex Post: Experimentally Testing Ex Post Judicial Intervention into Blockbuster Deals," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 682-708, December.
    17. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    18. Boone, Jan & Sadrieh, Abdolkarim & van Ours, Jan C., 2009. "Experiments on unemployment benefit sanctions and job search behavior," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 937-951, November.
    19. Singal, Vijay & Xu, Zhaojin, 2011. "Selling winners, holding losers: Effect on fund flows and survival of disposition-prone mutual funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 2704-2718, October.
    20. Jos'e Cl'audio do Nascimento, 2019. "Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation," Papers 1908.01709, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J33 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods
    • L29 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Other
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:189:y:2025:i:c:s0148296324006659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.