IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v130y2021icp159-169.html

Why and how predators pick prey: Followers’ personality and performance as predictors of destructive leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Mackey, Jeremy D.

Abstract

Our limited knowledge about destructive leadership has created an incomplete understanding of why destructive leaders target certain followers. I use the perpetrator predation paradigm to explain why destructive leaders prey on certain followers based on features of followers’ personality and performance. Then, I use meta-analytic data to empirically examine the extent to which predatory destructive leaders rely on followers’ personality versus performance, as well as the sub-facets of each. The relative weight results demonstrate that destructive leaders rely more on followers’ performance than personality (i.e., 92.11% of the explained variance versus 7.89%). Further, the results demonstrate that followers’ counterproductive work behaviors directed toward individuals and organizations account for the majority (i.e., 74.83%) of the variance explained by 10 sub-facets of followers’ personality and performance (R2 = 0.19). Overall, I theoretically argue why and empirically demonstrate how destructive leaders use followers’ personality and performance as they prey on certain followers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mackey, Jeremy D., 2021. "Why and how predators pick prey: Followers’ personality and performance as predictors of destructive leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 159-169.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:130:y:2021:i:c:p:159-169
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321001557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio & García-Lillo, Francisco, 2018. "High performance work system and performance: Opening the black box through the organizational ambidexterity and human resource flexibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 397-406.
    2. Selvarajan, T.T. & Singh, Barjinder & Solansky, Stephanie, 2018. "Performance appraisal fairness, leader member exchange and motivation to improve performance: A study of US and Mexican employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 142-154.
    3. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    4. Hughes-Morgan, Margaret & Kolev, Kalin & Mcnamara, Gerry, 2018. "A meta-analytic review of competitive aggressiveness research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 73-82.
    5. Cortina, Lilia M. & Rabelo, Verónica Caridad & Holland, Kathryn J., 2018. "Beyond Blaming the Victim: Toward a More Progressive Understanding of Workplace Mistreatment," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 81-100, March.
    6. Rauch, Andreas & Rosenbusch, Nina & Unger, Jens & Frese, Michael, 2016. "The effectiveness of cohesive and diversified networks: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 554-568.
    7. Yucheng Zhang & Timothy C. Bednall, 2016. "Antecedents of Abusive Supervision: a Meta-analytic Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 455-471, December.
    8. Iqbal, Muhammad Zahid & Akbar, Saeed & Budhwar, Pawan & Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali, 2019. "Effectiveness of performance appraisal: Evidence on the utilization criteria," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 285-299.
    9. Aguinis, Herman & Banks, George C. & Rogelberg, Steven G. & Cascio, Wayne F., 2020. "Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 27-35.
    10. James G. Combs & T. Russell Crook & Andreas Rauch, 2019. "Meta‐Analytic Research in Management: Contemporary Approaches, Unresolved Controversies, and Rising Standards," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yijiao Ye & Long-Zeng Wu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xinyu Liu, 2025. "From Deception to Rejection: Unraveling the Impact of Workplace Cheating Behavior on Coworker Ostracism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 157-173, August.
    2. Liden, Robert C. & Wang, Xing & Wang, Yue, 2025. "The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Ellen, B. Parker & Mackey, Jeremy D. & McAllister, Charn P. & Mercer, Ian S., 2022. "Are small measures big problems? A meta-analytic investigation of brief measures of the Big Five," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 579-592.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mackey, Jeremy D. & Parker Ellen, B. & McAllister, Charn P. & Alexander, Katherine C., 2021. "The dark side of leadership: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 705-718.
    2. Scheuer, Luca Joachim & Thaler, Julia, 2023. "How do dynamic capabilities affect performance? A systematic review of mediators," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 914-931.
    3. Ellen, B. Parker & Mackey, Jeremy D. & McAllister, Charn P. & Mercer, Ian S., 2022. "Are small measures big problems? A meta-analytic investigation of brief measures of the Big Five," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 579-592.
    4. Alexander Flaig & Daniel Kindström & Mikael Ottosson, 2021. "Market-shaping phases—a qualitative meta-analysis and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 354-374, December.
    5. Malisić, Bojana & Tinaj, Sandra & Popović, Jovana & Lukovac, Lidija & Vlačić, Božidar, 2025. "Internal dynamics and innovation: A cross-disciplinary review and future research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Montijn Ven & Paola Lara Machado & Alexia Athanasopoulou & Banu Aysolmaz & Oktay Turetken, 2023. "Key performance indicators for business models: a systematic review and catalog," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 753-794, September.
    7. Fikresus Amahazion, 2022. "Dragon Meets Camel: An Exploration of China’s Engagement with Eritrea," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 12(4), pages 59-85.
    8. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Francesco Scarpa & Silvana Signori, 2023. "Understanding corporate tax responsibility: a systematic literature review," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(7), pages 179-201, June.
    10. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    11. Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Dev, Dhairya, 2025. "Crude oil Price forecasting: Leveraging machine learning for global economic stability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Eusebius Pantja Pramudya & Lukas Rumboko Wibowo & Fitri Nurfatriani & Iman Kasiman Nawireja & Dewi Ratna Kurniasari & Sakti Hutabarat & Yohanes Berenika Kadarusman & Ananda Oemi Iswardhani & Rukaiyah , 2022. "Incentives for Palm Oil Smallholders in Mandatory Certification in Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Chen, Xiaomei & Wu, Xiaojie & Wang, Xiuqiong, 2025. "Looking into the past and forward: Antecedents, processes, and consequences of organizational category formation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    14. Peter Schnell & Phillip Haag & Hans Christian Jünger, 2022. "Implementation of Digital Technologies in Construction Companies: Establishing a Holistic Process which Addresses Current Barriers," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Yang, Zijing & Liu, Songsong, 2025. "Fairness-oriented multi-objective optimization of supply chain planning under uncertainties," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Ganesh Narkhede & Vishwas Dohale & Yash Mahajan, 2024. "Darker side of industry 4.0 and its impact on triple‐bottom‐line sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 5999-6016, December.
    17. Ivana Cukor Kirinić & Miro Hegedić, 2023. "Trends and Future Research Direction of Lean Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Andolfi, Laura & Lima Baima, Renan & Burcheri, Lorenzo Matthias & Pavić, Ivan & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2025. "Sociotechnical design of building energy management systems in the public sector: Five design principles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
    19. Oğuzhan Öztürk & Rıdvan Kocaman & Dominik K. Kanbach, 2024. "How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3333-3361, November.
    20. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:130:y:2021:i:c:p:159-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.