IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v130y2021icp159-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why and how predators pick prey: Followers’ personality and performance as predictors of destructive leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Mackey, Jeremy D.

Abstract

Our limited knowledge about destructive leadership has created an incomplete understanding of why destructive leaders target certain followers. I use the perpetrator predation paradigm to explain why destructive leaders prey on certain followers based on features of followers’ personality and performance. Then, I use meta-analytic data to empirically examine the extent to which predatory destructive leaders rely on followers’ personality versus performance, as well as the sub-facets of each. The relative weight results demonstrate that destructive leaders rely more on followers’ performance than personality (i.e., 92.11% of the explained variance versus 7.89%). Further, the results demonstrate that followers’ counterproductive work behaviors directed toward individuals and organizations account for the majority (i.e., 74.83%) of the variance explained by 10 sub-facets of followers’ personality and performance (R2 = 0.19). Overall, I theoretically argue why and empirically demonstrate how destructive leaders use followers’ personality and performance as they prey on certain followers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mackey, Jeremy D., 2021. "Why and how predators pick prey: Followers’ personality and performance as predictors of destructive leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 159-169.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:130:y:2021:i:c:p:159-169
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321001557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio & García-Lillo, Francisco, 2018. "High performance work system and performance: Opening the black box through the organizational ambidexterity and human resource flexibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 397-406.
    2. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    3. Rauch, Andreas & Rosenbusch, Nina & Unger, Jens & Frese, Michael, 2016. "The effectiveness of cohesive and diversified networks: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 554-568.
    4. Aguinis, Herman & Banks, George C. & Rogelberg, Steven G. & Cascio, Wayne F., 2020. "Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 27-35.
    5. Selvarajan, T.T. & Singh, Barjinder & Solansky, Stephanie, 2018. "Performance appraisal fairness, leader member exchange and motivation to improve performance: A study of US and Mexican employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 142-154.
    6. Yucheng Zhang & Timothy C. Bednall, 2016. "Antecedents of Abusive Supervision: a Meta-analytic Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 455-471, December.
    7. Hughes-Morgan, Margaret & Kolev, Kalin & Mcnamara, Gerry, 2018. "A meta-analytic review of competitive aggressiveness research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 73-82.
    8. Cortina, Lilia M. & Rabelo, Verónica Caridad & Holland, Kathryn J., 2018. "Beyond Blaming the Victim: Toward a More Progressive Understanding of Workplace Mistreatment," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 81-100, March.
    9. Iqbal, Muhammad Zahid & Akbar, Saeed & Budhwar, Pawan & Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali, 2019. "Effectiveness of performance appraisal: Evidence on the utilization criteria," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 285-299.
    10. James G. Combs & T. Russell Crook & Andreas Rauch, 2019. "Meta‐Analytic Research in Management: Contemporary Approaches, Unresolved Controversies, and Rising Standards," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellen, B. Parker & Mackey, Jeremy D. & McAllister, Charn P. & Mercer, Ian S., 2022. "Are small measures big problems? A meta-analytic investigation of brief measures of the Big Five," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 579-592.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mackey, Jeremy D. & Parker Ellen, B. & McAllister, Charn P. & Alexander, Katherine C., 2021. "The dark side of leadership: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 705-718.
    2. Ellen, B. Parker & Mackey, Jeremy D. & McAllister, Charn P. & Mercer, Ian S., 2022. "Are small measures big problems? A meta-analytic investigation of brief measures of the Big Five," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 579-592.
    3. Alexander Flaig & Daniel Kindström & Mikael Ottosson, 2021. "Market-shaping phases—a qualitative meta-analysis and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 354-374, December.
    4. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Peter Schnell & Phillip Haag & Hans Christian Jünger, 2022. "Implementation of Digital Technologies in Construction Companies: Establishing a Holistic Process which Addresses Current Barriers," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    7. Hongxia Jin & Lu Lu & Haojun Fan, 2022. "Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Amal Almansour & Reem Alotaibi & Hajar Alharbi, 2022. "Text-rating review discrepancy (TRRD): an integrative review and implications for research," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Švarc, Jadranka & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Piers Steel & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Herman Aguinis, 2021. "The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 23-44, February.
    11. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Alexander Salmen, 2021. "New Product Launch Success: A Literature Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 69(1), pages 151-176.
    13. Halim Lee & Jaewon Son & Dayoon Joo & Jinhyeok Ha & Seongreal Yun & Chul-Hee Lim & Woo-Kyun Lee, 2020. "Sustainable Water Security Based on the SDG Framework: A Case Study of the 2019 Metro Manila Water Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Del Vecchio, Pasquale & Secundo, Giustina & Garzoni, Antonello, 2023. "Phygital technologies and environments for breakthrough innovation in customers' and citizens' journey. A critical literature review and future agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. Pina Puntillo & Carmela Gulluscio & Donald Huisingh & Stefania Veltri, 2021. "Reevaluating waste as a resource under a circular economy approach from a system perspective: Findings from a case study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 968-984, February.
    16. Heleen Dreyer & Nadine Sonnenberg & Daleen Van der Merwe, 2022. "Transcending Linearity in Understanding Green Consumer Behaviour: A Social–Cognitive Framework for Behaviour Changes in an Emerging Economy Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    18. Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Fulvio Signore & Maria Chiara De Lorenzi, 2023. "The Potential of Gamification for Social Sustainability: Meaning and Purposes in Agri-Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Ajjima Jiravichai & Ruth Banomyong, 2022. "A Proposed Methodology for Literature Review on Operational Risk Management in Banks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Kusha Sharma & Dr. Madhuri Hooda, 2023. "The New Elective of National Cadet Corps (NCC): A Review of Literature," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 384-396, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:130:y:2021:i:c:p:159-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.