IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v18y2024i4s1751157724001019.html

How does policy information shape its adoption? A citation analysis of large-scale energy policies in China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Leilei
  • Ba, Zhichao
  • Pei, Lei

Abstract

Understanding the antecedents of policy adoption is essential for facilitating policy diffusion and designing follow-up policies. Previous research on drivers of policy adoption primarily focused on local attributes and government interactions, often neglecting the influence of the policy information itself. This study systematically investigates how policy information (policy design, topics, and attributes) shapes its adoption. Drawing on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), we developed a framework to explain how such policy information embedded in policy documents influences policy adoption through central and peripheral routes. The adoption performance of each policy is quantified based on a novel policy citation approach. An empirical analysis of large-scale energy policies in China demonstrates that differentiated policy designs and topics exert heterogeneous effects on the intensity and speed of policy adoption. Moreover, their impact on subsequent policy adoptions is more pronounced than on first-time policy adoptions. Policy attributes such as institutional collaboration, reasonable timing agendas, and referencing high-impact policies positively influence policy adoption performance. Additionally, the validity level of a policy positively moderates the relationship between content information and adoption performance. Our research provides practical implications for policymakers to strategically craft appropriate policy-making and targeted promotion strategies for effective policy diffusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Leilei & Ba, Zhichao & Pei, Lei, 2024. "How does policy information shape its adoption? A citation analysis of large-scale energy policies in China," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:4:s1751157724001019
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2024.101589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724001019
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schneider, Anne & Ingram, Helen, 1993. "Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(2), pages 334-347, June.
    2. Chao Zhang & Jiancheng Guan, 2022. "How policies emerge and interact with each other? A bibliometric analysis of policies in China," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 441-459.
    3. Guilhot, Laëtitia, 2022. "An analysis of China's energy policy from 1981 to 2020: Transitioning towards to a diversified and low-carbon energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Rissman, Adena R. & Kohl, Patrice A. & Wardropper, Chloe B., 2017. "Public support for carrot, stick, and no-government water quality policies," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 82-89.
    5. Volden, Craig & Ting, Michael M. & Carpenter, Daniel P., 2008. "A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 102(3), pages 319-332, August.
    6. Kar Yan Tam & Shuk Ying Ho, 2005. "Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 271-291, September.
    7. Pierson, Paul, 2000. "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(2), pages 251-267, June.
    8. repec:cup:apsrev:v:63:y:1969:i:03:p:880-899_25 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Kong, Yuan & Feng, Chao & Yang, Jun, 2020. "How does China manage its energy market? A perspective of policy evolution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Yang, Chao & Huang, Cui, 2022. "Quantitative mapping of the evolution of AI policy distribution, targets and focuses over three decades in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Charles R. Shipan & Craig Volden, 2008. "The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 840-857, October.
    12. Marissa J Smith & Andrew J Baxter & Kathryn Skivington & Mark McCann & Shona Hilton & Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, 2021. "Examining the sources of evidence in e-cigarette policy recommendations: A citation network analysis of international public health recommendations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Liu, Dandan & Wang, Delu, 2022. "Evaluation of the synergy degree of industrial de-capacity policies based on text mining: A case study of China's coal industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Wang, Jiaxi & Zhang, Jingjing, 2023. "The impact of policy collaboration networks and policy topic networks on policy diffusion: Empirical evidence from the energy field," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Youlang Zhang & Xufeng Zhu, 2019. "Multiple mechanisms of policy diffusion in China," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 495-514, April.
    16. Graham, Erin R. & Shipan, Charles R. & Volden, Craig, 2013. "The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 673-701, July.
    17. Huang, Shengzhi & Huang, Yong & Bu, Yi & Luo, Zhuoran & Lu, Wei, 2023. "Disclosing the interactive mechanism behind scientists’ topic selection behavior from the perspective of the productivity and the impact," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    18. Oosthuizen, A.M. & Inglesi-Lotz, R., 2022. "The impact of policy priority flexibility on the speed of renewable energy adoption," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 426-438.
    19. Xie, Yundong & Wu, Qiang & Wang, Yezhu & Hou, Li & Liu, Yuanyuan, 2024. "Does the handling time of scientific papers relate to their academic impact and social attention? Evidence from Nature, Science, and PNAS," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    20. Cui Huang & Xiaoxu Yue & Mengqu Yang & Jun Su & Jing Chen, 2017. "A quantitative study on the diffusion of public policy in China: evidence from the S&T finance sector," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 235-254, July.
    21. Emma Ejelöv & Andreas Nilsson, 2020. "Individual Factors Influencing Acceptability for Environmental Policies: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    22. Rogge, Karoline S. & Reichardt, Kristin, 2016. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1620-1635.
    23. Marlene Kammerer & Chandreyee Namhata, 2018. "What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 477-513, December.
    24. Ba, Zhichao & Ma, Yaxue & Cai, Jinyao & Li, Gang, 2023. "A citation-based research framework for exploring policy diffusion: Evidence from China's new energy policies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    25. Angel Hsu & Jonas Tan & Yi Ming Ng & Wayne Toh & Regina Vanda & Nihit Goyal, 2020. "Performance determinants show European cities are delivering on climate mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(11), pages 1015-1022, November.
    26. Laëtitia Guilhot, 2022. "An analysis of China's energy policy from 1981 to 2020: Transitioning towards to a diversified and low-carbon energy system," Post-Print halshs-03548757, HAL.
    27. repec:cup:apsrev:v:63:y:1969:i:03:p:880-899_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    28. Ishani Mukherjee & M. Kerem Coban & Azad Singh Bali, 2021. "Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(2), pages 243-268, June.
    29. Yan Yan & Jiatao Li & Jingjing Zhang, 2022. "Protecting intellectual property in foreign subsidiaries: An internal network defense perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 1924-1944, December.
    30. Kallbekken, Steffen & Sælen, Håkon, 2011. "Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2966-2973, May.
    31. Schmidt, Tobias S. & Sewerin, Sebastian, 2019. "Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes – An empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    32. Pamela J. Clouser McCann & Charles R. Shipan & Craig Volden, 2015. "Top-Down Federalism: State Policy Responses to National Government Discussions," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 45(4), pages 495-525.
    33. Cia Alves, Elia Elisa & Steiner, Andrea & de Almeida Medeiros, Marcelo & da Silva, Marcelo Eduardo Alves, 2019. "From a breeze to the four winds: A panel analysis of the international diffusion of renewable energy incentive policies (2005–2015)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 317-329.
    34. Sun, Yutao & Cao, Cong, 2018. "The evolving relations between government agencies of innovation policymaking in emerging economies: A policy network approach and its application to the Chinese case," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 592-605.
    35. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Werner Marx, 2016. "Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1477-1495, December.
    36. Fan, Lingxu & Guo, Lei & Wang, Xinhua & Xu, Liancheng & Liu, Fangai, 2022. "Does the author’s collaboration mode lead to papers’ different citation impacts? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xin Duan & Yuefen Wang, 2025. "A Study on the Impact of Local Policy Response on the Technological Innovation of the New Energy Vehicle Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ba, Zhichao & Ma, Yaxue & Cai, Jinyao & Li, Gang, 2023. "A citation-based research framework for exploring policy diffusion: Evidence from China's new energy policies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Haupt, Wolfgang & Eckersley, Peter & Kern, Kristine, 2021. "Transfer und Skalierung von lokaler Klimapolitik: Konzeptionelle Ansätze, Voraussetzungen und Potenziale," IRS Dialog 1/2021, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    3. Wang, Jiaxi & Zhang, Jingjing, 2023. "The impact of policy collaboration networks and policy topic networks on policy diffusion: Empirical evidence from the energy field," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    4. Meng, Jia-Hui & Wang, Jian, 2023. "The policy trajectory of dual-use technology integration governance in China: A sequential analysis of policy evolution," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Youlang Zhang & Hongshan Yang, 2023. "Bureaucratic politics, innovation compatibility, and the dynamic diffusion of subnational decentralization reforms in China," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(4), pages 553-572, July.
    6. Chao Yang & Cui Huang, 2024. "Target-oriented policy diffusion analysis: a case study of China’s information technology policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(3), pages 1347-1376, March.
    7. Ye, Anping & Hu, Yu-Jie & Tang, Bao-Jun & Wang, Ting & Tao, Yao, 2026. "Optimizing economy-energy-environment (3Es) policy mixes for decarbonization: Synergies, trade-offs, and regional implementation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Xu, Yanshen & Long, Zijian & Fan, Xu, 2026. "Unveiling synergy in China’s new energy vehicle policies: A comprehensive text mining-based quantitative analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Peter John, 2018. "Theories of policy change and variation reconsidered: a prospectus for the political economy of public policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(1), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Labhard, Vincent & Lehtimäki, Jonne, 2025. "Climate change policies and technologies: diffusion and interaction with institutions and governance," Working Paper Series 3027, European Central Bank.
    11. Chen, Jinglong & Wang, Dandan & Wang, Qinqin & Cai, Qiran, 2024. "Quantifying the synergy of China's carbon neutrality policies through policy documents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Sun, Yutao & Jiang, Lin & Cao, Cong, 2025. "Multiple proximities and inter-agency collaboration within a policy network: The case of innovation policymaking in China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Guri Bang, 2021. "The United States: conditions for accelerating decarbonisation in a politically divided country," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 43-58, March.
    14. Liam Fullbrook & Joanna Vince, 2026. "Policy fit: lessons from ocean governance in Australia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 59(1), pages 23-51, March.
    15. Xiangning Chen & Yahua Wang, 2024. "Pioneer advantage or late-mover advantage? An examination of the interplay between policy diffusion sequence and policy outcomes," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(4), pages 851-873, December.
    16. Anmol Soni & Justina Jose & Gordon A. Kingsley, 2023. "When cities take control: Explaining the diversity of complex local climate actions," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1026-1057, November.
    17. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    18. Moshe Maor, 2025. "Towards a theory of policy bubbles," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(2), pages 403-424, June.
    19. Giliberto Capano & Andrea Lippi, 2017. "How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 269-293, June.
    20. Yan Zhao & Ruiqian Li & Guangyue Gao, 2025. "Policy Analysis of Environmental Governance in the Bohai Rim Region (2001–2021)—A Perspective Based on the Vertical Synergy of Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:4:s1751157724001019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.