IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v14y2020i4s1751157720301991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The pace of artificial intelligence innovations: Speed, talent, and trial-and-error

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Xuli
  • Li, Xin
  • Ding, Ying
  • Song, Min
  • Bu, Yi

Abstract

Innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) are occurring at speeds faster than ever witnessed before. However, few studies have managed to measure or depict this increasing velocity of innovations in the field of AI. In this paper, we combine data on AI from arXiv and Semantic Scholar to explore the pace of AI innovations from three perspectives: AI publications, AI players, and AI updates (trial and error). A research framework and three novel indicators, Average Time Interval (ATI), Innovation Speed (IS) and Update Speed (US), are proposed to measure the pace of innovations in the field of AI. The results show that: (1) in 2019, more than 3 AI preprints were submitted to arXiv per hour, over 148 times faster than in 1994. Furthermore, there was one deep learning–related preprint submitted to arXiv every 0.87 h in 2019, over 1064 times faster than in 1994. (2) For AI players, 5.26 new researchers entered into the field of AI each hour in 2019, more than 175 times faster than in the 1990s. (3) As for AI updates (trial and error), one updated AI preprint was submitted to arXiv every 41 days, with around 33 % of AI preprints having been updated at least twice in 2019. In addition, as reported in 2019, it took, on average, only around 0.2 year for AI preprints to receive their first citations, which is 5 times faster than 2000–2007. This swift pace in AI illustrates the increase in popularity of AI innovation. The systematic and fine-grained analysis of the AI field enabled to portrait the pace of AI innovation and demonstrated that the proposed approach can be adopted to understand other fast-growing fields such as cancer research and nano science.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Xuli & Li, Xin & Ding, Ying & Song, Min & Bu, Yi, 2020. "The pace of artificial intelligence innovations: Speed, talent, and trial-and-error," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:4:s1751157720301991
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157720301991
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Azoulay & Joshua S. Graff Zivin & Gustavo Manso, 2011. "Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 42(3), pages 527-554, September.
    2. Chen, Chung-Jen & Huang, Jing-Wen, 2009. "Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance -- The mediating role of knowledge management capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 104-114, January.
    3. Jones, Charles I, 1995. "R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(4), pages 759-784, August.
    4. Dushnitsky, Gary & Lenox, Michael J., 2005. "When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 615-639, June.
    5. Yujia Zhai & Ying Ding & Fang Wang, 2018. "Measuring the diffusion of an innovation: A citation analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(3), pages 368-379, March.
    6. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    7. Jinseok Kim, 2019. "Author‐based analysis of conference versus journal publication in computer science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(1), pages 71-82, January.
    8. Christopher Allen & David M A Mehler, 2019. "Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, May.
    9. James B. Heaton & Nicholas Polson & Jan H. Witte, 2017. "Rejoinder to ‘Deep learning for finance: deep portfolios’," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 19-21, January.
    10. Jialiang Lin & Yao Yu & Yu Zhou & Zhiyang Zhou & Xiaodong Shi, 2020. "How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXiv," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 555-574, July.
    11. Fernandez Donoso, Jose, 2017. "A simple index of innovation with complexity," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17.
    12. Dag W. Aksnes & Liv Langfeldt & Paul Wouters, 2019. "Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, February.
    13. Tim Brody & Stevan Harnad & Leslie Carr, 2006. "Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(8), pages 1060-1072, June.
    14. Steven Callander & Niko Matouschek, 2019. "The Risk of Failure: Trial and Error Learning and Long-Run Performance," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 44-78, February.
    15. J. B. Heaton & N. G. Polson & J. H. Witte, 2017. "Deep learning for finance: deep portfolios," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 3-12, January.
    16. Wang, Jian & Hicks, Diana, 2015. "Scientific teams: Self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 197-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ameeth Sooklall & Jean Vincent Fonou-Dombeu, 2022. "An Enhanced ELECTRE II Method for Multi-Attribute Ontology Ranking with Z-Numbers and Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-36, September.
    2. Xuli Tang & Xin Li & Feicheng Ma, 2022. "Internationalizing AI: evolution and impact of distance factors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 181-205, January.
    3. Yong Qin & Zeshui Xu & Xinxin Wang & Marinko Skare, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Economic Development: An Evolutionary Investigation and Systematic Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1736-1770, March.
    4. Li, Xin & Tang, Xuli & Cheng, Qikai, 2022. "Predicting the clinical citation count of biomedical papers using multilayer perceptron neural network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    5. Jinqing Yang & Zhifeng Liu & Yong Huang, 2024. "From informal to formal: scientific knowledge role transition prediction," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(8), pages 4909-4935, August.
    6. Benedetta Montanaro & Annalisa Croce & Elisa Ughetto, 2024. "Venture capital investments in artificial intelligence," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Hajibabaei, Anahita & Schiffauerova, Andrea & Ebadi, Ashkan, 2022. "Gender-specific patterns in the artificial intelligence scientific ecosystem," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henry M. H. Chan & Vincent W. S. Cho, 2022. "An Empirical Study: The Impact of Collaborative Communications on New Product Creativity That Contributes to New Product Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Zhang, Yanyi & De Smedt, Johannes, 2024. "Index tracking using shapley additive explanations and one-dimensional pointwise convolutional autoencoders," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
    3. Sang Il Lee & Seong Joon Yoo, 2019. "Multimodal Deep Learning for Finance: Integrating and Forecasting International Stock Markets," Papers 1903.06478, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    4. Jinyang Li, 2024. "A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework For Financial Portfolio Management," Papers 2409.08426, arXiv.org.
    5. Chengyu Liu & Yan Li & Mingjie Fang & Feng Liu, 2023. "Using machine learning to explore the determinants of service satisfaction with online healthcare platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(2), pages 449-476, June.
    6. Vitor Azevedo & Christopher Hoegner, 2023. "Enhancing stock market anomalies with machine learning," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 195-230, January.
    7. Guo, Liying & Wang, Yang & Li, Meiling, 2024. "Exploration, exploitation and funding success: Evidence from junior scientists supported by the Chinese Young Scientists Fund," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    8. Ben Moews & Gbenga Ibikunle, 2020. "Predictive intraday correlations in stable and volatile market environments: Evidence from deep learning," Papers 2002.10385, arXiv.org.
    9. Kolesnikova, A. & Yang, Y. & Lessmann, S. & Ma, T. & Sung, M.-C. & Johnson, J.E.V., 2019. "Can Deep Learning Predict Risky Retail Investors? A Case Study in Financial Risk Behavior Forecasting," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2019-023, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    10. Caldeira, João F. & Santos, André A.P. & Torrent, Hudson S., 2023. "Semiparametric portfolios: Improving portfolio performance by exploiting non-linearities in firm characteristics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Moews, Ben & Ibikunle, Gbenga, 2020. "Predictive intraday correlations in stable and volatile market environments: Evidence from deep learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    12. Doron Avramov & Si Cheng & Lior Metzker, 2023. "Machine Learning vs. Economic Restrictions: Evidence from Stock Return Predictability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2587-2619, May.
    13. Li, Weiping & Mei, Feng, 2020. "Asset returns in deep learning methods: An empirical analysis on SSE 50 and CSI 300," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Eric Benhamou & David Saltiel & Serge Tabachnik & Sui Kai Wong & François Chareyron, 2021. "Distinguish the indistinguishable: a Deep Reinforcement Learning approach for volatility targeting models," Working Papers hal-03202431, HAL.
    15. Benkraiem, Ramzi & Dubocage, Emmanuelle & Lelong, Yann & Shuwaikh, Fatima, 2023. "The effects of environmental performance and green innovation on corporate venture capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    16. Flori, Andrea & Regoli, Daniele, 2021. "Revealing Pairs-trading opportunities with long short-term memory networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 772-791.
    17. Zahra Pourahmadi & Dariush Fareed & Hamid Reza Mirzaei, 2024. "A Novel Stock Trading Model based on Reinforcement Learning and Technical Analysis," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 1653-1674, October.
    18. Jiang, Kangqi & Du, Xinyi & Chen, Zhongfei, 2022. "Firms' digitalization and stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Weijia Peng & Chun Yao, 2023. "Sector-level equity returns predictability with machine learning and market contagion measure," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 1761-1798, October.
    20. Rubesam, Alexandre, 2022. "Machine learning portfolios with equal risk contributions: Evidence from the Brazilian market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:4:s1751157720301991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.