IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v138y2023ics0168851023002051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility of introducing effective alcohol harms reduction strategies in a low regulation region: A qualitative study from Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Jiazhou
  • Dong, Dong
  • Sumerlin, Timothy S.
  • Kim, Jean H.

Abstract

To counter the harms of excessive alcohol use, the World Health Organization (WHO) outlined a series of alcohol policy recommendations, including the most cost-effective “Best Buys”. This study aims to obtain key stakeholder views on feasibility of implementing various publicly endorsed alcohol policies in Hong Kong, a relatively low alcohol consumption region with few extant alcohol regulations. Between 2019 and 2021, we conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in alcohol policy adoption and implementation. Interviewees included hospitality/alcohol sales workers (n = 13) and government officers (n = 4). The stakeholders noted that although WHO advocacy facilitated local policy considerations, the adoption of stringent measures was challenged by low political priority due to the low visibility of harms. For implementing strategies, the stakeholders cited alignment with social norms as a major facilitator, whereas law enforcement difficulties and resistance from industry/business sectors were viewed as major obstacles. There was a general belief that population-level alcohol policies would be effective for certain groups of drinkers but would also harm the local economy and detract from Hong Kong's image as a “world city”. Hong Kong may not be ready to adopt a wide range of highly restrictive population-level alcohol policies. Local governments should carefully consider contextual factors when following international recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Jiazhou & Dong, Dong & Sumerlin, Timothy S. & Kim, Jean H., 2023. "Feasibility of introducing effective alcohol harms reduction strategies in a low regulation region: A qualitative study from Hong Kong," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:138:y:2023:i:c:s0168851023002051
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851023002051
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:138:y:2023:i:c:s0168851023002051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.