IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9498-d1779570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Barriers to Sustainable Enterprise Risk Management in the Construction Sector: A Delphi Method and Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Raghad Almashhour

    (Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, School of Business Administration, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Abroon Qazi

    (Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, School of Business Administration, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • M. K. S. Al-Mhdawi

    (Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Abdelkader Daghfous

    (Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, School of Business Administration, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Bilal M. Ayyub

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center for Technology and Systems Management, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Alan O’Connor

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

Although sustainability has become a central concern in project management research, its integration into enterprise risk practices in construction remains limited. This study investigates the complex set of barriers preventing effective implementation of Sustainable Enterprise Risk Management (SERM) within the construction industry of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). SERM focuses on maintaining the system’s long-term effectiveness, adaptability, and resilience. As projects across the region expand in scale and complexity, the need for resilient and sustainability-aligned risk practices has become increasingly urgent. To address this gap, a structured four-stage methodology was adopted. A Systematic Literature Review identified 28 potential barriers, which were refined through a Delphi process to 16 validated barriers. Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and MICMAC analysis were then used to explore their hierarchical relationships and mutual influence. The ISM–MICMAC results showed that weak governance and limited organizational awareness reinforce communication and procedural challenges, while technology-related constraints remain highly dependent within the hierarchy. The sixteen barriers were categorized under four dimensions: leadership, culture, resources, and technology to clarify their structural relationships and dominant influence levels. Among these, the lack of senior management commitment (C01) emerged as the most influential barrier, exerting the strongest driving power (16) and lowest dependence (1), positioning it as the root cause affecting the rest. These findings highlight the need for leadership-driven strategies to embed long-term sustainability within organizational risk governance. The study offers practical direction for policymakers, contractors, and project leaders seeking to strengthen resilience and sustainable risk practices in the UAE construction sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghad Almashhour & Abroon Qazi & M. K. S. Al-Mhdawi & Abdelkader Daghfous & Bilal M. Ayyub & Alan O’Connor, 2025. "Analyzing Barriers to Sustainable Enterprise Risk Management in the Construction Sector: A Delphi Method and Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9498-:d:1779570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hennink, Monique & Kaiser, Bonnie N., 2022. "Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Guofeng Ma & Jianyao Jia & Jiyong Ding & Shanshan Shang & Shan Jiang, 2019. "Interpretive Structural Model Based Factor Analysis of BIM Adoption in Chinese Construction Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Zhu, Delong & Li, Zhe & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj, 2023. "Evaluation of the critical success factors of dynamic enterprise risk management in manufacturing SMEs using an integrated fuzzy decision-making model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    4. Roy Liff & Gunnar Wahlstrom, 2018. "Usefulness of enterprise risk management in two banks," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 124-150, February.
    5. Enrico Bracci & Tallaki Mouhcine & Tarek Rana & Danture Wickramasinghe, 2022. "Risk management and management accounting control systems in public sector organizations: a systematic literature review," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 395-402, August.
    6. Ferreira de Araújo Lima, Priscila & Crema, Maria & Verbano, Chiara, 2020. "Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 78-94.
    7. Ornella Tanga & Opeoluwa Akinradewo & Clinton Aigbavboa & Ayodeji Oke & Samuel Adekunle, 2022. "Data Management Risks: A Bane of Construction Project Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Chang Su & Jiayi Ma & Caiping Wang & Jun Deng & Weile Chen, 2025. "Flood-induced coal mine disaster chain evolution and risk analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(18), pages 21031-21058, November.
    9. Chairani Chairani & Sylvia Veronica Siregar, 2021. "The effect of enterprise risk management on financial performance and firm value: the role of environmental, social and governance performance," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(3), pages 647-670, June.
    10. Ruiz-Benítez, Rocío & López, Cristina & Real, Juan C., 2018. "The lean and resilient management of the supply chain and its impact on performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 190-202.
    11. Sylvester Senyo Horvey & Jones Odei-Mensah, 2023. "The measurements and performance of enterprise risk management: a comprehensive literature review," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 778-800, July.
    12. Bockius, Heike & Gatzert, Nadine, 2024. "Organizational risk culture: A literature review on dimensions, assessment, value relevance, and improvement levers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 539-564.
    13. Kyllbert Oliveira & Mirian Méxas & Marcelo Meiriño & Geisa Drumond, 2019. "Critical success factors associated with the implementation of enterprise risk management," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 1004-1019, August.
    14. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2022. "Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    2. Wang, Jianling & Ma, Jia & Li, Xiuling & Wang, Chen, 2025. "Nonlinear impact of economic policy uncertainty on corporate ESG performance: Regional, industrial and managerial perspectives," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.
    4. Sorin Gabriel Anton & Anca Elena Afloarei Nucu, 2020. "Enterprise Risk Management: A Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Doaa Hafez Emam Abdellattif & Amina Ramadan Mouhamed Nomer & Dalida Mohamed Adel Eldawayaty, 2025. "Sustainability Risk Management and Financial Distress: The Moderating Role of Financial Performance in Saudi Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-37, October.
    6. Oluwatoyin Abayomi Amuda & Ayotunde Qudus Saka, 2025. "Robert Gordon University, Department of Accounting and Finance, Aberdeen Business School," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 4444-4463, April.
    7. Ana Lorena Jiménez-Preciado & Miguel Ángel Martínez-García & José Carlos Trejo-García & Francisco Venegas-Martínez, 2025. "Short- and Long-Term Assessments of ESG Risk in Mexican Mortgage Institutions: Combining Expert Surveys, Radar Plot Visualization, and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, June.
    8. Nghia Nguyen Trinh & Nghia Dang Nguyen, 2025. "Geopolitical Risk and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices of listed companies in Vietnam," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 15(5), pages 150-168.
    9. Gülüm Özer & İdil Işık & Jordi Escartín, 2024. "Is There Somebody Looking out for Me? A Qualitative Analysis of Bullying Experiences of Individuals Diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Júlio Belo Fernandes & Diana Vareta & Sónia Fernandes & Ana Silva Almeida & Dina Peças & Noélia Ferreira & Liliana Roldão, 2022. "Rehabilitation Workforce Challenges to Implement Person-Centered Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    11. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez, 2022. "The Influence of Knowledge on Managing Risk for the Success in Complex Construction Projects: The IPMA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    12. Chikako Ishizuka & Kei Aoki, 2024. "Drivers of sustained brand engagement: cases of long-term customers of hedonic and utilitarian brands in Japan," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 979-989, December.
    13. Joseph M. Buguis & Reynaldo Castro, 2025. "Construct Development and Validation of Service Quality in the Context of Private Hospitals," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(7), pages 6053-6077, July.
    14. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    15. Cristina López & Rocío Ruíz-Benítez & Carmen Vargas-Machuca, 2019. "On the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Technological Innovations in Urban Bus Transport: The EU Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Reem Mohamed Gouda & Yasser Tawfik Halim, 2025. "The role of sustainable social media content in enhancing customer loyalty in the hospitality industry," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Maureen S. Golan & Laura H. Jernegan & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 222-243, June.
    18. Freddy Marilahimbilu Mgiba & Thozama Mxotwa, 2024. "Communicating Banking Cyber-security Measures, Customer Ethical Concerns, Experience, and Loyalty Intentions: A Developing Economy’s Perspective," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 123-135, May.
    19. Zohreh Molamohamadi & Mahmoud Asad Samani & Marjan Karimi, 2024. "Reviewing the historical milestones of risk management," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Tsega Meseret Biresaw & Athenia Bongani Sibindi, 2025. "The Assessment of Enterprise Risk Management Practices of Ethiopian Commercial Banks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-34, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9498-:d:1779570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.