IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v86y2025ipds154461232501904x.html

Stock market anomalies in the modern era

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon, Kemar
  • Schneider, Mark
  • Strauss, Jack

Abstract

The number of stock market anomalies has skyrocketed to more than a hundred in recent years and is popularly known as the factor zoo. At the same time, studies show that many of these anomalies have largely disappeared in the modern era of trading technology, consistent with an increase in market efficiency. Complicating the analysis is that research also shows that many of these anomalies hold conditionally, a function of time-varying regimes due to behavioral factors or aggregate risk. Our paper addresses these three concerns by investigating if theme portfolios (algorithmic clusters of market anomaly portfolios) still generate alpha in the modern era of trading conditional on sentiment and market volatility regimes. We identify and provide an explanation for the types of anomalies that exist in the modern era. The fall in transactions costs has lead to increases in market efficiency and the disappearance of most anomaly themes in the factor zoo. However, increases in modern trading technology and near zero-commission trading have spurred an interesting side effect, by facilitating the entry of retail traders. We show themes that appeal to lottery demand traders have survived. Thus, momentum, low-risk, and quality, conditional on sources of aggregate risk or mispricing, are still relevant in the modern era.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon, Kemar & Schneider, Mark & Strauss, Jack, 2025. "Stock market anomalies in the modern era," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PD).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:86:y:2025:i:pd:s154461232501904x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.108650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154461232501904X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Andrew Y. & Velikov, Mihail, 2023. "Zeroing In on the Expected Returns of Anomalies," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(3), pages 968-1004, May.
    2. Barinov, Alexander, 2023. "Profitability anomaly and aggregate volatility risk," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Jacobs, Heiko, 2015. "What explains the dynamics of 100 anomalies?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 65-85.
    4. Lee, Kiryoung & Joen, Yoontae & Kim, Minki, 2022. "Which uncertainty measures matter for the cross-section of stock returns?#," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    5. Svetlana Bryzgalova & Anna Pavlova & Taisiya Sikorskaya, 2023. "Retail Trading in Options and the Rise of the Big Three Wholesalers," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(6), pages 3465-3514, December.
    6. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 2015. "A five-factor asset pricing model," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 1-22.
    7. Soroush Ghazi & Mark Schneider & Jack Strauss, 2025. "Market Ambiguity Attitude Restores the Risk-Return Trade-Off," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8430-8451, October.
    8. Andrew Ang & Robert J. Hodrick & Yuhang Xing & Xiaoyan Zhang, 2006. "The Cross‐Section of Volatility and Expected Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(1), pages 259-299, February.
    9. Malcolm Baker & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2006. "Investor Sentiment and the Cross‐Section of Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(4), pages 1645-1680, August.
    10. Qadan, Mahmoud & Shuval, Kerem, 2022. "Variance risk and the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    11. John H. Cochrane, 2011. "Presidential Address: Discount Rates," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(4), pages 1047-1108, August.
    12. Brad M. Barber & Xing Huang & Terrance Odean & Christopher Schwarz, 2022. "Attention‐Induced Trading and Returns: Evidence from Robinhood Users," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(6), pages 3141-3190, December.
    13. Wagner, Moritz & Wei, Xiaopeng, 2024. "Ambiguous investor sentiment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    14. Malcolm Baker & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2007. "Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 129-152, Spring.
    15. Stambaugh, Robert F. & Yu, Jianfeng & Yuan, Yu, 2012. "The short of it: Investor sentiment and anomalies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 288-302.
    16. Baker, Malcolm & Wurgler, Jeffrey & Yuan, Yu, 2012. "Global, local, and contagious investor sentiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 272-287.
    17. Theis Ingerslev Jensen & Bryan Kelly & Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2023. "Is There a Replication Crisis in Finance?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(5), pages 2465-2518, October.
    18. Bali, Turan G. & Brown, Stephen J. & Murray, Scott & Tang, Yi, 2017. "A Lottery-Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(6), pages 2369-2397, December.
    19. Dominik M. Rösch & Avanidhar Subrahmanyam & Mathijs A. van Dijk, 2017. "The Dynamics of Market Efficiency," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(4), pages 1151-1187.
    20. Andrew Detzel & Robert Novy‐Marx & Mihail Velikov, 2023. "Model Comparison with Transaction Costs," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(3), pages 1743-1775, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Köstlmeier, Siegfried, 2024. "Pricing and mispricing of accounting fundamentals: Global evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 71-87.
    2. Chue, Timothy K. & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Mian, G. Mujtaba, 2019. "Aggregate investor sentiment and stock return synchronicity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. N. Banholzer & S. Heiden & D. Schneller, 2019. "Exploiting investor sentiment for portfolio optimization," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 671-702, December.
    4. Montone, Maurizio & van den Assem, Martijn J. & Zwinkels, Remco C.J., 2023. "Company name fluency and stock returns," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Vitor Azevedo & Christoph Kaserer & Lucila M. S. Campos, 2021. "Investor sentiment and the time-varying sustainability premium," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(7), pages 600-621, December.
    6. Guofu Zhou, 2018. "Measuring Investor Sentiment," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 239-259, November.
    7. Ghazi, Soroush & Schneider, Mark & Strauss, Jack, 2025. "Momentum is still there conditional on volatility-amplified pessimism," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Ding, Wenjie & Mazouz, Khelifa & Wang, Qingwei, 2021. "Volatility timing, sentiment, and the short-term profitability of VIX-based cross-sectional trading strategies," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 42-56.
    9. Nguyen, Hung T. & Pham, Mia Hang, 2021. "Air pollution and behavioral biases: Evidence from stock market anomalies," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    10. Frömmel, Michael & Han, Xing & Li, Youwei & Vigne, Samuel A., 2022. "Low liquidity beta anomaly in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    11. Montone, Maurizio, 2023. "Beta, value, and growth: Do dichotomous risk-preferences explain stock returns?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    12. Dittmann, Ingolf & Montone, Maurizio & Zhu, Yuhao, 2023. "Wage gap and stock returns: Do investors dislike pay inequality?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Bi, Jia & Zhu, Yifeng, 2020. "Value at risk, cross-sectional returns and the role of investor sentiment," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-18.
    14. Cakici, Nusret & Zaremba, Adam, 2022. "Salience theory and the cross-section of stock returns: International and further evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 689-725.
    15. Hadhri, Sinda & Younus, Mehak & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2025. "Listening to the Market: Music sentiment and cryptocurrency returns," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Lee, Kuan-Hui & Yang, Cheol-Won, 2022. "The world price of tail risk," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Adam Zaremba & Jacob Koby Shemer, 2018. "Price-Based Investment Strategies," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-91530-2, October.
    18. Lin, Chaonan & Chen, Hong-Yi & Ko, Kuan-Cheng & Yang, Nien-Tzu, 2021. "Time-dependent lottery preference and the cross-section of stock returns," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 272-294.
    19. Guidolin, Massimo & Ricci, Andrea, 2020. "Arbitrage risk and a sentiment as causes of persistent mispricing: The European evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-11.
    20. Liu, Yakun & Chen, Yan & Zhang, Lei & Deng, Xi, 2026. "Forecasting stock return: The role of idiosyncratic asymmetry risk," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:86:y:2025:i:pd:s154461232501904x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.