IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v20y2011i2p76-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agency problems and liquidity premium: Evidence from China's stock ownership reform

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Chao
  • Jin, Qinglu
  • Yuan, Hongqi

Abstract

Before the split share structure reform, China's publicly listed companies in domestic stock exchanges had two classes of stock: tradable and non-tradable shares. These two classes of stock had the same voting, cash flow, and all other legal rights except that non-tradable shares cannot be transferred at the open markets. From 2005, China implemented the reform to convert all non-tradable shares into tradable. In this reform process, the holders of non-tradable shares had to negotiate with their tradable counterparts to determine how much liquidity premium, or the compensation ratio, to pay the holders of tradable shares in order to obtain the liquidity right. Unlike previous studies, this paper starts with a theoretical model to identify the fundamental factors, including price discount before and after the reform, the percentage of non-tradable shares, the volatility of tradable share price, and the lockup period, that should determine the compensation ratio. We show that most of these factors are statistically significant in determining the compensation ratio. However, the agency problems induced by state and mutual fund ownerships weaken the role of the fundamental factors in determining the compensation ratios.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Chao & Jin, Qinglu & Yuan, Hongqi, 2011. "Agency problems and liquidity premium: Evidence from China's stock ownership reform," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 76-87, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:20:y:2011:i:2:p:76-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057-5219(11)00015-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul A. Gompers & Andrew Metrick, 2001. "Institutional Investors and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 116(1), pages 229-259.
    2. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. " A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    3. repec:hrv:faseco:30728046 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Aharony, Joseph & Wang, Jiwei & Yuan, Hongqi, 2010. "Tunneling as an incentive for earnings management during the IPO process in China," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Firth, Michael & Lin, Chen & Zou, Hong, 2010. "Friend or Foe? The Role of State and Mutual Fund Ownership in the Split Share Structure Reform in China," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(03), pages 685-706, June.
    6. Longstaff, Francis A, 1995. " How Much Can Marketability Affect Security Values?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(5), pages 1767-1774, December.
    7. Jiang, Guohua & Lee, Charles M.C. & Yue, Heng, 2010. "Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Stijn Claessens & Joseph P. H. Fan, 2002. "Corporate Governance in Asia: A Survey," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 3(2), pages 71-103.
    9. Ke, Bin & Ramalingegowda, Santhosh, 2005. "Do institutional investors exploit the post-earnings announcement drift?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 25-53, February.
    10. Pound, John, 1988. "Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 237-265, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:bla:acctfi:v:57:y:2017:i::p:69-100 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Tzu-Yun Tseng, 2012. "Impact on Agency Problems of China's Reform of the Split-Share Structure," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(S3), pages 35-44, September.
    3. repec:bla:acctfi:v:57:y:2017:i:2:p:401-428 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Haß, Lars Helge & Vergauwe, Skrålan & Zhang, Qiyu, 2014. "Corporate governance and the information environment: Evidence from Chinese stock markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 106-119.
    5. Tzu-Yun Tseng, 2012. "Impact on Agency Problems of China's Reform of the Split-Share Structure," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(S3), pages 35-44, September.
    6. He, Lerong & Wan, Hong & Zhou, Xin, 2014. "How are political connections valued in China? Evidence from market reaction to CEO succession," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 141-152.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:20:y:2011:i:2:p:76-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.