IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v42y2024i3p385-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Better to be the same or different? Paired customer and selling orientations and their impact on the exploitation of relationship-specific investments (RSIs) in dyads

Author

Listed:
  • Zerbini, Fabrizio
  • Miceli, Gaetano “Nino”
  • De Carlo, Manuela

Abstract

This study investigates whether and how pairing two firms with the same priority – either a customer or a selling orientation – affects the two sides of the dyad's ability to ensure firm-level outcomes from Relationship-Specific Investments (RSIs). We find that pairing firms with a customer orientation positively moderates the effects of RSIs on the firm's performance of both the buyer and the seller. Conversely, pairing firms with a selling orientation has negative influence on RSIs effects, but only for the seller's performance. We discuss this study's contributions to the body of research on RSIs and strategic orientations and, specifically, to literature that focuses on the joint effect of strategic orientations across firms. Additionally, we highlight the implications of our findings for research on inter-organizational relationship development and, particularly, for the task-contingent interpretation of the homophily effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Zerbini, Fabrizio & Miceli, Gaetano “Nino” & De Carlo, Manuela, 2024. "Better to be the same or different? Paired customer and selling orientations and their impact on the exploitation of relationship-specific investments (RSIs) in dyads," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 385-396.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:3:p:385-396
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2022.10.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322001475
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2022.10.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yannick Gabuthy & Abhinay Muthoo, 2019. "Bargaining and hold-up: the role of arbitration," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(1), pages 292-308.
    2. Michael Ahearne & Yashar Atefi & Son K. Lam & Mohsen Pourmasoudi, 2022. "The future of buyer–seller interactions: a conceptual framework and research agenda," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 22-45, January.
    3. Zhou, Kevin Zheng & Gao, Gerald Yong & Yang, Zhilin & Zhou, Nan, 2005. "Developing strategic orientation in China: antecedents and consequences of market and innovation orientations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(8), pages 1049-1058, August.
    4. Praveen K. Kopalle & V. Kumar & Mohan Subramaniam, 2020. "How legacy firms can embrace the digital ecosystem via digital customer orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 114-131, January.
    5. Elg, Ulf, 2007. "Market Orientation as Inter-firm Cooperation:: An International Study of the Grocery Sector," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 283-297, August.
    6. Morita, Hodaka & Servátka, Maroš, 2013. "Group identity and relation-specific investment: An experimental investigation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 95-109.
    7. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619500166 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Kadic-Maglajlic, Selma & Micevski, Milena & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja & Lee, Nick, 2017. "Customer and selling orientations of retail salespeople and the sales manager's ability-to-perceive-emotions: A multi-level approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 53-62.
    9. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Gilles Laurent, 1985. "Measuring consumer involvement profiles," Post-Print hal-00786781, HAL.
    10. Ernan Haruvy & Elena Katok & Zhongwen Ma & Suresh Sethi, 2019. "Relationship-specific investment and hold-up problems in supply chains: theory and experiments," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 45-74, April.
    11. Georg Noldeke & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1995. "Option Contracts and Renegotiation: A Solution to the Hold-Up Problem," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 26(2), pages 163-179, Summer.
    12. Adams, Pamela & Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria & Fontana, Roberto, 2019. "Strategic orientation, innovation performance and the moderating influence of marketing management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 129-140.
    13. Yadong Luo & Yi Liu & Jiaqi Xue, 2009. "Relationship Investment and Channel Performance: An Analysis of Mediating Forces," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7), pages 1113-1137, November.
    14. Ritch L. Sorenson & Cathleen A. Folker & Keith H. Brigham, 2008. "The Collaborative Network Orientation: Achieving Business Success through Collaborative Relationships," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(4), pages 615-634, July.
    15. Feng, Taiwen & Wang, Dan & Lawton, Alan & Luo, Ben Nanfeng, 2019. "Customer orientation and firm performance: The joint moderating effects of ethical leadership and competitive intensity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 111-121.
    16. Rajeswararao Chaganti & Rakesh Sambharya, 1987. "Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(4), pages 393-401, July.
    17. Asanuma, Banri, 1989. "Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, March.
    18. Abdullah Al Mamun & Syed Ali Fazal & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Zhan Su, 2019. "STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS, THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND INNOVATION: A STUDY AMONG MALAYSIAN MANUFACTURING SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 1-25, February.
    19. Kwaku Atuahene-Gima & Anthony Ko, 2001. "An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 54-74, February.
    20. Lee, Corrinne Mei Jyin & Che-Ha, Norbani & Syed Alwi, Sharifah Faridah, 2021. "Service customer orientation and social sustainability: The case of small medium enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 751-760.
    21. Mats Alvesson & Hugh Willmott, 2002. "Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 619-644, July.
    22. Ritter, Thomas & Gemunden, Hans Georg, 2003. "Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 745-755, September.
    23. Wayne S. DeSarbo & C. Anthony Di Benedetto & Michael Song & Indrajit Sinha, 2005. "Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 47-74, January.
    24. Rohit Deshpandé & Amir Grinstein & Elie Ofek, 2012. "Strategic orientations in a competitive context: The role of strategic orientation differentiation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 629-643, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Xinbo & Zhang, Qingqiang, 2021. "Building digital incentives for digital customer orientation in platform ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 555-566.
    2. Abbasali Hosseinian Dastjerdi & Mustafa Tumer, 2024. "The Effects of Strategic Orientation on Mass Customization Capacity in Iran: The Mediating Role of Intellectual Capital," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    3. Jianhong He & Hongmin Chen & Fu-Sheng Tsai, 2020. "Strategy Orientation, Innovation Capacity Endowment, and International R&D Intensity of Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Göller, Daniel & Stremitzer, Alexander, 2014. "Breach remedies inducing hybrid investments," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 26-38.
    5. Marcin Suder, 2025. "Determinant or moderator? Exploring the role of the external environment in the relationship between dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. Evidence from the hotel industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-53, December.
    6. José Sousa & Xavier Fairise, 2014. "On the value of partial commitment for cooperative investment in buyer–supplier relationship," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 151-171, March.
    7. Ting Kong & Taiwen Feng & Yufei Huang & Junya Cai, 2020. "How to convert green supply chain integration efforts into green innovation: A perspective of knowledge‐based view," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1106-1121, September.
    8. Engelen, Andreas & Kube, Harald & Schmidt, Susanne & Flatten, Tessa Christina, 2014. "Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1353-1369.
    9. Jaeger, Nikolai A. & Zacharias, Nicolas A. & Brettel, Malte, 2016. "Nonlinear and dynamic effects of responsive and proactive market orientation: A longitudinal investigation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 767-779.
    10. Cheng, Colin C.J. & Shiu, Eric C., 2022. "A two-level, longitudinal investigation into the effects of employee social entrepreneurship orientation and top management team decisions on product innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    12. Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio, 2016. "A systematic review of supply chain knowledge management research: State of the art and research opportunities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 276-292.
    13. Krzysztof Borodako & Jadwiga Berbeka & Michał Rudnicki, 2021. "Innovation Orientation in Business Services," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 19897.
    14. Md. Uzir Hossain Uzir & Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid & Ishraq Jerin & Ahmad Shaharudin Abdul Latiff & Ramayah Thurasamy, 2021. "Customer satisfaction and brand loyalty to electronic home appliances in Bangladesh: the contingent role of brand trust," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(6), pages 1-35, June.
    15. Yadi Yang, 2021. "A Survey Of The Hold‐Up Problem In The Experimental Economics Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 227-249, February.
    16. Ardito, Lorenzo & Raby, Simon & Albino, Vito & Bertoldi, Bernardo, 2021. "The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 44-56.
    17. Kim, Namwoon & Shin, Sohyoun & Min, Sungwook, 2016. "Strategic marketing capability: Mobilizing technological resources for new product advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5644-5652.
    18. Kaiming Zheng & Xiaoyuan Wang & Debing Ni & Yang Yang, 2020. "Reciprocity and Veto Power in Relation-Specific Investments: An Experimental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Hanyu Zhu & Kailing Zhang & Gang Li & Lin Chen & Xijie Zhao, 2022. "Relationship Management Capability and Service Innovation Performance: The Joint-Effect of Relationship Learning and Competitive Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Makoto Hanazono, 2004. "Holdup with Subsidized Investment," Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings 640, Econometric Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:42:y:2024:i:3:p:385-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.