IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v39y2021i4p521-533.html

Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: Additional benefits and execution protocols

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Ralph I.
  • Clark, Leigh Anne
  • Clark, W. Randy
  • Raffo, Deana M.

Abstract

A systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of literature related to a research question and synthesizes previous work to strengthen a particular topic’s foundation of knowledge, while adhering to the concepts of transparency and bias reduction. In the growing, complex, and dynamic, management research field, systematic literature reviews have value, yet there is relatively little work published describing how management researchers might apply this approach. In explaining the purpose of systematic reviews, we define a systematic review and describe its rationale. We then discuss how systematic literature reviews may enhance management research and address current management research shortcomings. We present a detailed systematic literature review execution guideline, outlining systematic literature review steps, and providing keys to effective implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Ralph I. & Clark, Leigh Anne & Clark, W. Randy & Raffo, Deana M., 2021. "Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: Additional benefits and execution protocols," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 521-533.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:521-533
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026323732030133X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Bettis & Sendil Ethiraj & Alfonso Gambardella & Constance Helfat & Will Mitchell, 2016. "Creating repeatable cumulative knowledge in strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 257-261, February.
    2. Christian F. Durach & Joakim Kembro & Andreas Wieland, 2017. "A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(4), pages 67-85, October.
    3. Christian Fisch & Joern Block, 2018. "Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 103-106, April.
    4. Paul, Justin & Criado, Alex Rialp, 2020. "The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    5. Lueg, Rainer & Radlach, Ronny, 2016. "Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 158-171.
    6. Marc Orlitzky, 2011. "Institutionalized dualism: statistical significance testing as myth and ceremony," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 47-77, September.
    7. Dorn, Stefanie & Schweiger, Bastian & Albers, Sascha, 2016. "Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 484-500.
    8. Trochim, William M. K., 1989. "An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Michael S. McLeod & G. Tyge Payne & Robert E. Evert, 2016. "Organizational Ethics Research: A Systematic Review of Methods and Analytical Techniques," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 429-443, March.
    10. Colin Donaldson, 2019. "Intentions resurrected: a systematic review of entrepreneurial intention research from 2014 to 2018 and future research agenda," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 953-975, September.
    11. Amanda Kvarven & Eirik Strømland & Magnus Johannesson, 2020. "Author Correction: Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 659-663, June.
    12. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    13. Khosravi, Pouria & Newton, Cameron & Rezvani, Azadeh, 2019. "Management innovation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of past decades of research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 694-707.
    14. Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh, 2020. "Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 175-194, May.
    15. Richard A. Bettis, 2012. "The search for asterisks: Compromised statistical tests and flawed theories," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 108-113, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klimas, Patrycja & Sachpazidu, Karina & Stańczyk, Sylwia, 2023. "The attributes of coopetitive relationships: What do we know and not know about them?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 883-898.
    2. Jan Wiers & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis of immigrant entrepreneurship research 2009–2019," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 441-464, December.
    3. Bhullar, Pritpal Singh & Joshi, Mahesh & Sharma, Sharad & Kaur, Amanpreet & Phan, Duc, 2025. "Greenwashing and ESG: Bibliometric analysis and future research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Hensel, Przemysław G., 2019. "Supporting replication research in management journals: Qualitative analysis of editorials published between 1970 and 2015," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 45-57.
    5. Esther García‐Río & Francisco Rincon‐Roldan & Pedro Baena‐Luna, 2025. "Mapping the relevance and influence of gender in social economy enterprises: A review based on bibliographic analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(3), pages 433-453, September.
    6. Ralph I. Williams & Deana M. Raffo & W. Randy Clark & Leigh Anne Clark, 2023. "A systematic review of leader credibility: its murky framework needs clarity," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 1751-1794, December.
    7. repec:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:10:p:1198-1207 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Adrian Ade, 2025. "A mapping of two spheres: how SEW stimulates the strategic analysis and forecast of a family firm," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 705-745, February.
    9. Mark D. Packard & Per L. Bylund, 2025. "Truth, knowledge, and entrepreneurship theory: arguments for a rationalist scientific epistemology," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 381-405, June.
    10. Appiah, Emmanuel Kusi & Gabrielsson, Peter & Rialp Criado, Alex, 2025. "The role of digitalization in early internationalization Research: A systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    11. Lukas Wolf & Martina Steul-Fischer, 2023. "Factors of customers’ channel choice in an omnichannel environment: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 1579-1630, December.
    12. Serena Strazzullo & Sérgio Moro & Livio Cricelli, 2023. "Unveiling the relationship between sustainable development and Industry 4.0: A text mining literature analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2851-2862, August.
    13. Batista-Canino, Rosa M. & Santana-Hernández, Lidia & Medina-Brito, Pino, 2024. "A holistic literature review on entrepreneurial Intention: A scientometric approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. David Mhlanga, 2022. "Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: The Superlative Approach to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals in the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Johannes Brunzel, 2021. "Overconfidence and narcissism among the upper echelons: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 585-623, July.
    16. Anderson, Brian S. & Wennberg, Karl & McMullen, Jeffery S., 2019. "Editorial: Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1-1.
    17. Wennberg, Karl & Anderson, Brian S. & McMullen, Jeffrey, 2019. "2 Editorial: Enhancing Quantitative Theory-Testing Entrepreneurship Research," Ratio Working Papers 323, The Ratio Institute.
    18. Heinz Herrmann & M. J. Cobo Martín, 2025. "Bidding for B2B or B2G tenders: toward the adoption of pricing models in practice," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 1495-1533, June.
    19. Haldun Çolak & Bilal Saraç & Celal Hakan Kağnicioğlu, 2025. "Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience via Digital Technologies in Knowledge Economy with an Emphasis on Human Capital: An Integrated Systematic Literature Review and SF-AHP Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11547-11582, September.
    20. Sascha Kraus & Ricarda B. Bouncken & Alba Yela Aránega, 2024. "The burgeoning role of literature review articles in management research: an introduction and outlook," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 299-314, February.
    21. K. Pooja & Pallavi Upadhyaya, 2024. "What makes an online review credible? A systematic review of the literature and future research directions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 627-659, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:521-533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.