IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v33y2010i4p410-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between perceived improvement and treatment satisfaction among clients of a methadone maintenance program

Author

Listed:
  • Perreault, Michel
  • White, Noé Djawn
  • Fabrès, Éric
  • Landry, Michel
  • Anestin, Annélie S.
  • Rabouin, Daniel

Abstract

Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between perceived improvement and client satisfaction in a methadone maintenance treatment population. A secondary objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Perceived Improvement Questionnaire (PIQ).Data sources/study setting Two hundred and thirty-two clients of a methadone maintenance treatment program filled out self-reported questionnaires and two open-ended questions measuring their perceived improvement and their level of satisfaction with the services received.Principal findings Correlation analyses revealed a significant relationship between participants' perceived improvement and their level of satisfaction with services received throughout their treatment. A factor analysis identified 3 sub-scales of the PIQ: emotional health, social relations and physical health. The PIQ's internal consistency and construct validity supported the adequacy of the metric properties of the questionnaire.Conclusion Further research is needed to investigate the link between clients' input and treatment satisfaction in different substance abuse populations. The scale's potential to provide valuable information such as clinical assessment and program evaluation should be explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Perreault, Michel & White, Noé Djawn & Fabrès, Éric & Landry, Michel & Anestin, Annélie S. & Rabouin, Daniel, 2010. "Relationship between perceived improvement and treatment satisfaction among clients of a methadone maintenance program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 410-417, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:4:p:410-417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(09)00121-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tanner, Barry A., 1982. "A multi-dimensional client satisfaction instrument," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 161-167, January.
    2. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    3. Greenfield, Thomas K. & Attkisson, C. Clifford, 1989. "Steps toward a multifactorial satisfaction scale for primary care and mental health services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 271-278, January.
    4. Garland, Ann F. & Saltzman, Marla D. & Aarons, Gregory A., 2000. "Adolescent satisfaction with mental health services: development of a multidimensional scale," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 165-175, May.
    5. Larsen, Daniel L. & Attkisson, C. Clifford & Hargreaves, William A. & Nguyen, Tuan D., 1979. "Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 197-207, January.
    6. Perreault, Michel & Leichner, Pierre & sabourin, stephane & gendreau, pierre, 1993. "Patient satisfaction with outpatient psychiatric services : Qualitative and quantitative assessments," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 109-118.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Padyab, Mojgan & Grahn, Robert & Lundgren, Lena, 2015. "Drop-out from the Swedish addiction compulsory care system," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 178-184.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:4:p:410-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.