IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v313y2024ics0360544224036661.html

Decoding the mechanisms influencing public acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage technology in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Yue
  • Liu, Zaiqiang
  • Kato, Takaaki
  • Shi, Chunyan
  • Xu, Tongyu
  • Gao, Weijun

Abstract

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) technology plays a crucial role in reducing carbon emissions and addressing climate change, making it essential to understand the key factors influencing public acceptance of CCS technology. This study comprehensively analyzes the impact of different information dissemination methods on the acceptance of CCS technology among the Chinese public. The study conducted an in-depth analysis of data from 1313 respondents using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to validate the evaluations from 13 experts. The results indicate that the Not In My Backyard (NIMBY) effect is the most critical factor influencing public acceptance of CCS technology, followed by Recognition of Utility (ROU).Success case information significantly enhances public acceptance of CCS technology, while risk information, although increasing awareness, also heightens concerns. This study provided valuable insights for developing strategies to improve public acceptance of CCS technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Yue & Liu, Zaiqiang & Kato, Takaaki & Shi, Chunyan & Xu, Tongyu & Gao, Weijun, 2024. "Decoding the mechanisms influencing public acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage technology in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224036661
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224036661
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133888?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minh Ha-Duong & Ana Sofia Campos & Alain Nadaï, 2007. "A survey on the public perception of CCS in France," Working Papers hal-00866557, HAL.
    2. Cary, Michael & Stephens, Heather M., 2024. "Economic, environmental, and technical gains from the Kyoto Protocol: Evidence from cement manufacturing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Christian Oltra & Roser Sala & Àlex Boso, 2012. "The influence of information on individuals' reactions to CCS technologies: results from experimental online survey research," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 2(3), pages 209-215, June.
    4. Miao, Yuang & Lu, Huixia & Cui, Shizhang & Zhang, Xu & Zhang, Yusheng & Song, Xinwang & Cheng, Haiying, 2024. "CO2 emissions change in Tianjin: The driving factors and the role of CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    5. David M. Reiner, 2016. "Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, January.
    6. Hobman, Elizabeth V. & Ashworth, Peta, 2013. "Public support for energy sources and related technologies: The impact of simple information provision," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 862-869.
    7. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.
    8. Shu Zhang & Wenying Chen, 2022. "Assessing the energy transition in China towards carbon neutrality with a probabilistic framework," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. L׳Orange Seigo, Selma & Dohle, Simone & Siegrist, Michael, 2014. "Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 848-863.
    10. Chen, Zheng-Ao & Li, Qi & Liu, Lan-Cui & Zhang, Xian & Kuang, Liping & Jia, Li & Liu, Guizhen, 2015. "A large national survey of public perceptions of CCS technology in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 366-377.
    11. Vögele, Stefan & Rübbelke, Dirk & Mayer, Philip & Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm, 2018. "Germany’s “No” to carbon capture and storage: Just a question of lacking acceptance?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 205-218.
    12. Carola Braun & Christine Merk & Gert Pönitzsch & Katrin Rehdanz & Ulrich Schmidt, 2018. "Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany: survey evidence," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 471-484, April.
    13. Yang, Lin & Zhang, Xian & McAlinden, Karl J., 2016. "The effect of trust on people's acceptance of CCS (carbon capture and storage) technologies: Evidence from a survey in the People's Republic of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 69-79.
    14. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    15. Kraeusel, Jonas & Möst, Dominik, 2012. "Carbon Capture and Storage on its way to large-scale deployment: Social acceptance and willingness to pay in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 642-651.
    16. Michael Siegrist, 2000. "The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, April.
    17. Zhang, Xiaogang & Jin, Chao & Zhang, Decheng & Zhang, Chengpeng & Ranjith, P.G. & Yuan, Yong, 2023. "Carbon dioxide flow behaviour in macro-scale bituminous coal: An experimental determination of the influence of effective stress," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    18. Kohko Tokushige & Keigo Akimoto & Toshimasa Tomoda, 2007. "Public acceptance and risk-benefit perception of CO 2 geological storage for global warming mitigation in Japan," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(7), pages 1237-1251, August.
    19. Bengang Li & Thomas Gasser & Philippe Ciais & Shilong Piao & Shu Tao & Yves Balkanski & Didier Hauglustaine & Juan-Pablo Boisier & Zhuo Chen & Mengtian Huang & Laurent Zhaoxin Li & Yue Li & Hongyan Li, 2016. "The contribution of China’s emissions to global climate forcing," Nature, Nature, vol. 531(7594), pages 357-361, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Guangyao & Yu, Hao & Ji, Dongxu & Zhu, Chuanyong & Thu, Kyaw & Miyazaki, Takahiko, 2025. "Pine cone-based activated carbon via dual physical activation for efficient carbon dioxide capture: Experimental and molecular simulation studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    2. Trong Vinh Bui & Hong Hai Dao & Huynh Thong Nguyen & Quoc Dung Ta & Hai Nam Nguyen Le & Phuc Kieu & Cao Lan Mai & Trung Dung Tran & Huu Son Nguyen & Hoang Dung Nguyen & Trung Tin Huynh, 2025. "A Critical Review on the Opportunities and Challenges of Offshore Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Lin & Zhang, Xian & McAlinden, Karl J., 2016. "The effect of trust on people's acceptance of CCS (carbon capture and storage) technologies: Evidence from a survey in the People's Republic of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 69-79.
    2. Carola Braun & Christine Merk & Gert Pönitzsch & Katrin Rehdanz & Ulrich Schmidt, 2018. "Public perception of climate engineering and carbon capture and storage in Germany: survey evidence," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 471-484, April.
    3. Ting Xiao & Erin Middleton & Omar Bakelli & Sophia Cheng & Danyang Zhu & Lei Xu & Brian McPherson, 2026. "Public Perceptions and Engagement for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage: Literature Review With a Case Study of Utah, USA," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 16(1), pages 125-157, February.
    4. L׳Orange Seigo, Selma & Dohle, Simone & Siegrist, Michael, 2014. "Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 848-863.
    5. Valentina Kashintseva & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis & Tatiana Veynbender, 2018. "Consumer Attitudes towards Industrial CO 2 Capture and Storage Products and Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Liu, Bingsheng & Xu, Yinghua & Yang, Yang & Lu, Shijian, 2021. "How public cognition influences public acceptance of CCUS in China: Based on the ABC (affect, behavior, and cognition) model of attitudes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Zeynep Clulow & Michele Ferguson & Peta Ashworth & David Reiner, 2021. "Political ideology and public views of the energy transition in Australia and the UK," Working Papers EPRG2106, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    8. Katja Witte, 2021. "Social Acceptance of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from Industrial Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, November.
    9. Carola Braun, 2017. "Not in My Backyard: CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2264-2275, December.
    10. Jiang, Kai & Ashworth, Peta, 2021. "The development of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) research in China: A bibliometric perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Hao Yu & David M. Reiner & Hao Chen & Zhifu Mi, 2018. "A comparison of public preferences for different low-carbon energy technologies: Support for CCS, nuclear and wind energy in the United Kingdom," Working Papers EPRG 1810, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    12. Pianta, Silvia & Rinscheid, Adrian & Weber, Elke U., 2021. "Carbon Capture and Storage in the United States: Perceptions, preferences, and lessons for policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Jingjing Xie & Yujiao Xian & Guowei Jia, 2023. "An investigation into the public acceptance in China of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Yang, Lin & Hou, Huiyun & Lv, Haodong & Wu, Guanqi & Xu, Bang & Li, Yiming, 2025. "Exploring the development path of bioenergy carbon capture and storage for achieving carbon neutrality in China: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Danny Otto & Marit Sprenkeling & Ruben Peuchen & Åsta Dyrnes Nordø & Dimitrios Mendrinos & Spyridon Karytsas & Siri Veland & Olympia Polyzou & Martha Lien & Yngve Heggelund & Matthias Gross & Pim Piek, 2022. "On the Organisation of Translation—An Inter- and Transdisciplinary Approach to Developing Design Options for CO 2 Storage Monitoring Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Ahmed, Bruktawit M. & Fikru, Mahelet G., 2025. "Evaluating consumer preference and willingness to pay for low emission electricity: Evidence from a national choice experiment in the US," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    18. Radosław Tarkowski & Barbara Uliasz-Misiak, 2025. "Public Acceptance of the Underground Storage of Hydrogen: Lessons Learned from the Geological Storage of CO 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Scovell, Mitchell & McCrea, Rod & Walton, Andrea & Poruschi, Lavinia, 2024. "Local acceptance of solar farms: The impact of energy narratives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    20. Ladenburg, Jacob & Kim, Jiwon & Zuch, Matteo & Soytas, Ugur, 2024. "Taking the carbon capture and storage, wind power, PV or other renewable technology path to fight climate change? Exploring the acceptance of climate change mitigation technologies – A Danish national representative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224036661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.