IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v237y2021ics0360544221018132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-level game theory model for partially deregulated generation expansion planning

Author

Listed:
  • Budi, Rizki Firmansyah Setya
  • Sarjiya,
  • Hadi, Sasongko Pramono

Abstract

Keeping the optimal planning solution in generation expansion problems under a partially deregulated market has raised a research gap based on an analytical approach. Therefore, this research proposes a multi-level game theory method for modelling the generation expansion planning in the partially deregulated market by considering the economic objective function and reliability constraint. The multi-level game theory is a modelling technique that combines game theory for multi-objective function and bi-level modelling. This research uses a case study of the West Nusa Tenggara system for implementation. The results show that the generation cost can be reduced by 25.7% compared to the 2019 generation cost and 2.9% compared to the electricity supply business plan. The proposed model results show that the electricity supply business plan needs to be revised, e.g., some committed power plants whose owners are unallocated do not need to be built, and some of those plants need to be postponed. Also, the financial burden of the utility to build power plants can be reduced if GenCos are interested in investing in unallocated power plants. Revising the electricity supply business plan produces a more economical plan and avoids inaccuracies in determining the owner.

Suggested Citation

  • Budi, Rizki Firmansyah Setya & Sarjiya, & Hadi, Sasongko Pramono, 2021. "Multi-level game theory model for partially deregulated generation expansion planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221018132
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221018132
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Xian & Chan, K.W. & Wang, Huaizhi & Hu, Jiefeng & Zhou, Bin & Zhang, Yan & Qiu, Jing, 2019. "Game-theoretic planning for integrated energy system with independent participants considering ancillary services of power-to-gas stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 249-264.
    2. Gacitua, L. & Gallegos, P. & Henriquez-Auba, R. & Lorca, Á. & Negrete-Pincetic, M. & Olivares, D. & Valenzuela, A. & Wenzel, G., 2018. "A comprehensive review on expansion planning: Models and tools for energy policy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 346-360.
    3. Stojiljković, Mirko M., 2017. "Bi-level multi-objective fuzzy design optimization of energy supply systems aided by problem-specific heuristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1231-1251.
    4. Torben M. Andersen & Giuseppe Bertola & Clemens Fuest & Cecilia Garcia-Peñalosa & Harold James & Jan-Egbert Sturm, 2022. "Chapter 1: Macroeconomic Conditions and Outlook," EEAG Report on the European Economy, CESifo, vol. 0, pages 9-29, March.
    5. Torstein Bye & Einar Hope, 2005. "Deregulation of electricity markets : The Norwegian experience," Discussion Papers 433, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    6. -, 2016. "U.S. Economic Outlook: Quarterly developments," Oficina de la CEPAL en Washington (Estudios e Investigaciones) 40851, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    7. Gencer, Busra & Larsen, Erik Reimer & van Ackere, Ann, 2020. "Understanding the coevolution of electricity markets and regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Qi, Yongzhi & Liu, Yutian & Wu, Qiuwei, 2017. "Non-cooperative regulation coordination based on game theory for wind farm clusters during ramping events," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 136-146.
    9. Paul L. Joskow, 2008. "Lessons Learned from Electricity Market Liberalization," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 9-42.
    10. -, 2016. "U.S. Economic Outlook: Quarterly developments," Oficina de la CEPAL en Washington (Estudios e Investigaciones) 40719, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    11. Karasu, Seçkin & Altan, Aytaç & Bekiros, Stelios & Ahmad, Wasim, 2020. "A new forecasting model with wrapper-based feature selection approach using multi-objective optimization technique for chaotic crude oil time series," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    12. Jiang, Yanni & Zhou, Kaile & Lu, Xinhui & Yang, Shanlin, 2020. "Electricity trading pricing among prosumers with game theory-based model in energy blockchain environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    13. Sadeghi, Hadi & Rashidinejad, Masoud & Abdollahi, Amir, 2017. "A comprehensive sequential review study through the generation expansion planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1369-1394.
    14. Ponce-Jara, M.A. & Castro, M. & Pelaez-Samaniego, M.R. & Espinoza-Abad, J.L. & Ruiz, E., 2018. "Electricity sector in Ecuador: An overview of the 2007–2017 decade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 513-522.
    15. Peng, Xu & Tao, Xiaoma, 2018. "Cooperative game of electricity retailers in China's spot electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 152-170.
    16. Sarjiya, & Budi, Rizki Firmansyah Setya & Hadi, Sasongko Pramono, 2019. "Game theory for multi-objective and multi-period framework generation expansion planning in deregulated markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 323-330.
    17. -, 2016. "U.S. Economic Outlook: Quarterly developments," Oficina de la CEPAL en Washington (Estudios e Investigaciones) 40295, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Unknown, 2016. "Grain and Oilseeds outlook for 2016," Agricultural Outlook Forum 2016 236594, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    19. Dyner, Isaac & Larsen, Erik R., 2001. "From planning to strategy in the electricity industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(13), pages 1145-1154, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xian Huang & Kun Liu, 2023. "Impact of Electricity Price Expectation in the Planning Period on the Evolution of Generation Expansion Planning in the Market Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Jafari, Hamed & Safarzadeh, Soroush & Azad-Farsani, Ehsan, 2022. "Effects of governmental policies on energy-efficiency improvement of hydrogen fuel cell cars: A game-theoretic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    3. Raycheva, Elena & Gjorgiev, Blazhe & Hug, Gabriela & Sansavini, Giovanni & Schaffner, Christian, 2023. "Risk-informed coordinated generation and transmission system expansion planning: A net-zero scenario of Switzerland in the European context," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felipe Cerdas & Paul Titscher & Nicolas Bognar & Richard Schmuch & Martin Winter & Arno Kwade & Christoph Herrmann, 2018. "Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Setya Budi, Rizki Firmansyah & Sarjiya, & Hadi, Sasongko Pramono, 2022. "Indonesia's deregulated generation expansion planning model based on mixed strategy game theory model for determining the optimal power purchase agreement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Gencer, Busra & Larsen, Erik Reimer & van Ackere, Ann, 2020. "Understanding the coevolution of electricity markets and regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Elem Eyrice, Tepeciklioğlu & M. Evren, Tok & Syed Abul, Basher, 2017. "Turkish and BRICS Engagement in Africa: Between humanitarian and economic interests," MPRA Paper 77549, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Ximing Cheng & Michael Pecht, 2017. "In Situ Stress Measurement Techniques on Li-ion Battery Electrodes: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Thomas Url, 2017. "Private Insurance Premium Income Declined in 2016," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 22(14), pages 133-142, September.
    7. Hussaini, 2020. "The Historical Sources of Nationalism in the Contemporary China," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 13(1), pages 536-550, November.
    8. Leszek Sieczko & Anna Justyna Parzonko & Anna Sieczko, 2021. "Trust in Collective Entrepreneurship in the Context of the Development of Rural Areas in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    9. Marco Torresi & Francesco Fornarelli & Bernardo Fortunato & Sergio Mario Camporeale & Alessandro Saponaro, 2017. "Assessment against Experiments of Devolatilization and Char Burnout Models for the Simulation of an Aerodynamically Staged Swirled Low-NO x Pulverized Coal Burner," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Josef Baumgartner & Sandra Bilek-Steindl & Serguei Kaniovski & Hans Pitlik, 2016. "Moderate Economic Growth – Unemployment Remaining High. Medium-term Forecast for the Austrian Economy Until 2021," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 21(19), pages 185-201, December.
    11. Worch, Hagen & Truffer, Bernhard & Kabinga, Mundia & Eberhard, Anton & Markard, Jochen, 2013. "A capability perspective on performance deficiencies in utility firms," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-9.
    12. Valenzuela, Jose Maria, 2023. "State ownership in liberal economic governance? De-risking private investment in the electricity sector in Mexico," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    13. Scott, Ian J. & Carvalho, Pedro M.S. & Botterud, Audun & Silva, Carlos A., 2021. "Long-term uncertainties in generation expansion planning: Implications for electricity market modelling and policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. Nguyen, Cuong & Tran, Tuyen & Vu, Huong, 2021. "The Long-Term Effects of War on Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Development: Evidence from Vietnam," MPRA Paper 111891, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Gaffney, F. & Deane, J.P. & Gallachóir, B.P.Ó, 2017. "A 100 year review of electricity policy in Ireland (1916–2015)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 67-79.
    16. Hyland, Marie, 2016. "Restructuring European electricity markets – A panel data analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 33-42.
    17. Qingtao Li & Jianxue Wang & Yao Zhang & Yue Fan & Guojun Bao & Xuebin Wang, 2020. "Multi-Period Generation Expansion Planning for Sustainable Power Systems to Maximize the Utilization of Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Li, Can & Conejo, Antonio J. & Liu, Peng & Omell, Benjamin P. & Siirola, John D. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2022. "Mixed-integer linear programming models and algorithms for generation and transmission expansion planning of power systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1071-1082.
    19. Yamchi, Hamid Bakhshi & Safari, Amin & Guerrero, Josep M., 2021. "A multi-objective mixed integer linear programming model for integrated electricity-gas network expansion planning considering the impact of photovoltaic generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    20. Hagen Worch & Bernhard Truffer & Mundia Kabinga & Jochen Markard & Anton Eberhard, 2012. "Tackling the Capability Gap in Utility Firms: Applying Management Research to Infrastructure Sectors," CID Working Papers 55, Center for International Development at Harvard University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:237:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221018132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.