IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v114y2016icp846-861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing the risk of uncertain wind power generation in flexible power systems using information gap decision theory

Author

Listed:
  • Nikoobakht, Ahmad
  • Aghaei, Jamshid
  • Mardaneh, Mohammad

Abstract

In this paper, a robust solution algorithm has been presented for SCUC problem including the uncertainties of wind power generation (WPG). Different flexibility resources have been considered in the proposed model, namely, transmission switching (TS) action and energy storage (ES) systems for managing the uncertainty risk of significant penetration of WPGs to sustain the load-generation balance. Indeed, the flexibility resources have been allocated using a robust optimization model based on the information gap decision theory (IGDT). That is, the IGDT reveals the robust optimal decision variables against the wind power uncertainties without requiring the probability density function of WPGs that leads to low computational burden. The optimization SCUC model is formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming (MIP), being solved by proposed effective solution strategy based on Benders decomposition (BD) technique. Numerical simulation results on the modified 6-bus system and IEEE 118-bus system, clearly demonstrate the benefits of applying flexibility resources for managing the high penetration of WPG uncertainty and validate the applicability of the proposed IGDT-based SCUC model.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikoobakht, Ahmad & Aghaei, Jamshid & Mardaneh, Mohammad, 2016. "Managing the risk of uncertain wind power generation in flexible power systems using information gap decision theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 846-861.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:114:y:2016:i:c:p:846-861
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216311835
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kharrati, Saeed & Kazemi, Mostafa & Ehsan, Mehdi, 2016. "Equilibria in the competitive retail electricity market considering uncertainty and risk management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 315-328.
    2. Lesley F. Wright, 2004. "Information Gap Decision Theory: Decisions under Severe Uncertainty," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(1), pages 185-186, February.
    3. Quan, Hao & Srinivasan, Dipti & Khosravi, Abbas, 2016. "Integration of renewable generation uncertainties into stochastic unit commitment considering reserve and risk: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 735-745.
    4. Esmaili, Masoud & Ebadi, Fatemeh & Shayanfar, Heidar Ali & Jadid, Shahram, 2013. "Congestion management in hybrid power markets using modified Benders decomposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1004-1012.
    5. Heydarian-Forushani, E. & Golshan, M.E.H. & Shafie-khah, M., 2015. "Flexible security-constrained scheduling of wind power enabling time of use pricing scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1887-1900.
    6. MacGill, Iain, 2010. "Electricity market design for facilitating the integration of wind energy: Experience and prospects with the Australian National Electricity Market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3180-3191, July.
    7. Nikzad, Mehdi & Mozafari, Babak & Bashirvand, Mahdi & Solaymani, Soodabeh & Ranjbar, Ali Mohamad, 2012. "Designing time-of-use program based on stochastic security constrained unit commitment considering reliability index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 541-548.
    8. Aien, Morteza & Hajebrahimi, Ali & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud, 2016. "A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1077-1089.
    9. Moradi-Dalvand, M. & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. & Amjady, N. & Zareipour, H. & Mazhab-Jafari, A., 2015. "Self-scheduling of a wind producer based on Information Gap Decision Theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 588-600.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Long, Huan & Zhang, Zijun & Sun, Mu-Xia & Li, Yan-Fu, 2018. "The data-driven schedule of wind farm power generations and required reserves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 485-495.
    2. Peker, Meltem & Kocaman, Ayse Selin & Kara, Bahar Y., 2018. "Benefits of transmission switching and energy storage in power systems with high renewable energy penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1182-1197.
    3. Nikoobakht, Ahmad & Aghaei, Jamshid & Mardaneh, Mohammad, 2017. "Securing highly penetrated wind energy systems using linearized transmission switching mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1207-1220.
    4. Wang, Sen & Li, Fengting & Zhang, Gaohang & Yin, Chunya, 2023. "Analysis of energy storage demand for peak shaving and frequency regulation of power systems with high penetration of renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    5. Hong Zhang & Hao Sun & Qian Zhang & Guanxun Kong, 2018. "Microgrid Spinning Reserve Optimization with Improved Information Gap Decision Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Alabi, Tobi Michael & Lu, Lin & Yang, Zaiyue, 2021. "A novel multi-objective stochastic risk co-optimization model of a zero-carbon multi-energy system (ZCMES) incorporating energy storage aging model and integrated demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Razavi, Seyed-Ehsan & Esmaeel Nezhad, Ali & Mavalizadeh, Hani & Raeisi, Fatima & Ahmadi, Abdollah, 2018. "Robust hydrothermal unit commitment: A mixed-integer linear framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 593-602.
    8. Nomaguchi, Yutaka & Tanaka, Hiroki & Sakakibara, Akiyuki & Fujita, Kikuo & Kishita, Yusuke & Hara, Keishiro & Uwasu, Michinori, 2017. "Integrated planning of low-voltage power grids and subsidies toward a distributed generation system – Case study of the diffusion of photovoltaics in a Japanese dormitory town," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 779-793.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tabandeh, Abbas & Abdollahi, Amir & Rashidinejad, Masoud, 2016. "Reliability constrained congestion management with uncertain negawatt demand response firms considering repairable advanced metering infrastructures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 213-228.
    2. Talari, Saber & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Osório, Gerardo J. & Aghaei, Jamshid & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "Stochastic modelling of renewable energy sources from operators' point-of-view: A survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1953-1965.
    3. Jordehi, A. Rezaee, 2018. "How to deal with uncertainties in electric power systems? A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 145-155.
    4. Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat & MacGill, Iain F., 2013. "Assessing the value of wind generation in future carbon constrained electricity industries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 400-412.
    5. Simshauser, P., 2019. "On the impact of government-initiated CfD’s in Australia’s National Electricity Market," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1901, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    6. Grover-Silva, Etta & Heleno, Miguel & Mashayekh, Salman & Cardoso, Gonçalo & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, George, 2018. "A stochastic optimal power flow for scheduling flexible resources in microgrids operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 201-208.
    7. Würzburg, Klaas & Labandeira, Xavier & Linares, Pedro, 2013. "Renewable generation and electricity prices: Taking stock and new evidence for Germany and Austria," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(S1), pages 159-171.
    8. Jin, Hongyang & Li, Zhengshuo & Sun, Hongbin & Guo, Qinglai & Chen, Runze & Wang, Bin, 2017. "A robust aggregate model and the two-stage solution method to incorporate energy intensive enterprises in power system unit commitment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1364-1378.
    9. Gianluca Fulli & Marcelo Masera & Catalin Felix Covrig & Francesco Profumo & Ettore Bompard & Tao Huang, 2017. "The EU Electricity Security Decision-Analytic Framework: Status and Perspective Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Xu, Jin & Kanyingi, Peter Kairu & Wang, Keyou & Li, Guojie & Han, Bei & Jiang, Xiuchen, 2017. "Probabilistic small signal stability analysis with large scale integration of wind power considering dependence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1258-1270.
    11. Liu, Jiejie & Li, Yao & Ma, Yanan & Qin, Ruomu & Meng, Xianyang & Wu, Jiangtao, 2023. "Two-layer multiple scenario optimization framework for integrated energy system based on optimal energy contribution ratio strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Davis, Dominic & Brear, Michael J., 2024. "Impact of short-term wind forecast accuracy on the performance of decarbonising wholesale electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    13. Darmani, Anna & Rickne, Annika & Hidalgo, Antonio & Arvidsson, Niklas, 2016. "When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: A review of the tradable green certificate assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-381.
    14. Li, Jinke & Liu, Guy & Shao, Jing, 2020. "Understanding the ROC transfer payment in the renewable obligation with the recycling mechanism in the United Kingdom," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Jin, S.W. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Nie, S., 2018. "Analyzing the performance of clean development mechanism for electric power systems under uncertain environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 382-397.
    16. Simshauser, Paul, 2022. "Rooftop solar PV and the peak load problem in the NEM's Queensland region," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Xing Chen & Suhua Lou & Yanjie Liang & Yaowu Wu & Xianglu He, 2021. "Optimal Scheduling of a Regional Power System Aiming at Accommodating Clean Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Ben Christopher, S.J. & Carolin Mabel, M., 2020. "A bio-inspired approach for probabilistic energy management of micro-grid incorporating uncertainty in statistical cost estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    19. Elliston, Ben & MacGill, Iain & Diesendorf, Mark, 2013. "Least cost 100% renewable electricity scenarios in the Australian National Electricity Market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 270-282.
    20. Simshauser, P. & Gilmore, J., 2020. "Is the NEM broken? Policy discontinuity and the 2017-2020 investment megacycle," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2048, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:114:y:2016:i:c:p:846-861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.