IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v322y2025i3p841-853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of vendor preferences on Commission Policy of E-Commerce platform

Author

Listed:
  • Dai, Jiansheng
  • Zhang, Xinyu

Abstract

In the prevalent online marketplaces, vendors manage daily operations while e-commerce platforms (EPs) that provide auxiliary services and charge commission fees. Two commission policies are examined in this article: Fixed Commission Policy (FCP), involving a fixed usage fee, and Ordinary Commission Policy (OCP), incorporating an additional fee proportional to sales revenue alongside the fixed usage fee, with this proportion referred to as the commission rate. We develop a two-stage game-theoretical model of an e-commerce supply chain, wherein the EP sets the commission policy and a risk-sensitive vendor determines its stock level. The vendor's risk attitude is characterized by three key preferences: reference preference, utility weight preference, and loss aversion preference. Under reasonable assumptions, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the game equilibrium, yielding several key insights: (i) Vendor preferences significantly influence the commission policy, with reference preference being central in shaping the optimal commission rate. Specifically, while the FCP is optimal for risk-neutral vendors, it may not be suitable when vendors are risk-sensitive. (ii) The ratio of unit cost to retail price is the primary driver of variations in optimal commission rate. Moreover, the optimal commission rate tends to decrease as this ratio increases. (iii) In the presence of risk sensitivity, a commission policy maximizing the EP's profit can lead to Pareto improvement compared to one aimed at centralized profit maximization. Our analysis offers valuable insights into the design of commission policies for EPs, providing credible explanations for various economic phenomena associated with these policies in e-commerce practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Dai, Jiansheng & Zhang, Xinyu, 2025. "Impact of vendor preferences on Commission Policy of E-Commerce platform," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(3), pages 841-853.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:322:y:2025:i:3:p:841-853
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.11.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724009226
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.11.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Janice E. Carrillo, 2017. "Strategic Analysis of the Agency Model for Digital Goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 724-741, April.
    2. Benjamin Balzer & Antonio Rosato, 2021. "Expectations-Based Loss Aversion in Auctions with Interdependent Values: Extensive vs. Intensive Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 1056-1074, February.
    3. Botond Kőszegi & Matthew Rabin, 2006. "A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(4), pages 1133-1165.
    4. Xie, Wei & Yu, Huilin & Zhong, Yuanguang & Zhou, Yong-Wu, 2024. "Impact of loss aversion on financing mechanism preference under consignment: Direct vs. Guarantee," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 206-228.
    5. Lijun Ma & Weili Xue & Yingxue Zhao & Qinghua Zeng, 2016. "Loss-averse newsvendor problem with supply risk," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(2), pages 214-228, February.
    6. Opher Baron & Ming Hu & Sami Najafi-Asadolahi & Qu Qian, 2015. "Newsvendor Selling to Loss-Averse Consumers with Stochastic Reference Points," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 456-469, October.
    7. Diwakar Gupta & Yibin Chen, 2020. "Retailer-Direct Financing Contracts Under Consignment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 528-544, May.
    8. Mohammed Abdellaoui & Han Bleichrodt & Corina Paraschiv, 2007. "Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(10), pages 1659-1674, October.
    9. Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, 1991. "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(4), pages 1039-1061.
    10. Hu, Benyong & Meng, Chao & Xu, Dong & Son, Young-Jun, 2016. "Three-echelon supply chain coordination with a loss-averse retailer and revenue sharing contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 192-202.
    11. Yinghao Zhang & Karen Donohue & Tony Haitao Cui, 2016. "Contract Preferences and Performance for the Loss-Averse Supplier: Buyback vs. Revenue Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1734-1754, June.
    12. Tversky, Amos & Slovic, Paul & Kahneman, Daniel, 1990. "The Causes of Preference Reversal," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(1), pages 204-217, March.
    13. Li, Jun & Shen, Wenjing & Liao, Yi & Cai, Gangshu & Chen, Xiangfeng, 2024. "The fulfillment service in online marketplaces," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1139-1152.
    14. Mahesh Nagarajan & Steven Shechter, 2014. "Prospect Theory and the Newsvendor Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 1057-1062, April.
    15. Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Liang Shen, 2019. "Study on the decision-making and coordination of an e-commerce supply chain with manufacturer fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 2788-2808, May.
    16. Enrico G. De Giorgi & Thierry Post, 2011. "Loss Aversion with a State-Dependent Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1094-1110, June.
    17. Chan, Chi Kin & Zhou, Yan & Wong, Kar Hung, 2019. "An equilibrium model of the supply chain network under multi-attribute behaviors analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 514-535.
    18. Wang, Chengfu & Fan, Xiaojun & Yin, Zhe, 2019. "Financing online retailers: Bank vs. electronic business platform, equilibrium, and coordinating strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 343-356.
    19. Shaofu Du & Yujiao Zhu & Tengfei Nie & Haisuo Yu, 2018. "Loss-averse preferences in a two-echelon supply chain with yield risk and demand uncertainty," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 361-388, July.
    20. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    21. Guoming Lai & Huihui Liu & Wenqiang Xiao & Xinyi Zhao, 2022. "“Fulfilled by Amazon”: A Strategic Perspective of Competition at the e-Commerce Platform," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 1406-1420, May.
    22. Bhavani Shanker Uppari & Sameer Hasija, 2019. "Modeling Newsvendor Behavior: A Prospect Theory Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 481-500, July.
    23. Wang, Charles X. & Webster, Scott, 2009. "The loss-averse newsvendor problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 93-105, February.
    24. Maurice E. Schweitzer & Gérard P. Cachon, 2000. "Decision Bias in the Newsvendor Problem with a Known Demand Distribution: Experimental Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 404-420, March.
    25. Qin, Xuelian & Liu, Zhixue & Tian, Lin, 2021. "The optimal combination between selling mode and logistics service strategy in an e-commerce market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 639-651.
    26. Daniel Kahneman & Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, 1991. "Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 193-206, Winter.
    27. Botond Koszegi & Matthew Rabin, 2007. "Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1047-1073, September.
    28. Yunzeng Wang & Li Jiang & Zuo-Jun Shen, 2004. "Channel Performance Under Consignment Contract with Revenue Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 34-47, January.
    29. Xiaoyang Long & Javad Nasiry, 2015. "Prospect Theory Explains Newsvendor Behavior: The Role of Reference Points," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 3009-3012, December.
    30. Justin Jia, 2016. "Managing the Revenue of Sales Platforms: Insights into Service Fees," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(6), pages 1026-1037, June.
    31. Sugden, Robert, 2003. "Reference-dependent subjective expected utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 172-191, August.
    32. Xue Dong He & Moris S. Strub, 2022. "How Endogenization of the Reference Point Affects Loss Aversion: A Study of Portfolio Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3035-3053, November.
    33. Vipin, B. & Amit, R.K., 2017. "Loss aversion and rationality in the newsvendor problem under recourse option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 563-571.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bai, Tian & Feng, Gengzhong & Wu, Meng & Zhu, Stuart X., 2025. "A newsvendor model with multiple reference points: Target-setting for aspirational newsvendors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(3), pages 655-669.
    2. Wei, Ying & Xiong, Sijia & Li, Feng, 2019. "Ordering bias with two reference profits: Exogenous benchmark and minimum requirement," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 229-250.
    3. Bai, Tian & Wu, Meng & Zhu, Stuart X., 2019. "Pricing and ordering by a loss averse newsvendor with reference dependence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 343-365.
    4. Qingwei Wang & Meimei Zheng & Wei Weng, 2023. "Sourcing decisions with loss aversion under yield and demand randomness," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(2), pages 661-710, June.
    5. Bhavani Shanker Uppari & Sameer Hasija, 2019. "Modeling Newsvendor Behavior: A Prospect Theory Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 481-500, July.
    6. Wei Liu & Shiji Song & Ying Qiao & Han Zhao & Huachang Wang, 2020. "The Loss-Averse Newsvendor Problem with Random Yield and Reference Dependence," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Liu, Yang & Tian, Jun & Yu, Ning, 2025. "Prepositioning of emergency supplies and channel coordination: Considering a loss-averse supplier and government penalty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    8. Zhang, Yu & Yi, Yuyin, 2024. "Sustainable production strategies of loss-averse competitive manufacturers with reference dependence under cap-and-trade policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Yan, Nina & Xu, Xun & Huang, Wenyi, 2021. "Supplier's capacity investment strategy with factoring finance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    10. Kirshner, Samuel N. & Shao, Lusheng, 2018. "Internal and external reference effects in a two-tier supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 944-957.
    11. Xie, Wei & Yu, Huilin & Zhong, Yuanguang & Zhou, Yong-Wu, 2024. "Impact of loss aversion on financing mechanism preference under consignment: Direct vs. Guarantee," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 206-228.
    12. Zhou, Yan & Chan, Chi Kin & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A multi-period supply chain network equilibrium model considering retailers’ uncertain demands and dynamic loss-averse behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 51-76.
    13. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ballester, 2009. "A theory of reference-dependent behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(3), pages 427-455, September.
    14. Ulrich Schmidt & Horst Zank, 2012. "A genuine foundation for prospect theory," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 97-113, October.
    15. Yu, Ning & Tian, Jun & Feng, Gengzhong & Liu, Yang & Moshtari, Mohammad, 2025. "Managing production capacity reserves for emergency supplies: A public-private option contract model with a loss-averse supplier," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Edoardo Grillo, 2014. "Reference Dependence and Politicians' Credibility," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 353, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    17. Simon Gächter & Eric J. Johnson & Andreas Herrmann, 2022. "Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 599-624, April.
    18. Wenhui Zhou & Dongmei Wang & Weixiang Huang & Pengfei Guo, 2021. "To Pool or Not to Pool? The Effect of Loss Aversion on Queue Configurations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4258-4272, November.
    19. Wang, Jianli & Liu, Liqun & Neilson, William S., 2020. "The participation puzzle with reference-dependent expected utility preferences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 278-287.
    20. Zhihua Li & Songfa Zhong, 2023. "Reference Dependence in Intertemporal Preference," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 475-490, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:322:y:2025:i:3:p:841-853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.