IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v508y2025ics0304380025001875.html

Evaluating the Dynamics of Brazil's soybean trade: a comprehensive emergy analysis of resource dependencies

Author

Listed:
  • Leão, Cláudia
  • Terra dos Santos, Luiz C.
  • Giannetti, Biagio F.
  • Agostinho, Feni
  • Almeida, Cecilia M.V.B.

Abstract

This study examines Brazil's soybean trade through the dual lens of economic and environmental considerations, employing emergy synthesis to reveal hidden resource dependencies and costs within production and export processes. It bridges ecological modeling and sustainability science by analyzing Brazil's soybean trade through the interplay of economic and environmental dimensions. By applying emergy-based indices—such as the Emergy Exchange Ratio, Emergy Benefit Ratio, and Opportunity Ratio - the analysis offers a nuanced understanding of trade dynamics between 2015 and 2019, particularly with partners like China and Europe. The trade with China showed an average EER of 0.27, meaning that for every unit of emergy value Brazil exported in raw soybeans, it received substantially more emergy in currency terms. In comparison, trade with European partners, such as Spain and The Netherlands, with EE>1, was notably unfavorable for Brazil. The Opportunity Ratio is another key metric to indicate the potential economic gains from processing raw soybean commodities domestically. The analysis revealed that, on average, domestic processing could potentially lead to a GDP increase of 17 % from the soybean sector. Highlighting the environmental implications of reliance on non-renewable inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides, the study underscores the potential benefits of domestic soybean processing for enhancing GDP, reducing import dependency, and fostering equitable resource use. The research provides insights into sustainability through carefully integrating economic and ecological perspectives, informing strategies for addressing environmental costs while fostering balanced global trade practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Leão, Cláudia & Terra dos Santos, Luiz C. & Giannetti, Biagio F. & Agostinho, Feni & Almeida, Cecilia M.V.B., 2025. "Evaluating the Dynamics of Brazil's soybean trade: a comprehensive emergy analysis of resource dependencies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001875
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001875
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Xinyu & Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Zhifeng & Chen, Bin & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "Comparing national environmental and economic performances through emergy sustainability indicators: Moving environmental ethics beyond anthropocentrism toward ecocentrism," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1532-1542.
    2. Tony Heron & Patricia Prado & Chris West, 2018. "Global Value Chains and the Governance of ‘Embedded’ Food Commodities: The Case of Soy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(S2), pages 29-37, October.
    3. Eyni-Nargeseh, Hamed & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Rahimi-Moghaddam, Sajjad & Gilani, Abdolali & Damghani, Abdolmajid Mahdavi & Azizi, Khosro, 2023. "Which rice farming system is more environmentally friendly in Khuzestan province, Iran? A study based on emergy analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    4. Du, Hailong & Yang, Liu & Wang, Wenzhong & Lu, Lunhui & Li, Zhe, 2022. "Emergy theory to quantify the sustainability of large cascade hydropower projects in the upper Yangtze," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    5. Edrisi, Sheikh Adil & Sahiba, Sheikh Arshiya & Chen, Bin & Abhilash, P.C., 2022. "Emergy-based sustainability analysis of bioenergy production from marginal and degraded lands of India," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    6. João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis & Pedro Sanches Amorim & José António Sarsfield Pereira Cabral & Rodrigo Carlo Toloi, 2020. "The Impact of Logistics Performance on Argentina, Brazil, and the US Soybean Exports from 2012 to 2018: A Gravity Model Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Pietro Barbieri & Graham K. MacDonald & Antoine Bernard de Raymond & Thomas Nesme, 2022. "Food system resilience to phosphorus shortages on a telecoupled planet," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(2), pages 114-122, February.
    8. Cristian Méndez Rodríguez & Juliana Salazar Benítez & Carlos Felipe Rengifo Rodas & Juan Carlos Corrales & Apolinar Figueroa Casas, 2022. "A Multidisciplinary Approach Integrating Emergy Analysis and Process Modeling for Agricultural Systems Sustainable Management—Coffee Farm Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Giannetti, B.F. & Ogura, Y. & Bonilla, S.H. & Almeida, C.M.V.B., 2011. "Accounting emergy flows to determine the best production model of a coffee plantation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7399-7407.
    10. Samaniego, Pablo & Vallejo, María Cristina & Martínez-Alier, Joan, 2017. "Commercial and biophysical deficits in South America, 1990–2013," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 62-73.
    11. Motakefi, Mahdi & Dahmardeh, Mehdi & Ghanbari, Seyed Ahmad & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza, 2025. "A comparative study of production systems in the Goharkuh Taftan complex utilising emergy and economic analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 500(C).
    12. André Nassif & Luiz Carlos Bresser-Pereira & Carmem Feijo, 2018. "The case for reindustrialisation in developing countries: towards the connection between the macroeconomic regime and the industrial policy in Brazil [The economic implications of learning-by-doing," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(2), pages 355-381.
    13. Yu, Xiaoman & Geng, Yong & Dong, Huijuan & Ulgiati, Sergio & Liu, Zhe & Liu, Zuoxi & Ma, Zhixiao & Tian, Xu & Sun, Lu, 2016. "Sustainability assessment of one industrial region: A combined method of emergy analysis and IPAT (Human Impact Population Affluence Technology)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 818-830.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xianzhu & Huang, He & Hong, Jingke & Ni, Danfei & He, Rongxiao, 2020. "A spatiotemporal investigation of energy-driven factors in China: A region-based structural decomposition analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    2. Nassif, André & Morandi, Lucilene & Araújo, Eliane & Feijó, Carmem, 2020. "Economic development and stagnation in Brazil (1950–2011)," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos & Feijó, Carmem & Araújo, Eliane Cristina, 2025. "The determination of the exchange rate: A new-developmental approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 245-255.
    4. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    5. Agostinho, F. & Oliveira, M.W. & Pulselli, F.M. & Almeida, C.M.V.B. & Giannetti, B.F., 2019. "Emergy accounting as a support for a strategic planning towards a regional sustainable milk production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos & Feijó, Carmem & Araújo, Eliane Cristina de, 2021. "Do liberal policy regimes condemn Latin America to quasi-stagnation?," Textos para discussão 541, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    7. Clasen, Arno P. & Agostinho, Feni & Sulis, Federico & Almeida, Cecília M.V.B & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2024. "Unlocking the potential of municipal solid waste: Emergy accounting applied in a novel biorefinery," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    8. Zhang, Can & Su, Bo & Beckmann, Michael & Volk, Martin, 2024. "Emergy-based evaluation of ecosystem services: Progress and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Hu, Miao & Bian, Yongtao & Ji, Guangxing, 2025. "Assessing the sustainability of China's coastal regions: A perspective on local coupling and telecoupling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 501(C).
    10. Moritz Laber & Peter Klimek & Martin Bruckner & Liuhuaying Yang & Stefan Thurner, 2022. "Shock propagation from the Russia-Ukraine conflict on international multilayer food production network determines global food availability," Papers 2210.01846, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    11. Guangdong Wu & Guofeng Qiang & Jian Zuo & Xianbo Zhao & Ruidong Chang, 2018. "What are the Key Indicators of Mega Sustainable Construction Projects? —A Stakeholder-Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Junxue Zhang & Lin Ma, 2021. "Urban ecological security dynamic analysis based on an innovative emergy ecological footprint method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16163-16191, November.
    13. Winston Jerónimo Silvestre & Ana Fonseca & Sandra Naomi Morioka, 2022. "Strategic sustainability integration: Merging management tools to support business model decisions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2052-2067, July.
    14. Marley Nunes Vituri Toloi & Silvia Helena Bonilla & Rodrigo Carlo Toloi & Helton Raimundo Oliveira Silva & Irenilza de Alencar Nääs, 2021. "Development Indicators and Soybean Production in Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Xinyu Liu & Daan Schraven & Mark de Bruijne & Martin de Jong & Marcel Hertogh, 2019. "Navigating Transitions for Sustainable Infrastructures—The Case of a New High-Speed Railway Station in Jingmen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Giuseppina Colaleo & Federico Nardo & Arianna Azzellino & Diego Vicinanza, 2022. "Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms in Adriatic Sea: The Total Removal Option from a Life Cycle Assessment Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Jiangtao Hong & Bo Pang & Lirong Zhao & Shumiao Shu & Puyu Feng & Fang Liu & Ziyin Du & Xiaodan Wang, 2025. "Soil phosphorus crisis in the Tibetan alpine permafrost region," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Chih‐Yu Yang & Ching‐Cheng Lu & Yung‐Ho Chiu & Tai‐Yu Lin, 2022. "Analysis of coffee production efficiency and productivity strategy in African and non‐African countries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 946-969, October.
    19. Tan, Kangming & Li, Yuliang & Chen, Yun & Liu, Fangdan & Ou, Jingmin & Zhang, Yuhan & Wang, Xiaolong, 2022. "Modified framework to reflect contribution of soil storage in emergy synthesis under different agricultural practices at farm level," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    20. Henrietta Dorfmüller & Wangui Kimotho & Isabel Ebert & Pascal Dey & Florian Wettstein, 2024. "Responsible Business Conduct in Commodity Trading—A Multidisciplinary Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 449-473, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:508:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.