IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8931-d867935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multidisciplinary Approach Integrating Emergy Analysis and Process Modeling for Agricultural Systems Sustainable Management—Coffee Farm Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Méndez Rodríguez

    (Environmental Studies Group (GEA), Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Cauca, Popayán 190002, Colombia
    Intelligent Management System (IMS), Faculty of Engineering, University Foundation of Popayán, Popayán 190002, Colombia)

  • Juliana Salazar Benítez

    (Environmental Studies Group (GEA), Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Cauca, Popayán 190002, Colombia)

  • Carlos Felipe Rengifo Rodas

    (Automatic Investigation Group, Department of Electronics, Instrumentation and Control, University of Cauca, Popayán 190002, Colombia)

  • Juan Carlos Corrales

    (Telematic Engineering Group (GIT), Department of Telematics, University of Cauca, Popayán 190002, Colombia)

  • Apolinar Figueroa Casas

    (Environmental Studies Group (GEA), Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Cauca, Popayán 190002, Colombia)

Abstract

Agricultural production operates via the existing relationships between nature and economy. Its sustainable development requires tools that provide a broad vision of the energy flows that intervene in these systems, to support the decision-making process in energy management. To quantify the environmental resources and economic inputs involved, emergy analysis has been used, as well as process modeling, to make a detailed record of the system inputs. The research aim is to propose a multidisciplinary approach that integrates emergy analysis and process modeling in agricultural systems, promoting their sustainable management. This approach was validated in the Los Naranjos coffee farm in Popayán, Colombia, during the years 2018–2020. The results show that the farm achieved its best energy performance and was more sustainable in 2020, producing 1693 kg/ha of green coffee, with the lowest Unit Emergy Value (UEV; 1.12 × 10 6 seJ/J) and the highest Emergy Sustainability Index (0.24), for the three years analyzed. In addition, natural inputs contribute approximately 27% of the total emergy, and those from the economy contribute 73%. In conclusion, this approach allows a precise and complete analysis of the system’s energy flows, significant energy uses, and energy sources at each production process stage, helping to establish the basis for an energy management system. We consider that the proposed multidisciplinary approach is a tool that would help in the sustainable management of any agricultural system, and its implementation and comparison in various contexts would be important.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Méndez Rodríguez & Juliana Salazar Benítez & Carlos Felipe Rengifo Rodas & Juan Carlos Corrales & Apolinar Figueroa Casas, 2022. "A Multidisciplinary Approach Integrating Emergy Analysis and Process Modeling for Agricultural Systems Sustainable Management—Coffee Farm Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8931-:d:867935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8931/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8931/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatriz Queiróz dos Reis & Danny Alexander Rojas Moreno & Rafael Araújo Nacimento & Vitória Toffolo Luiz & Laya Kannan Silva Alves & Biagio Fernando Giannetti & Augusto Hauber Gameiro, 2021. "Economic and Environmental Assessment Using Emergy of Sheep Production in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Giannetti, B.F. & Ogura, Y. & Bonilla, S.H. & Almeida, C.M.V.B., 2011. "Accounting emergy flows to determine the best production model of a coffee plantation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7399-7407.
    3. David Pimentel, 2009. "Energy Inputs in Food Crop Production in Developing and Developed Nations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Frederic Marimon & Martí Casadesús, 2017. "Reasons to Adopt ISO 50001 Energy Management System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wadim Strielkowski & Anna Sherstobitova & Patrik Rovny & Tatiana Evteeva, 2021. "Increasing Energy Efficiency and Modernization of Energy Systems in Russia: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Shah, Syed Mahboob & Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Qing & Casazza, Marco & Agostinho, Feni & Giannetti, Biagio F., 2021. "Sustainability assessment of agriculture production systems in Pakistan: A provincial-scale energy-based evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    3. María José Ibarrola-Rivas & Thomas Kastner & Sanderine Nonhebel, 2016. "How Much Time Does a Farmer Spend to Produce My food? An International Comparison of the Impact of Diets and Mechanization," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Kaur, Navneet & Vashist, Krishan Kumar & Brar, A.S., 2021. "Energy and productivity analysis of maize based crop sequences compared to rice-wheat system under different moisture regimes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Liudmyla Davydenko & Nina Davydenko & Andrii Bosak & Alla Bosak & Agnieszka Deja & Tygran Dzhuguryan, 2022. "Smart Sustainable Freight Transport for a City Multi-Floor Manufacturing Cluster: A Framework of the Energy Efficiency Monitoring of Electric Vehicle Fleet Charging," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Agostinho, F. & Oliveira, M.W. & Pulselli, F.M. & Almeida, C.M.V.B. & Giannetti, B.F., 2019. "Emergy accounting as a support for a strategic planning towards a regional sustainable milk production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Houshyar, Ehsan & Azadi, Hossein & Almassi, Morteza & Sheikh Davoodi, Mohammad Javad & Witlox, Frank, 2012. "Sustainable and efficient energy consumption of corn production in Southwest Iran: Combination of multi-fuzzy and DEA modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 672-681.
    8. Sanzidur Rahman & Basanta Kumar Barmon, 2018. "Total Factor Energy Productivity and Efficiency Changes of the Gher (Prawn-Carp-Rice) Farming System in Bangladesh: A Stochastic Input Distance Function Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Giannetti, B.F. & Demétrio, J.F.C. & Bonilla, S.H. & Agostinho, F. & Almeida, C.M.V.B., 2013. "Emergy diagnosis and reflections towards Brazilian sustainable development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1002-1012.
    10. Wang, Xiaolong & Li, Zhejin & Long, Pan & Yan, Lingling & Gao, Wangsheng & Chen, Yuanquan & Sui, Peng, 2017. "Sustainability evaluation of recycling in agricultural systems by emergy accounting," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 114-124.
    11. Inas El-Gafy & Defne Apul, 2021. "Expanding the Dynamic Modeling of Water-Food-Energy Nexus to Include Environmental, Economic, and Social Aspects Based on Life Cycle Assessment Thinking," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(13), pages 4349-4362, October.
    12. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin, 2014. "Energy efficiency and sustainability of complex biogas systems: A 3-level emergetic evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 151-163.
    13. Jan Kaselofsky & Marika Rošā & Anda Jekabsone & Solenne Favre & Gabriel Loustalot & Michaël Toma & Jose Pablo Delgado Marín & Manuel Moreno Nicolás & Emanuele Cosenza, 2021. "Getting Municipal Energy Management Systems ISO 50001 Certified: A Study with 28 European Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Muazu, A. & Yahya, A. & Ishak, W.I.W. & Khairunniza-Bejo, S., 2015. "Energy audit for sustainable wetland paddy cultivation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 182-191.
    15. Noor Shakir Mahmood & Ahmed Ali Ajmi & Shamsul Bin Sarip & Hazilah Mad Kaidi & Khairur Rijal Jamaludin & Hayati Habibah Abdul Talib, 2022. "Modeling the Sustainable Integration of Quality and Energy Management in Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Liang, Long & Lal, Rattan & Ridoutt, Bradley G. & Zhao, Guishen & Du, Zhangliu & Li, Li & Feng, Dangyang & Wang, Liyuan & Peng, Peng & Hang, Sheng & Wu, Wenliang, 2018. "Multi-indicator assessment of a water-saving agricultural engineering project in North Beijing, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 34-46.
    17. Carlos Herce & Enrico Biele & Chiara Martini & Marcello Salvio & Claudia Toro, 2021. "Impact of Energy Monitoring and Management Systems on the Implementation and Planning of Energy Performance Improved Actions: An Empirical Analysis Based on Energy Audits in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Julian Löbbers & Sebastian Lins & Theresa Kromat & Alexander Benlian & Ali Sunyaev, 2022. "A multi-perspective lens on web assurance seals: contrasting vendors’ intended and consumers’ perceived effects," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1573-1615, December.
    19. Adila El Maghraoui & Younes Ledmaoui & Oussama Laayati & Hicham El Hadraoui & Ahmed Chebak, 2022. "Smart Energy Management: A Comparative Study of Energy Consumption Forecasting Algorithms for an Experimental Open-Pit Mine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    20. Nolte, Kerstin & Ostermeier, Martin, 2017. "Labour Market Effects of Large-Scale Agricultural Investment: Conceptual Considerations and Estimated Employment Effects," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 430-446.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8931-:d:867935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.