IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v201y2025ip2s0960077925012779.html

A layered strategy updating mechanism for spatial public goods game with punishment

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yongqiang
  • Zheng, Zehao
  • Zhang, Xiaoming
  • Ma, Jinlong

Abstract

Cooperation is essential in human societies, yet fostering it among agents remains a longstanding challenge in evolutionary game theory. Among various mechanisms developed to sustain cooperation, punishment has emerged as an effective means to suppress defection and encourage cooperative behavior. Classical strategy updating rules such as the Fermi rule and Q-learning have therefore been widely applied in spatial public goods game to simulate the evolution of such mechanisms. However, these traditional mechanisms are often limited in their adaptability and struggle to maintain cooperation under harsh or dynamically changing conditions. To overcome these limitations, we propose an effective layered strategy updating mechanism for the spatial public goods game with punishment, which combines the network reciprocity of the Fermi rule with the self-learning capability of Q-learning by employing a layered process in which an agent first attempts to imitate a neighbor according to the Fermi rule, and, with the complementary probability, updates its strategy using the ϵ-greedy strategy from Q-learning. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed layered strategy updating mechanism significantly improves cooperation compared to using either the Fermi rule or Q-learning alone. Lower punishment costs and higher fines are both found to promote higher levels of cooperation within the population. It is interesting to note that at equilibrium, the percentage of cooperators is constantly marginally greater than the percentage of punishers. In particular, increasing the punishment probability suppresses cooperation when the cost α exceeds the fine β and r is small, but promotes cooperation for larger r or when α is not greater than β. In addition, the influence of the discount factor γ on cooperation follows a non-monotonic pattern. Overall, this study provides a useful perspective on combining network reciprocity with self-learning and offers a potential foundation for further exploring complex evolutionary mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yongqiang & Zheng, Zehao & Zhang, Xiaoming & Ma, Jinlong, 2025. "A layered strategy updating mechanism for spatial public goods game with punishment," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p2:s0960077925012779
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925012779
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ding, Rui & Wang, Xianjia & Quan, Ji & Ma, Shuting & Zhao, Jinhua, 2025. "Evolutionary dynamics of spatial public goods games with insurance mechanisms," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Andreoni, James, 1988. "Why free ride? : Strategies and learning in public goods experiments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 291-304, December.
    3. Ding, Rui & Wang, Xianjia & Quan, Ji & Ma, Shuting & Zhao, Jinhua, 2025. "The evolution of cooperation and punishment in spatial public goods games with bribery," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Cao, Xian-Bin & Du, Wen-Bo & Rong, Zhi-Hai, 2010. "The evolutionary public goods game on scale-free networks with heterogeneous investment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(6), pages 1273-1280.
    5. Zhang, Haifeng & Yang, Hanxin & Du, Wenbo & Wang, Binghong & Cao, Xianbin, 2010. "Evolutionary public goods games on scale-free networks with unequal payoff allocation mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(5), pages 1099-1104.
    6. Quan, Ji & Cui, Shihui & Chen, Wenman & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Reputation-based probabilistic punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    7. Dawes, Robyn M & Thaler, Richard H, 1988. "Anomalies: Cooperation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 2(3), pages 187-197, Summer.
    8. Martin Sefton & Robert Shupp & James M. Walker, 2007. "The Effect Of Rewards And Sanctions In Provision Of Public Goods," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 45(4), pages 671-690, October.
    9. Yang, Zhengzhi & Zheng, Lei & Perc, Matjaž & Li, Yumeng, 2024. "Interaction state Q-learning promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    10. Wang, Pai & Yang, Zhihu, 2024. "The double-edged sword effect of conformity on cooperation in spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Games with reinforcement learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Simon Gachter & Ernst Fehr, 2000. "Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 980-994, September.
    12. Karl Sigmund & Hannelore De Silva & Arne Traulsen & Christoph Hauert, 2010. "Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7308), pages 861-863, August.
    13. Zhang, Yali & Lu, Yikang & Jin, Haoyu & Dong, Yuting & Du, Chunpeng & Shi, Lei, 2024. "The impact of dynamic reward on cooperation in the spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Lv, Shaojie & Li, Jiaying & Zhao, Changheng, 2025. "Reinforcement learning in spatial public goods games with environmental feedbacks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Shen, Yong & Ma, Yujie & Kang, Hongwei & Sun, Xingping & Chen, Qingyi, 2024. "Learning and propagation: Evolutionary dynamics in spatial public goods games through combined Q-learning and Fermi rule," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    16. Ding, Zhen-Wei & Zhang, Ji-Qiang & Zheng, Guo-Zhong & Cai, Wei-Ran & Cai, Chao-Ran & Chen, Li & Wang, Xu-Ming, 2024. "Emergence of anti-coordinated patterns in snowdrift game by reinforcement learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Jia, Danyang & Li, Tong & Zhao, Yang & Zhang, Xiaoqin & Wang, Zhen, 2022. "Empty nodes affect conditional cooperation under reinforcement learning," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    18. Shen, Shaofei & Zhang, Xuejun & Xu, Aobo & Duan, Taisen, 2024. "An adaptive exploration mechanism for Q-learning in spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 189(P1).
    19. Ma, Xiaojian & Quan, Ji & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Effect of reputation-based heterogeneous investment on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    20. Quan, Ji & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Information fusion based on reputation and payoff promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Kai & Szolnoki, Attila, 2026. "Reinforcement learning in evolutionary game theory: A brief review of recent developments," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 510(C).
    2. Kang, Hongwei & Jiang, Chao & Shen, Yong & Sun, Xingping & Chen, Qingyi, 2025. "Neighbor-aware reinforcement learning fosters cooperation in spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P3).
    3. Wang, Jianwei & Yu, Fengyuan & He, Jialu & Chen, Wei & Xu, Wenshu & Dai, Wenhui & Ming, Yuexin, 2023. "Promotion, Disintegration and Remediation of group cooperation under heterogeneous distribution system based on peer rating," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Lv, Shaojie & Li, Jiaying & Zhao, Changheng, 2025. "Reinforcement learning in spatial public goods games with environmental feedbacks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Yang, Zhaoqilin & Li, Chanchan & Wang, Xin & Tian, Youliang, 2025. "PPO-ACT: Proximal policy optimization with adversarial curriculum transfer for spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P2).
    6. Shi, Dong-Mei & Wang, Bing-Hong, 2017. "Critical mass of public goods and its coevolution with cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 477(C), pages 85-90.
    7. Xie, Kai & Szolnoki, Attila, 2025. "Reputation in public goods cooperation under double Q-learning protocol," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Zhang, Yao & Hao, Qing-Yi & Qian, Jia-Li & Wu, Chao-Yun & Guo, Ning & Ling, Xiang, 2024. "The cooperative evolution in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game with the local loyalty of two-strategy," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    9. Hyoyoung Kim & Doruk İriş & Jinkwon Lee & Alessandro Tavoni, 2025. "Representation, Peer Pressure and Punishment in a Public Goods Game," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(5), pages 1407-1433, May.
    10. Kang, Hongwei & Guo, Yuzeng & Shen, Yong & Sun, Xingping & Chen, Qingyi & Peng, Xiangyue, 2025. "Evolution of fully continuous strategies: Spatial Public Goods Game based on Differential Evolution," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 200(P2).
    11. Murnighan, J. Keith & Wang, Long, 2016. "The social world as an experimental game," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 80-94.
    12. Shen, Yong & Ma, Yujie & Kang, Hongwei & Sun, Xingping & Chen, Qingyi, 2024. "Learning and propagation: Evolutionary dynamics in spatial public goods games through combined Q-learning and Fermi rule," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Fangfang Tan, 2008. "Punishment in a Linear Public Good Game with Productivity Heterogeneity," De Economist, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 269-293, September.
    14. Grigoriadis, Theocharis, 2017. "Religion, administration & public goods: Experimental evidence from Russia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 42-60.
    15. Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gaechter, 2008. "Heterogeneous Social Preferences And The Dynamics Of Free Riding In Public Good Experiments," Discussion Papers 2008-07, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    16. Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2012. "Promoting Cooperation: the Distribution of Reward and Punishment Power," Discussion Papers 2012-08, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    17. Bodo Sturm & Joachim Weimann, 2006. "Experiments in Environmental Economics and Some Close Relatives," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 419-457, July.
    18. Abhijit Ramalingam & Brock V. Stoddard, 2021. "Does reducing inequality increase cooperation?​," GRU Working Paper Series GRU_2021_022, City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics and Finance, Global Research Unit.
    19. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Reputation-based discount effect in imitation on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
    20. Thomas Markussen & Louis Putterman & Jean-Robert Tyran, 2011. "Self-Organization for Collective Action: An Experimental Study of Voting on Formal, Informal, and No Sanction Regimes," Working Papers 2011-4, Brown University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p2:s0960077925012779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.