IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v81y2023ics1043951x23001244.html

Revisiting income inequality among households: New evidence from the Chinese Household Income Project

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zheng-Xin
  • Jv, Yue-Qi

Abstract

The Gini coefficient has been widely used as a key indicator to measure income inequality. However, differences in the measurement methods and information in the sample are the main reasons for the bias in the Gini coefficient in China. In order to improve the accuracy of the measurement, we revisit income inequality among Chinese families and propose a multi-group Gini coefficient method from the perspective of optimizing the income distribution function. Based on the disposable income of households in the Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP), a generalized logistic distribution function is used to measure national, urban and rural Gini coefficients and their contribution rates. The results indicate that: The multi-group Gini coefficient method based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm makes full use of valid microdata-related information, improves the accuracy of traditional methods of fitting urban or rural income distribution and reduces measurement bias based on the realities of China's binary economic structure and the large size of the population. Overall, the income inequality in China has widened over the five-year period from 2013 to 2018. On the one hand, it has been consistently found that the urban-rural income gap is the most important source of income inequality in China (making a contribution exceeding 50%); on the other hand, the contribution of income inequality within urban areas has increased significantly. Education and industry of urban and rural households as well as the difference in their rates of return are the main causes of the income gap between the urban and rural areas in China. Addressing the root causes of income inequality warrants the creation of institutional conditions for equitable access and points of departure in education and industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zheng-Xin & Jv, Yue-Qi, 2023. "Revisiting income inequality among households: New evidence from the Chinese Household Income Project," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s1043951x23001244
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X23001244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fontanari, Andrea & Taleb, Nassim Nicholas & Cirillo, Pasquale, 2018. "Gini estimation under infinite variance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 256-269.
    2. Zhang, Quanda & Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa, 2020. "Income inequality and subjective wellbeing: Panel data evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Zhang, Haifeng & Zhang, Hongliang & Zhang, Junsen, 2015. "Demographic age structure and economic development: Evidence from Chinese provinces," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 170-185.
    4. Davidson, Russell, 2009. "Reliable inference for the Gini index," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 30-40, May.
    5. Maria Grazia Pittau & Roberto Zelli, 2004. "Testing for changing shapes of income distribution: Italian evidence in the 1990s from kernel density estimates," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 415-430, May.
    6. Tomson Ogwang, 2000. "A Convenient Method of Computing the Gini Index and its Standard Error," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 62(1), pages 123-129, February.
    7. Guanghua Wan & Zhangyue Zhou, 2005. "Income Inequality in Rural China: Regression‐based Decomposition Using Household Data," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 107-120, February.
    8. Molero-Simarro, Ricardo, 2017. "Inequality in China revisited. The effect of functional distribution of income on urban top incomes, the urban-rural gap and the Gini index, 1978–2015," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 101-117.
    9. Sergio Firpo & Nicole M. Fortin & Thomas Lemieux, 2009. "Unconditional Quantile Regressions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 953-973, May.
    10. Wang, ZuXiang & Smyth, Russell, 2015. "A hybrid method for creating Lorenz curves," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 59-63.
    11. Li, Qinghai & Li, Shi & Wan, Haiyuan, 2020. "Top incomes in China: Data collection and the impact on income inequality," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    12. Juan Yang & Man Gao, 2018. "The impact of education expansion on wage inequality," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(12), pages 1309-1323, March.
    13. Bhattacharya, Debopam, 2007. "Inference on inequality from household survey data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 674-707, April.
    14. John C. H. Fei & Gustav Ranis & Shirley W. Y. Kuo, 1978. "Growth and the Family Distribution of Income by Factor Components," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 92(1), pages 17-53.
    15. Maury Gittleman & Edward N. Wolff, 1993. "International Comparisons Of Inter‐Industry Wage Differentials," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 39(3), pages 295-312, September.
    16. Sergio P. Firpo & Nicole M. Fortin & Thomas Lemieux, 2018. "Decomposing Wage Distributions Using Recentered Influence Function Regressions," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-40, May.
    17. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
    18. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Zhang, Hai-Lun & Zheng, Hong-Hao, 2019. "Estimation of Lorenz curves based on dummy variable regression," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 69-75.
    19. Han, Xuehui & Cheng, Yuan, 2019. "Does the "missing" high-income matter? -Income distribution and inequality revisited with truncated distribution," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Rothe, Christoph, 2010. "Nonparametric estimation of distributional policy effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 56-70, March.
    21. Li, Chengyou & Yu, Yangcheng & Li, Qinghai, 2021. "Top-income data and income inequality correction in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 210-219.
    22. Knight, John & Gunatilaka, Ramani, 2022. "Income inequality and happiness: Which inequalities matter in China?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mengfan Li & Wanzhen Wen & Wenwu Ma & Yihang Jin, 2025. "Research on the Common Prosperity Effect of Integrated Regional Expansion: An Empirical Study Based on the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Zhu, Chen & Wang, Zekai & Jiang, Qi & Xie, Chang, 2024. "Does industry monopolization widen wage residual inequality In China?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mao, Minghai & Raiola, Antonio & Yang, Da, 2025. "Double machine learning for Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Francesco Andreoli & Eugenio Peluso, 2016. "So close yet so unequal: Reconsidering spatial inequality in U.S. cities," Working Papers 21/2016, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    3. Cécile Couharde & Rémi Generoso, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of National Air Quality Standards on Agricultural Land Values: Insights from Corn and Soybean Regions," Working Papers hal-04503777, HAL.
    4. Xiaofeng Lv & Gupeng Zhang & Guangyu Ren, 2017. "Gini index estimation for lifetime data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 275-304, April.
    5. Lynn Karoly & Carsten Schröder, 2015. "Fast methods for jackknifing inequality indices," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 37(1), pages 125-138.
    6. Andlib, Zubaria, 2025. "Breaking Barriers or Reinforcing Gaps? Gender Wage Disparities Across Skill Levels in a Developing Economy," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1555 [rev.], Global Labor Organization (GLO), revised 2025.
    7. Javier Olivera, 2023. "Ageing Unequally in Latin America," LISER Working Paper Series 2023-07, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    8. Carlos Gradín & Gabriela Zapata-Román, 2024. "Unpacking inequality of opportunity in Chile: the role of birth circumstances using a Shapley decomposition," Working Papers 676, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    9. Frank A. Cowell & Emmanuel Flachaire, 2014. "Statistical Methods for Distributional Analysis," Working Papers halshs-01115996, HAL.
    10. Ekaterina Selezneva & Philippe Van Kerm, 2016. "A distribution-sensitive examination of the gender wage gap in Germany," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 14(1), pages 21-40, March.
    11. Franziska Brall & Ramona Schmid, 2023. "Automation, robots and wage inequality in Germany: A decomposition analysis," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 37(1), pages 33-95, March.
    12. Raya Das & Ravi Srivastava, 2021. "Income inequality among agricultural households in India: A regression‐based decomposition analysis," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 1128-1149, August.
    13. Rothe, Christoph, 2010. "Nonparametric estimation of distributional policy effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 56-70, March.
    14. Jean-Marie Dufour & Emmanuel Flachaire & Lynda Khalaf, 2019. "Permutation Tests for Comparing Inequality Measures," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 457-470, July.
    15. Zhang, Chen & Yu, Yangcheng & Li, Qinghai, 2023. "Top incomes and income polarisation in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. ANDREOLI Francesco & PELUSO Eugenio, 2017. "So close yet so unequal: Spatial inequality in American cities," LISER Working Paper Series 2017-11, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    17. Judith A. Clarke & Ahmed A. Hoque, 2014. "On Variance Estimation for a Gini Coefficient Estimator Obtained from Complex Survey Data," Econometrics Working Papers 1401, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    18. Ogwang Tomson, 2014. "A Convenient Method of Decomposing the Gini Index by Population Subgroups," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 91-105, March.
    19. Thor O. Thoresen & Zhiyang Jia & Peter J. Lambert, 2013. "Distributional benchmarking in tax policy evaluations," Discussion Papers 765, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    20. Wang, Dongliang & Zhao, Yichuan & Gilmore, Dirk W., 2016. "Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence interval for the Gini index," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 289-295.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • D30 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - General
    • R20 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:81:y:2023:i:c:s1043951x23001244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.