IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v384y2025ics0306261925001734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Battery electric long-haul trucking with overnight charging in the United States: A comprehensive costing and emissions analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Moreno Sader, Kariana
  • Biswas, Sayandeep
  • Jones, Rob
  • Mennig, Marian
  • Rezaei, Reza
  • Green, William H.

Abstract

This work presents a costing and emissions analysis of long-haul battery electric trucks (BETs) with overnight charging for the U.S. market. The energy requirements of a long-haul truck for a 600-mile (966 km) real-world driving range determine battery sizes. The battery masses are used along with a fleet-replacement model and the U.S. payload distribution to compute payload losses for two different chemistries, Nickel-Manganese-Cobalt (NMC) and Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LFP). With present battery energy densities, BET fleets require 6% (NMC) or 27% (LFP) more trucks to move the same cargo as today’s diesel fleet. The cost of electricity delivered using high-power overnight chargers is analyzed. Our baseline scenario estimates 0.32 USD/kWh, and it only decreases to 0.15 USD/kWh for the optimistic scenario. Currently, we compute the total cost of ownership for BETs to be more than twice (>2x) that of diesel trucks, however, the price premium is projected to decrease significantly to 1.2x in the long term. BETs could become economically competitive with diesel if the delivered cost of electricity drops below 0.1 USD/kWh, and if we realize projected improvements in battery energy density and cost. Our emissions analysis shows negligible greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits from switching to BETs today, primarily due to the carbon intensity of electricity generation. In the long term, we project BETs to have 40% less GHG emissions than diesel. Today, BETs are not well-suited for the long-haul trucking sector. However, short-haul trucking could potentially benefit from electrification, and battery-swapping could significantly benefit long-haul BET, hence we encourage further investigation. Our analysis framework is provided as a Google Colab Notebook that can be modified to assist these needed future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Moreno Sader, Kariana & Biswas, Sayandeep & Jones, Rob & Mennig, Marian & Rezaei, Reza & Green, William H., 2025. "Battery electric long-haul trucking with overnight charging in the United States: A comprehensive costing and emissions analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:384:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925001734
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925001734
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt7s25d8bc is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Muratori, Matteo & Kontou, Eleftheria & Eichman, Joshua, 2019. "Electricity rates for electric vehicle direct current fast charging in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Natalie D. Popovich & Deepak Rajagopal & Elif Tasar & Amol Phadke, 2021. "Economic, environmental and grid-resilience benefits of converting diesel trains to battery-electric," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1017-1025, November.
    4. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt2qz0n2gv is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Shashank Sripad & Venkatasubramanian Viswanathan, 2018. "Quantifying the Economic Case for Electric Semi-Trucks," Papers 1804.05974, arXiv.org.
    6. Kebede, Abraham Alem & Kalogiannis, Theodoros & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Berecibar, Maitane, 2022. "A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt5vb9d26f is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Forrest, Kate & Mac Kinnon, Michael & Tarroja, Brian & Samuelsen, Scott, 2020. "Estimating the technical feasibility of fuel cell and battery electric vehicles for the medium and heavy duty sectors in California," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    9. Jürgen Janek & Wolfgang G. Zeier, 2023. "Challenges in speeding up solid-state battery development," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 230-240, March.
    10. Xiao-Guang Yang & Teng Liu & Chao-Yang Wang, 2021. "Thermally modulated lithium iron phosphate batteries for mass-market electric vehicles," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 176-185, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt5zx1k22k is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mehmet C. Yagci & Thomas Feldmann & Elmar Bollin & Michael Schmidt & Wolfgang G. Bessler, 2022. "Aging Characteristics of Stationary Lithium-Ion Battery Systems with Serial and Parallel Cell Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Yuqiang Zeng & Buyi Zhang & Yanbao Fu & Fengyu Shen & Qiye Zheng & Divya Chalise & Ruijiao Miao & Sumanjeet Kaur & Sean D. Lubner & Michael C. Tucker & Vincent Battaglia & Chris Dames & Ravi S. Prashe, 2023. "Extreme fast charging of commercial Li-ion batteries via combined thermal switching and self-heating approaches," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Duggal, Angel Swastik & Singh, Rajesh & Gehlot, Anita & Gupta, Lovi Raj & Akram, Sheik Vaseem & Prakash, Chander & Singh, Sunpreet & Kumar, Raman, 2021. "Infrastructure, mobility and safety 4.0: Modernization in road transportation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    6. Schulz, Arne & Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk, 2024. "Centrally-chosen versus user-selected swaps: How the selection of swapping stations impacts standby battery inventories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 726-738.
    7. Togun, Hussein & Basem, Ali & Abdulrazzaq, Tuqa & Biswas, Nirmalendu & Abed, Azher M. & dhabab, Jameel M. & Chattopadhyay, Anirban & Slimi, Khalifa & Paul, Dipankar & Barmavatu, Praveen & Chrouda, Ama, 2025. "Development and comparative analysis between battery electric vehicles (BEV) and fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    8. Efstathios E. Michaelides, 2025. "Energy Efficiency and the Transition to Renewables—Building Communities of the Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Qi Zhang & Yunlong Shang & Yan Li & Rui Zhu, 2025. "A Concise Review of Power Batteries and Battery Management Systems for Electric and Hybrid Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Li, Zehong & Wang, Chunying & Chen, Jian, 2024. "Supply and demand of lithium in China based on dynamic material flow analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Zahari, Teuku Naraski & McLellan, Benjamin Craig, 2024. "Sustainability of Indonesia's transportation sector energy and resources demand under the low carbon transition strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    12. Yiwei You & Dexin Zhang & Zhifeng Wu & Tie-Yu Lü & Xinrui Cao & Yang Sun & Zi-Zhong Zhu & Shunqing Wu, 2025. "Grain boundary amorphization as a strategy to mitigate lithium dendrite growth in solid-state batteries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Pin-Han Chen & Cheng-Han Lee & Jun-Yi Wu & Wei-Sheng Chen, 2023. "Perspectives on Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, March.
    14. Tatiana Potapenko & Jessica S. Döhler & Francisco Francisco & George Lavidas & Irina Temiz, 2023. "Renewable Energy Potential for Micro-Grid at Hvide Sande," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Yavari, Mohammad & Bohreghi, Iman Mohammadi, 2025. "Developing a green-resilient power network and supply chain: Integrating renewable and traditional energy sources in the face of disruptions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    16. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2023. "The Use of Hydrogen for Traction in Freight Transport: Estimating the Reduction in Fuel Consumption and Emissions in a Regional Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    17. Matthew Burton & Sudarshan Narayanan & Ben Jagger & Lorenz F. Olbrich & Shobhan Dhir & Masafumi Shibata & Michael J. Lain & Robert Astbury & Nicholas Butcher & Mark Copley & Toshikazu Kotaka & Yuichi , 2025. "Techno-economic assessment of thin lithium metal anodes for solid-state batteries," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 135-147, January.
    18. Reveles-Miranda, María & Ramirez-Rivera, Victor & Pacheco-Catalán, Daniella, 2024. "Hybrid energy storage: Features, applications, and ancillary benefits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    19. Li, Yuming & Wang, Tingyu & Li, Xinxi & Zhang, Guoqing & Chen, Kai & Yang, Wensheng, 2022. "Experimental investigation on thermal management system with flame retardant flexible phase change material for retired battery module," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    20. Qiao, Long & Pu, Wenhao & Wu, Bingwei & Liu, Ruihang & Song, Nanxin, 2024. "Performance study of a supercritical carbon dioxide energy storage system with non-uniform graded compression heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    21. Phillip K. Agbesi & Rico Ruffino & Marko Hakovirta, 2024. "Creating an optimal electric vehicle ecosystem: an investigation of electric vehicle stakeholders and ecosystem trends in the US," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-36, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:384:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925001734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.