IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v378y2025ipas0306261924021093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two sides of a coin: Assessing trade-offs between reliability and profit in mini grids and the policy implications for subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Maqelepo, Lefu
  • Wamalwa, Fhazhil
  • Williams, Nathan
  • Taneja, Jay

Abstract

Universal access to electricity is an important milestone featured in countries development plans. It is well understood within the energy practitioner and research communities that to reach this milestone, distributed energy resources, especially mini grids, are to play a crucial role as they represent a least cost alternative to reach most rural communities. The success of mini grids though is highly reliant on favorable policies, particularly regulations pertaining to tariffs (i.e., electricity rates). In this research, we use Tanzania as a case study to investigate the likely consequences of grid and mini grid tariff equalization regulation which ignores the fact that the tariff charged on the grid is highly subsidized compared to mini grid tariffs that must be cost reflective for mini grid utilities to be financially sustainable. We recognize that a private mini grid operator has an obligation to make profits for the investors. Because of this, they have two critical yet divergent operating points from which to choose: (1) serving 100% of the demand at all times, potentially incurring operating losses during some periods and (2) partially serving the demand to maximize returns, potentially compromising customer satisfaction. Using an empirically-informed model of a mini grid sized to minimize net present cost that supplies power to 500 customers, we quantify the cost of reliability between these two key operating points and trace the curve relating profit and reliability, for two types of load scenarios: fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads. We found that profit is optimized at a reliability of 92.3% and 86.0% for systems that meet fixed loads and fixed plus flexible loads respectively. This reduced reliability can have crucial implications on the viability of mini grids for providing electricity access, as customer dissatisfaction and profits may erode. We show that under the policy of tariff equalization between the centralized grid and mini grids, the latter is challenged to survive and therefore the communities which are being served through mini grids may experience de-electrification, which would represent a huge regression with regards to meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) of universal electricity access.

Suggested Citation

  • Maqelepo, Lefu & Wamalwa, Fhazhil & Williams, Nathan & Taneja, Jay, 2025. "Two sides of a coin: Assessing trade-offs between reliability and profit in mini grids and the policy implications for subsidies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:378:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261924021093
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021093
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levin, Todd & Thomas, Valerie M., 2012. "Least-cost network evaluation of centralized and decentralized contributions to global electrification," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 286-302.
    2. Ikejemba, Eugene C.X. & Mpuan, Peter B. & Schuur, Peter C. & Van Hillegersberg, Jos, 2017. "The empirical reality & sustainable management failures of renewable energy projects in Sub-Saharan Africa (part 1 of 2)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 234-240.
    3. Orosz, Matthew & Altes-Buch, Queralt & Mueller, Amy & Lemort, Vincent, 2018. "Experimental validation of an electrical and thermal energy demand model for rapid assessment of rural health centers in sub-Saharan Africa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 382-390.
    4. Duran, Asligul Serasu & Sahinyazan, Feyza G., 2021. "An analysis of renewable mini-grid projects for rural electrification," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. E. Zigah & M. Barry & Anna Creti, 2023. "Are Mini-Grid Projects in Tanzania Financially Sustainable?," Post-Print hal-04439989, HAL.
    6. Lee, Mitchell & Soto, Daniel & Modi, Vijay, 2014. "Cost versus reliability sizing strategy for isolated photovoltaic micro-grids in the developing world," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 16-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugene C.X. Ikejemba & Peter C. Schuur, 2018. "Analyzing the Impact of Theft and Vandalism in Relation to the Sustainability of Renewable Energy Development Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Bustos, Cristian & Watts, David, 2017. "Novel methodology for microgrids in isolated communities: Electricity cost-coverage trade-off with 3-stage technology mix, dispatch & configuration optimizations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 204-221.
    3. Zapata, Oscar, 2022. "Renewable Energy and Community Development," OSF Preprints tk59y, Center for Open Science.
    4. Nieves, J.A. & Aristizábal, A.J. & Dyner, I. & Báez, O. & Ospina, D.H., 2019. "Energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions analysis in Colombia: A LEAP model application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 380-397.
    5. Abdul Munim Rehmani & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Abdullah Altamimi & Zafar A. Khan & Muhammad Awais, 2023. "Techno-Economic-Environmental Assessment of an Isolated Rural Micro-Grid from a Mid-Career Repowering Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-35, January.
    6. Jean-Claude Berthélemy & Arnaud Millien, 2018. "Impact of Decentralized Electrification Projects on Sustainable Development: A Meta-Analysis," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01922517, HAL.
    7. Tamer Khatib & Dhiaa Halboot Muhsen, 2020. "Optimal Sizing of Standalone Photovoltaic System Using Improved Performance Model and Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Giaouris, Damian & Papadopoulos, Athanasios I. & Patsios, Charalampos & Walker, Sara & Ziogou, Chrysovalantou & Taylor, Phil & Voutetakis, Spyros & Papadopoulou, Simira & Seferlis, Panos, 2018. "A systems approach for management of microgrids considering multiple energy carriers, stochastic loads, forecasting and demand side response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 546-559.
    9. Riva, Fabio & Gardumi, Francesco & Tognollo, Annalisa & Colombo, Emanuela, 2019. "Soft-linking energy demand and optimisation models for local long-term electricity planning: An application to rural India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 32-46.
    10. Sarhan, Ameen & Hizam, Hashim & Mariun, Norman & Ya'acob, M.E., 2019. "An improved numerical optimization algorithm for sizing and configuration of standalone photo-voltaic system components in Yemen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1434-1446.
    11. Shyu, Chian-Woei, 2012. "Rural electrification program with renewable energy sources: An analysis of China’s Township Electrification Program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 842-853.
    12. Hoffmann, Martha M. & Ansari, Dawud, 2019. "Simulating the potential of swarm grids for pre-electrified communities – A case study from Yemen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 108, pages 289-302.
    13. Nock, Destenie & Levin, Todd & Baker, Erin, 2020. "Changing the policy paradigm: A benefit maximization approach to electricity planning in developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    14. Marco De Nigris & Francesca Giuliano, 2023. "The Role of Organised Civil Society in the Implementation of the Renewable Energy Transition and Renewable Energy Communities: A Qualitative Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, May.
    15. Kursun, Berrin & Bakshi, Bhavik R. & Mahata, Manoj & Martin, Jay F., 2015. "Life cycle and emergy based design of energy systems in developing countries: Centralized and localized options," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 305(C), pages 40-53.
    16. Philip Sandwell & Clementine Chambon & Amit Saraogi & Apolline Chabenat & Marek Mazur & Ned Ekins-Daukes & Jenny Nelson, 2016. "Analysis of energy access and impact of modern energy sources in unelectrified villages in Uttar Pradesh," Post-Print hal-02376406, HAL.
    17. Mehigan, L. & Deane, J.P. & Gallachóir, B.P.Ó. & Bertsch, V., 2018. "A review of the role of distributed generation (DG) in future electricity systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 822-836.
    18. McPherson, Madeleine & Ismail, Malik & Hoornweg, Daniel & Metcalfe, Murray, 2018. "Planning for variable renewable energy and electric vehicle integration under varying degrees of decentralization: A case study in Lusaka, Zambia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 332-346.
    19. Duran, Asligul Serasu & Sahinyazan, Feyza G., 2021. "An analysis of renewable mini-grid projects for rural electrification," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Friebe, Christian A. & Flotow, Paschen von & Täube, Florian A., 2013. "Exploring the link between products and services in low-income markets—Evidence from solar home systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 760-769.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:378:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261924021093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.