IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v261y2020ics0306261919320379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS

Author

Listed:
  • AlNouss, Ahmed
  • Parthasarathy, Prakash
  • Shahbaz, Muhammad
  • Al-Ansari, Tareq
  • Mackey, Hamish
  • McKay, Gordon

Abstract

The study on the steam gasification of biomass char is important to evaluate the performance of steam gasification of biomass and its char. A validated ASPEN plus model was used to investigate the effects of temperature (1023, 1073, 1123, 1173, and 1223 K) and steam-to-feed ratio (0.5, 1.0. 1.5. 2.0, and 2.5) on the syngas output and its composition using steam gasification of coir pith and its char. The study also compared the output and composition of syngas of both processes conducted at 1123 K and 0.75 (steam-to-feed ratio). The techno-economic analysis of both gasifications at the above condition was also investigated. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the temperature has both positive and negative influences; while increasing the steam-to-feed ratio has only a positive influence on the syngas output. Further, it was observed that the increase in temperature increased the yield of H2 and CO, but it decreased the yield of CO2 and CH4. Meanwhile, it was noted that the increase in steam-to-feed ratio increased the yield of H2 and CO2 however, it decreased the yield of CO and CH4. The comparative study indicated that the coir pith char gasification generated 27% more syngas output and 25% more H2 + CO composition than the coir pith gasification. The techno-economic analysis indicated that the coir pith char steam gasification can generate 1.12 times more revenue than coir pith steam gasification. It can be concluded that the biomass char gasification is more advantageous than biomass only gasification.

Suggested Citation

  • AlNouss, Ahmed & Parthasarathy, Prakash & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:261:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919320379
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919320379
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miguel-Angel Perea-Moreno & Esther Samerón-Manzano & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2019. "Biomass as Renewable Energy: Worldwide Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Zhou, Chunguang & Rosén, Christer & Engvall, Klas, 2016. "Biomass oxygen/steam gasification in a pressurized bubbling fluidized bed: Agglomeration behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 230-250.
    3. Zhang, Ziyin & Pang, Shusheng, 2019. "Experimental investigation of tar formation and producer gas composition in biomass steam gasification in a 100 kW dual fluidised bed gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 416-424.
    4. Shen, Ye & Li, Xian & Yao, Zhiyi & Cui, Xiaoqiang & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2019. "CO2 gasification of woody biomass: Experimental study from a lab-scale reactor to a small-scale autothermal gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 497-506.
    5. Bouraoui, Zeineb & Jeguirim, Mejdi & Guizani, Chamseddine & Limousy, Lionel & Dupont, Capucine & Gadiou, Roger, 2015. "Thermogravimetric study on the influence of structural, textural and chemical properties of biomass chars on CO2 gasification reactivity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 703-710.
    6. Yao, Zhiyi & You, Siming & Ge, Tianshu & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2018. "Biomass gasification for syngas and biochar co-production: Energy application and economic evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 43-55.
    7. Gröbl, Thomas & Walter, Heimo & Haider, Markus, 2012. "Biomass steam gasification for production of SNG – Process design and sensitivity analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 451-461.
    8. Bai, Zhang & Liu, Qibin & Gong, Liang & Lei, Jing, 2019. "Investigation of a solar-biomass gasification system with the production of methanol and electricity: Thermodynamic, economic and off-design operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 91-101.
    9. Saxena, R.C. & Seal, Diptendu & Kumar, Satinder & Goyal, H.B., 2008. "Thermo-chemical routes for hydrogen rich gas from biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(7), pages 1909-1927, September.
    10. Ngo, Son Ich & Nguyen, Thanh D.B. & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Byung-Ho & Lee, Uen-Do & Choi, Young-Tai & Song, Jae-Hun, 2011. "Performance evaluation for dual circulating fluidized-bed steam gasifier of biomass using quasi-equilibrium three-stage gasification model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 5208-5220.
    11. Nipattummakul, Nimit & Ahmed, Islam & Kerdsuwan, Somrat & Gupta, Ashwani K., 2010. "High temperature steam gasification of wastewater sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 3729-3734, December.
    12. Benedetti, Vittoria & Patuzzi, Francesco & Baratieri, Marco, 2018. "Characterization of char from biomass gasification and its similarities with activated carbon in adsorption applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 92-99.
    13. Kaushal, Priyanka & Tyagi, Rakesh, 2017. "Advanced simulation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 629-636.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Feng & Zhang, Yuhao & Zhao, Liang & Gao, Jinsen & Hao, Pengfei & Meng, Qingfei & Xu, Chunming, 2022. "Research on thermodynamic and simulation method of extractive distillation for desulfurization of FCC naphtha," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    2. Lo, Shirleen Lee Yuen & How, Bing Shen & Teng, Sin Yong & Lam, Hon Loong & Lim, Chun Hsion & Rhamdhani, Muhammad Akbar & Sunarso, Jaka, 2021. "Stochastic techno-economic evaluation model for biomass supply chain: A biomass gasification case study with supply chain uncertainties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Costa, Juliana E.B. & Barbosa, Andrey S. & Melo, Marcus A.F. & Melo, Dulce M.A. & Medeiros, Rodolfo L.B.A. & Braga, Renata M., 2022. "Renewable aromatics through catalytic pyrolysis of coconut fiber (Cocos nucífera Linn.) using low cost HZSM-5," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 439-446.
    4. Fang, Yi & Paul, Manosh C. & Varjani, Sunita & Li, Xian & Park, Young-Kwon & You, Siming, 2021. "Concentrated solar thermochemical gasification of biomass: Principles, applications, and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Hameed, Zeeshan & Aslam, Muhammad & Khan, Zakir & Maqsood, Khuram & Atabani, A.E. & Ghauri, Moinuddin & Khurram, Muhammad Shahzad & Rehan, Mohammad & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar, 2021. "Gasification of municipal solid waste blends with biomass for energy production and resources recovery: Current status, hybrid technologies and innovative prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Qiu, Jianhua & Wu, Fujun & Chen, Fangzhou & Huang, Weijia & Cai, Yezheng & Jiang, Juantao, 2022. "Entire process simulation and thermodynamic analysis of the catalytic gasification for synthetic natural gas from biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Minda Loweski Feliz & Lokmane Abdelouahed & Bechara Taouk, 2024. "Comparative and Descriptive Study of Biomass Gasification Simulations Using Aspen Plus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Liu, Li & Jiang, Peng & Qian, Hongliang & Mu, Liwen & Lu, Xiaohua & Zhu, Jiahua, 2022. "CO2-negative biomass conversion: An economic route with co-production of green hydrogen and highly porous carbon," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    9. Wang, Jiangjiang & Cui, Zhiheng & Yao, Wenqi & Huo, Shuojie, 2023. "Regulation strategies and thermodynamic analysis of combined cooling, heating, and power system integrated with biomass gasification and solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    10. Claudia Patricia Pérez-Rodríguez & Luis Alberto Ríos & Carmen Sofía Duarte González & Andres Montaña & Catalina García-Marroquín, 2022. "Harnessing Residual Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source in Colombia: A Potential Gasification Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Wang, Chi-Hwa & Ok, Yong Sik & You, Siming & Wang, Xiaonan, 2020. "The research and development of waste-to-hydrogen technologies and systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Kargbo, Hannah O. & Zhang, Jie & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "Optimisation of two-stage biomass gasification for hydrogen production via artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    13. Shen, Xiaobo & Zhang, Zhenwu & Dou, Zengguo & Cong, Beihua & Xiao, Qiuping & Liu, Haifeng, 2022. "Premixed syngas/air combustion in closed ducts with varied aspect ratios and initial pressures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuo, Yen-Ting & Almansa, G. Aranda & Vreugdenhil, B.J., 2018. "Catalytic aromatization of ethylene in syngas from biomass to enhance economic sustainability of gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 21-30.
    2. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos, 2019. "Modelling of advanced gasification systems (MAGSY): Simulation and validation for the case of the rising co-current reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 526-533.
    3. Gai, Chao & Chen, Mengjun & Liu, Tingting & Peng, Nana & Liu, Zhengang, 2016. "Gasification characteristics of hydrochar and pyrochar derived from sewage sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 957-965.
    4. Chaiwatanodom, Paphonwit & Vivanpatarakij, Supawat & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification with CO2 recycle for synthesis gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 10-17.
    5. Xiang, Yanlei & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Cheng, Zeyang & Liu, Zexi, 2020. "Study on the effect of gasification agents on the integrated system of biomass gasification combined cycle and oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Yang, Xiaoxia & Tian, Sicong & Kan, Tao & Zhu, Yuxiang & Xu, Honghui & Strezov, Vladimir & Nelson, Peter & Jiang, Yijiao, 2019. "Sorption-enhanced thermochemical conversion of sewage sludge to syngas with intensified carbon utilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    7. Chen, Tianju & Zhang, Juan & Wang, Zhiqi & Zhao, Ruidong & He, Jianjiang & Wu, Jinhu & Qin, Jianguang, 2020. "Oxygen-enriched gasification of lignocellulosic biomass: Syngas analysis, physicochemical characteristics of the carbon-rich material and its utilization as an anode in lithium ion battery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    9. Gupta, Saurabh & Choudhary, Shikhar & Kumar, Suraj & De, Santanu, 2021. "Large eddy simulation of biomass gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed based on the multiphase particle-in-cell method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1455-1466.
    10. Jhulimar Castro & Jonathan Leaver & Shusheng Pang, 2022. "Simulation and Techno-Economic Assessment of Hydrogen Production from Biomass Gasification-Based Processes: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-37, November.
    11. Setyawan, M. Ismail Bagus & Dafiqurrohman, Hafif & Akbar, Maha Hidayatullah & Surjosatyo, Adi, 2021. "Characterizing a two-stage downdraft biomass gasifier using a representative particle model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 750-767.
    12. Parthasarathy, Prakash & Narayanan, K. Sheeba, 2014. "Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: Influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield – A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 570-579.
    13. Kong, Ge & Zhang, Xin & Wang, Kejie & Zhou, Linling & Wang, Jin & Zhang, Xuesong & Han, Lujia, 2023. "Tunable H2/CO syngas production from co-gasification integrated with steam reforming of sewage sludge and agricultural biomass: A experimental study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    14. Fang, Yi & Paul, Manosh C. & Varjani, Sunita & Li, Xian & Park, Young-Kwon & You, Siming, 2021. "Concentrated solar thermochemical gasification of biomass: Principles, applications, and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. Prasad, Lalta & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Subrahmanyam, J.P., 2015. "Experimental investigation on gasification characteristic of high lignin biomass (Pongamia shells)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 415-423.
    16. AlNouss, Ahmed & McKay, Gordon & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2020. "Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    17. Ratikorn Sornumpol & Dang Saebea & Amornchai Arpornwichanop & Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot, 2023. "Process Optimization and CO 2 Emission Analysis of Coal/Biomass Gasification Integrated with a Chemical Looping Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Li, Shenghui & Sun, Xiaojing & Liu, Linlin & Du, Jian, 2023. "A full process optimization of methanol production integrated with co-generation based on the co-gasification of biomass and coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    19. Miguel-Angel Perea-Moreno & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Fernando Rueda-Martinez & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2020. "Zapote Seed ( Pouteria mammosa L. ) Valorization for Thermal Energy Generation in Tropical Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:261:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919320379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.