IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12537-d931442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harnessing Residual Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source in Colombia: A Potential Gasification Scenario

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Patricia Pérez-Rodríguez

    (Grupo Poscosecha de Productos Agrícolas, Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

  • Luis Alberto Ríos

    (Grupo Procesos Químicos Industriales, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín 050010, Colombia)

  • Carmen Sofía Duarte González

    (Grupo Poscosecha de Productos Agrícolas, Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

  • Andres Montaña

    (Grupo Poscosecha de Productos Agrícolas, Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

  • Catalina García-Marroquín

    (Grupo Poscosecha de Productos Agrícolas, Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

Abstract

Currently, developing new or more efficient ways of producing bioenergy has caused governments from around the world to formulate compromises. These compromises translate, on a national scale, into government policies and strategies that aim to decarbonize the energy matrix of each country. The first step for efficient development is the quantification and energy-potential characterization of the available biomass. Using this framework, this study establishes the energy potential of the residual biomass produced by agricultural, agro-industrial, and forestry processes in Colombia, with gasification being the selected transformation technology. For this purpose, data from primary and secondary sources were analyzed. Next, some biomasses were prioritized according to their availability and physicochemical properties. Then, the theoretical energy potential of the total biomass produced in these productive sectors was estimated by using its physicochemical properties. The technical biomass–energy potential of the country (204.8–235.3 PJ) was estimated by considering the current level of unused biomass and evaluating the logistics and conditioning requirements of the gasification process, while accounting for the peaks and off-peaks of production in the country. Thus, if all the biomasses were processed in a gasification plant (22.2–24.0% efficiency), as proposed in this study, then the installed capacity—if the plant-use factor was 85%—would range between 1696.7–2111.3 MW. The results of the present research were validated by representatives of unions, companies, and government entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Patricia Pérez-Rodríguez & Luis Alberto Ríos & Carmen Sofía Duarte González & Andres Montaña & Catalina García-Marroquín, 2022. "Harnessing Residual Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source in Colombia: A Potential Gasification Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12537-:d:931442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12537/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12537/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albashabsheh, Nibal T. & Heier Stamm, Jessica L., 2019. "Optimization of lignocellulosic biomass-to-biofuel supply chains with mobile pelleting," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 545-562.
    2. AlNouss, Ahmed & Parthasarathy, Prakash & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    3. Gonzalez-Salazar, Miguel Angel & Morini, Mirko & Pinelli, Michele & Spina, Pier Ruggero & Venturini, Mauro & Finkenrath, Matthias & Poganietz, Witold-Roger, 2014. "Methodology for estimating biomass energy potential and its application to Colombia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 781-796.
    4. Toklu, E., 2017. "Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 235-244.
    5. Ferreira, L.R.A. & Otto, R.B. & Silva, F.P. & De Souza, S.N.M. & De Souza, S.S. & Ando Junior, O.H., 2018. "Review of the energy potential of the residual biomass for the distributed generation in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 440-455.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibrahim Mosly & Anas A. Makki, 2018. "Current Status and Willingness to Adopt Renewable Energy Technologies in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    3. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    4. Silva, D.A.L. & Filleti, R.A.P. & Musule, R. & Matheus, T.T. & Freire, F., 2022. "A systematic review and life cycle assessment of biomass pellets and briquettes production in Latin America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Chepeliev, Maksym & Diachuk, Oleksandr & Podolets, Roman & Trypolska, Galyna, 2021. "The role of bioenergy in Ukraine's climate mitigation policy by 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Gupta, Shubhi & Gupta, Goutam Kishore & Mondal, Monoj Kumar, 2019. "Slow pyrolysis of chemically treated walnut shell for valuable products: Effect of process parameters and in-depth product analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 665-676.
    7. Arcigni, Francesco & Friso, Riccardo & Collu, Maurizio & Venturini, Mauro, 2019. "Harmonized and systematic assessment of microalgae energy potential for biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 614-624.
    8. Liu, Li & Jiang, Peng & Qian, Hongliang & Mu, Liwen & Lu, Xiaohua & Zhu, Jiahua, 2022. "CO2-negative biomass conversion: An economic route with co-production of green hydrogen and highly porous carbon," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    9. Jung, Sungyup & Lee, Jechan & Moon, Deok Hyun & Kim, Ki-Hyun & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2021. "Upgrading biogas into syngas through dry reforming," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    10. Shen, Xiaobo & Zhang, Zhenwu & Dou, Zengguo & Cong, Beihua & Xiao, Qiuping & Liu, Haifeng, 2022. "Premixed syngas/air combustion in closed ducts with varied aspect ratios and initial pressures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    11. Durval Maluf Filho & Suani Teixeira Coelho & Danilo Perecin, 2022. "Opportunities and Challenges of Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, April.
    12. Alba Mondragón-Valero & Borja Velázquez-Martí & Domingo M. Salazar & Isabel López-Cortés, 2018. "Influence of Fertilization and Rootstocks in the Biomass Energy Characterization of Prunus dulcis (Miller)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Wajahat Ullah Khan Tareen & Zuha Anjum & Nabila Yasin & Leenah Siddiqui & Ifzana Farhat & Suheel Abdullah Malik & Saad Mekhilef & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Ben Horan & Mohamed Darwish & Muhammad Aamir &, 2018. "The Prospective Non-Conventional Alternate and Renewable Energy Sources in Pakistan—A Focus on Biomass Energy for Power Generation, Transportation, and Industrial Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-49, September.
    14. Lunz, Benedikt & Stöcker, Philipp & Eckstein, Sascha & Nebel, Arjuna & Samadi, Sascha & Erlach, Berit & Fischedick, Manfred & Elsner, Peter & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2016. "Scenario-based comparative assessment of potential future electricity systems – A new methodological approach using Germany in 2050 as an example," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 555-580.
    15. Simioni, Taysnara & Agustini, Caroline Borges & Dettmer, Aline & Gutterres, Mariliz, 2022. "Enhancement of biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of leather waste with raw and pretreated wheat straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    16. Hollas, C.E. & Bolsan, A.C. & Chini, A. & Venturin, B. & Bonassa, G. & Cândido, D. & Antes, F.G. & Steinmetz, R.L.R. & Prado, N.V. & Kunz, A., 2021. "Effects of swine manure storage time on solid-liquid separation and biogas production: A life-cycle assessment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Noushabadi, Abolfazl Sajadi & Dashti, Amir & Ahmadijokani, Farhad & Hu, Jinguang & Mohammadi, Amir H., 2021. "Estimation of higher heating values (HHVs) of biomass fuels based on ultimate analysis using machine learning techniques and improved equation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 550-562.
    18. Sheng Zhong & Shuwen Niu & Yipeng Wang, 2018. "Research on Potential Evaluation and Sustainable Development of Rural Biomass Energy in Gansu Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Dennis Krüger & Özge Çepelioğullar Mutlu, 2021. "Demonstration of a Top-Lit Updraft Based Pyrolytic Burner with Low Emission Operation and Automatic Process Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Moiz, Abdul & Kawasaki, Akiyuki & Koike, Toshio & Shrestha, Maheswor, 2018. "A systematic decision support tool for robust hydropower site selection in poorly gauged basins," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 309-321.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12537-:d:931442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.