IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v249y2025ics0960148125007384.html

Hydrogen production prediction from Co-gasification of biomass and plastics using attention-gated MLP model

Author

Listed:
  • Ukwuoma, Chiagoziem C.
  • Cai, Dongsheng
  • Bamisile, Olusola
  • Bizi, Antonio M.
  • Amos, Toluwani Joan
  • Delali, Fiasam Linda
  • Thomas, Dara
  • Huang, Qi

Abstract

Research explores combining plastics and biowastes to decrease carbon footprints in the cement, iron, and steel industries. Co-gasification of these materials cuts carbon and converts it into hydrogen and syngas. The escalating demand for alternative energy sources has driven significant interest in hydrogen as a clean and efficient fuel. However, accurate prediction techniques are indispensable for ensuring the viability and sustainability of hydrogen production processes. While artificial intelligence models have shown promise in various fields, including computer vision and hydrogen prediction, they often encounter limitations such as low prediction accuracy with few data samples, lack of interpretability in yield result explanations, and susceptibility to adversarial attacks. Addressing these challenges is critical for advancing the reliability and applicability of hydrogen production prediction models. This study presents an attention-gated MLP model (agMLP). This novel end-to-end approach integrates MLP and attention mechanisms to enhance the accuracy and interpretability of hydrogen production prediction from the co-gasification of biomass and plastics. Furthermore, several explainable AI models were implemented to explain the proposed agMLP prediction for human understanding while using the Williams plot to indicate the applicability of the proposed agMLP. Further analysis was carried out using the Fast Gradient Sign Method and Projected Gradient Descent adversarial attack on the proposed agMLP model based on 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 perturbation to establish the associated risk of artificial intelligence model prediction via adversarial attack. Lastly, to compare the result of the agMLP model, nine (9) machine learning regression models and three ensemble models were developed and evaluated. The implemented model's performance was assessed using various evaluation metrics, including Mean Absolute, Mean Squared, Root Mean Squared, Root Mean Squared Logarithmic Error, and R2. The agMLP outperformed existing models' prediction accuracy while providing transparent and interpretable insights into the underlying factors influencing hydrogen production with an MAE of 0.061, MSE of 0.038, RMSE of 0.195, R2 of 0.997, MSLE of 0.000, and RMSLE of 0.005. Results from the explainable models show that independent variables with the highest relative relevance scores are: Percentage of plastics > HDPE particle size > RSS particle size > Temperature, while in comparison to size, temperatures between 500 °C and 900 °C have less of an effect on H2 generation. The agMLP model is subjected to FGSM and PGD adversarial attacks, resulting in significant performance degradation. The result of this study not only illustrates the potential of deep learning models in predicting hydrogen production and demonstrates the implications for optimizing hydrogen production processes, facilitating informed decision-making, and accelerating the transition towards sustainable energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ukwuoma, Chiagoziem C. & Cai, Dongsheng & Bamisile, Olusola & Bizi, Antonio M. & Amos, Toluwani Joan & Delali, Fiasam Linda & Thomas, Dara & Huang, Qi, 2025. "Hydrogen production prediction from Co-gasification of biomass and plastics using attention-gated MLP model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:249:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125007384
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.123076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125007384
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugenio Meloni & Giuseppina Iervolino & Concetta Ruocco & Simona Renda & Giovanni Festa & Marco Martino & Vincenzo Palma, 2022. "Electrified Hydrogen Production from Methane for PEM Fuel Cells Feeding: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-34, May.
    2. Yao, Zhiyi & You, Siming & Ge, Tianshu & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2018. "Biomass gasification for syngas and biochar co-production: Energy application and economic evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 43-55.
    3. Prins, Mark J. & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G., 2006. "More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3458-3470.
    4. Safarian, Sahar & Unnþórsson, Rúnar & Richter, Christiaan, 2019. "A review of biomass gasification modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 378-391.
    5. Lou, Siwei & Li, Danny H.W. & Lam, Joseph C. & Chan, Wilco W.H., 2016. "Prediction of diffuse solar irradiance using machine learning and multivariable regression," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 367-374.
    6. Chen, Hao & Zhang, Chao & Yu, Haizeng & Wang, Zhilin & Duncan, Ian & Zhou, Xianmin & Liu, Xiliang & Wang, Yu & Yang, Shenglai, 2022. "Application of machine learning to evaluating and remediating models for energy and environmental engineering," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    7. Hussain, Sajid & AlAlili, Ali, 2017. "A hybrid solar radiation modeling approach using wavelet multiresolution analysis and artificial neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 540-550.
    8. Devasahayam, Sheila & Albijanic, Boris, 2024. "Predicting hydrogen production from co-gasification of biomass and plastics using tree based machine learning algorithms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. Ma, Zherui & Wang, Jiangjiang & Feng, Yingsong & Wang, Ruikun & Zhao, Zhenghui & Chen, Hongwei, 2023. "Hydrogen yield prediction for supercritical water gasification based on generative adversarial network data augmentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    10. AlNouss, Ahmed & Parthasarathy, Prakash & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    11. Eugenio Meloni & Marco Martino & Giuseppina Iervolino & Concetta Ruocco & Simona Renda & Giovanni Festa & Vincenzo Palma, 2022. "The Route from Green H 2 Production through Bioethanol Reforming to CO 2 Catalytic Conversion: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-36, March.
    12. Fan, Yuyang & Tippayawong, Nakorn & Wei, Guoqiang & Huang, Zhen & Zhao, Kun & Jiang, Liqun & Zheng, Anqing & Zhao, Zengli & Li, Haibin, 2020. "Minimizing tar formation whilst enhancing syngas production by integrating biomass torrefaction pretreatment with chemical looping gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    13. Gassar, Abdo Abdullah Ahmed & Cha, Seung Hyun, 2021. "Review of geographic information systems-based rooftop solar photovoltaic potential estimation approaches at urban scales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    14. Wang, Zhangyuan & Zhao, Xudong & Han, Zhonghe & Luo, Liang & Xiang, Jinwei & Zheng, Senglin & Liu, Guangming & Yu, Min & Cui, Yu & Shittu, Samson & Hu, Menglong, 2021. "Advanced big-data/machine-learning techniques for optimization and performance enhancement of the heat pipe technology – A review and prospective study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    15. Jonah M. Williams & A. C. (Thanos) Bourtsalas, 2023. "Assessment of Co-Gasification Methods for Hydrogen Production from Biomass and Plastic Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ukwuoma, Chiagoziem C. & Cai, Dongsheng & Ukwuoma, Chibueze D. & Chukwuemeka, Mmesoma P. & Ayeni, Blessing O. & Ukwuoma, Chidera O. & Adeyi, Odeh Victor & Huang, Qi, 2025. "Sequential gated recurrent and self attention explainable deep learning model for predicting hydrogen production: Implications and applicability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    2. Chen, Hao & Zhang, Chao & Yu, Haizeng & Wang, Zhilin & Duncan, Ian & Zhou, Xianmin & Liu, Xiliang & Wang, Yu & Yang, Shenglai, 2022. "Application of machine learning to evaluating and remediating models for energy and environmental engineering," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    3. Fang, Yi & Paul, Manosh C. & Varjani, Sunita & Li, Xian & Park, Young-Kwon & You, Siming, 2021. "Concentrated solar thermochemical gasification of biomass: Principles, applications, and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Kargbo, Hannah O. & Zhang, Jie & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "Optimisation of two-stage biomass gasification for hydrogen production via artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    5. Xu, Wenwu & Zhang, Jifu & Wu, Qiming & Wang, Yangyang & Zhao, Wenxuan & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Wang, Yinglong & Cui, Peizhe, 2024. "Energy, exergy and economic (3E) analyses of a novel DME-power polygeneration system with CO2 capture based on biomass gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    6. Lv, Chunwang & Wang, Weichao & Ding, Liuyi & Zhou, Weixing & Ma, Zherui & Jia, Jiandong, 2025. "Local data augmentation of biomass gasification performance prediction based on improved generative adversarial network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
    7. Santhappan, Joseph Sekhar & Boddu, Muralikrishna & Gopinath, Arun S. & Mathimani, Thangavel, 2024. "Analysis of 27 supervised machine learning models for the co-gasification assessment of peanut shell and spent tea residue in an open-core downdraft gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Abdul Waheed & Salman Raza Naqvi & Imtiaz Ali, 2022. "Co-Torrefaction Progress of Biomass Residue/Waste Obtained for High-Value Bio-Solid Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Onsree, Thossaporn & Tippayawong, Nakorn, 2021. "Machine learning application to predict yields of solid products from biomass torrefaction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 425-432.
    10. Zhu, Deao & Wang, Qinhui & Zhang, Zijun & Xie, Guilin & Luo, zhongyang, 2025. "Kinetics simulation study of biomass partial gasification for producer gas and biochar co-production in the fluidized bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    11. Duan, Hanqi & Zhang, Zhiqing & Rahman, Md Maksudur & Guo, Xiaojuan & Zhang, Xingguang & Cai, Junmeng, 2020. "Insight into torrefaction of woody biomass: Kinetic modeling using pattern search method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    12. Nadaleti, Willian Cézar & Cardozo, Emanuélle & Bittencourt Machado, Jones & Maximilla Pereira, Peterson & Costa dos Santos, Maele & Gomes de Souza, Eduarda & Haertel, Paula & Kunde Correa, Erico & Vie, 2023. "Hydrogen and electricity potential generation from rice husks and persiculture biomass in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    13. Octávio Alves & Luís Calado & Roberta M. Panizio & Catarina Nobre & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Margarida Gonçalves, 2022. "Gasification of Solid Recovered Fuels with Variable Fractions of Polymeric Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Kotowicz, Janusz & Sobolewski, Aleksander & Iluk, Tomasz, 2013. "Energetic analysis of a system integrated with biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 265-278.
    15. Bhattarai, Ashish & Kafle, Sagar & Sakhakarmy, Manish & Moogi, Surendar & Adhikari, Sushil, 2024. "Fluidized-bed gasification kinetics model development using genetic algorithm for biomass, coal, municipal plastic waste, and their blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    16. Al-Muraisy, Saqr A.A. & Chuayboon, Srirat & Soares, Lais Americo & Buijnsters, J.G. & Ismail, Shahrul bin & Abanades, Stéphane & van Lier, Jules B. & Lindeboom, Ralph E.F., 2025. "Carbon capture through solar-driven CO2 gasification of oil palm empty fruit bunch to produce syngas and biochar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    17. Wang, Linzheng & Zhang, Ruizhi & Deng, Ruiqu & Liu, Zeqing & Luo, Yonghao, 2023. "Comprehensive parametric study of fixed-bed co-gasification process through Multiple Thermally Thick Particle (MTTP) model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    18. Chai, Li & Saffron, Christopher M., 2016. "Comparing pelletization and torrefaction depots: Optimization of depot capacity and biomass moisture to determine the minimum production cost," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 387-395.
    19. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    20. Lv, Xuefei & Lv, Ying & Zhu, Yiping, 2023. "Multi-variable study and MOPSO-based multi-objective optimization of a novel cogeneration plant using biomass fuel and geothermal energy: A complementary hybrid design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:249:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125007384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.