IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v204y2017icp807-818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ultrasonically enhanced anaerobic digestion of thickened waste activated sludge using fluidized bed reactors

Author

Listed:
  • Chowdhury, M.M.I.
  • Nakhla, G.
  • Zhu, J.

Abstract

This study aimed at assessing the impact of ultrasonication on the anaerobic digestibility of thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) in an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor (AnFBR). Two lab-scale AnFBRs treating TWAS were studied to explore the impact of ultrasonication (US) in the dispersing and reuse of scum for methane production. Our current work applied ultrasound energy at 120–600kJ/d for 2s per 30s corresponding to ultrasonication densities of 6–15.7MJ/kg dry-scum-d. At an organic loading rate (OLR) of 5.1kg COD/m3-d and US energy of 11.9MJ/kg dry-scum-d, scum decreased by 82% from 20.2gm/d to 3.7gm/d, and COD and VSS destruction efficiencies were 65% and 63%, respectively roughly 20% higher than the control reactor without US. Scum reduction varied linearly with US energy about 25kJ/g TS was required to break the scum. The energy balance also indicated that the aforementioned US energy of 11.9MJ/kg dry-scum-d was optimum because of energy neutrality. Specific methanogenic activity (SMA) tests showed that the activity-based sludge retention time (SRT) is higher for the ultrasonicated AnFBR (U-AnFBR) (7.1days) compared to AnFBR (5.1days). Furthermore, a higher rate of maximum specific biogas production (Rm) was observed in the U-AnFBR of 26.7ml/gmVSS-hr as compared to 15.7ml/gmVSS-hr for the control AnFBR, with respective suspended biomass activities of 2ml/gmVSS-hr and 4.1ml/gmVSS-hr i.e. confirming that US improved methanogenic activity in the reactor and reduced the detachment of active methanogens.

Suggested Citation

  • Chowdhury, M.M.I. & Nakhla, G. & Zhu, J., 2017. "Ultrasonically enhanced anaerobic digestion of thickened waste activated sludge using fluidized bed reactors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 807-818.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:204:y:2017:i:c:p:807-818
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917309303
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yin, Yao & Liu, Ya-Juan & Meng, Shu-Juan & Kiran, Esra Uçkun & Liu, Yu, 2016. "Enzymatic pretreatment of activated sludge, food waste and their mixture for enhanced bioenergy recovery and waste volume reduction via anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1131-1137.
    2. Koch, Konrad & Drewes, Jörg E., 2014. "Alternative approach to estimate the hydrolysis rate constant of particulate material from batch data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 11-15.
    3. Andalib, Mehran & Elbeshbishy, Elsayed & Mustafa, Nizar & Hafez, Hisham & Nakhla, George & Zhu, Jesse, 2014. "Performance of an anaerobic fluidized bed bioreactor (AnFBR) for digestion of primary municipal wastewater treatment biosolids and bioethanol thin stillage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 276-285.
    4. Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J. & Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Fonoll, X. & Peces, M. & Astals, S., 2014. "A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 412-427.
    5. Zou, Shuzhen & Wang, Hui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Zhou, Sha & Li, Xue & Feng, Yongzhong, 2016. "Application of experimental design techniques in the optimization of the ultrasonic pretreatment time and enhancement of methane production in anaerobic co-digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 191-202.
    6. Wang, Jie & Li, Yongmei, 2016. "Synergistic pretreatment of waste activated sludge using CaO2 in combination with microwave irradiation to enhance methane production during anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1123-1132.
    7. Fernández, N. & Montalvo, S. & Borja, R. & Guerrero, L. & Sánchez, E. & Cortés, I. & Colmenarejo, M.F. & Travieso, L. & Raposo, F., 2008. "Performance evaluation of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor with natural zeolite as support material when treating high-strength distillery wastewater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2458-2466.
    8. Moraes, Bruna S. & Petersen, Søren O. & Zaiat, Marcelo & Sommer, Sven G. & Triolo, Jin Mi, 2017. "Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from vinasse through anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 21-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu Liu & Jun Zhang & Yifan Chen & Ze Guo & Ganzhan Xu & Linlin Yin & Yu Tian & Stevo Lavrnić, 2023. "Anaerobic Fluidized-Bed Membrane Bioreactor for Treatment of Liquid Fraction of Sludge Digestate: Performance and Agricultural Reuse Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Du, Jiliang & Chen, Le & Li, Jianan & Zuo, Ranan & Yang, Xiushan & Chen, Hongzhang & Zhuang, Xinshu & Tian, Shen, 2018. "High-solids ethanol fermentation with single-stage methane anaerobic digestion for maximizing bioenergy conversion from a C4 grass (Pennisetum purpereum)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 437-443.
    3. Çelebi, Emrehan Berkay & Aksoy, Ayşegül & Sanin, F. Dilek, 2021. "Maximizing the energy potential of urban sludge treatment: An experimental study and a scenario-based energy analysis focusing on anaerobic digestion with ultrasound pretreatment and sludge combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siqueira, J.C. & Braga, M.Q. & Ázara, M.S. & Garcia, K.J. & Alencar, S.N.M. & Ramos, T.S. & Siniscalchi, L.A.B. & Assemany, P.P. & Ensinas, A.V., 2022. "Recovery of vinasse with combined microalgae cultivation in a conceptual energy-efficient industrial plant: Analysis of related process considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Ormaechea, P. & Castrillón, L. & Suárez-Peña, B. & Megido, L. & Fernández-Nava, Y. & Negral, L. & Marañón, E. & Rodríguez-Iglesias, J., 2018. "Enhancement of biogas production from cattle manure pretreated and/or co-digested at pilot-plant scale. Characterization by SEM," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 897-904.
    4. Fasil Ayelegn Tassew & Wenche Hennie Bergland & Carlos Dinamarca & Roald Kommedal & Rune Bakke, 2019. "Granular Sludge Bed Processes in Anaerobic Digestion of Particle-Rich Substrates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Kavitha, S. & Banu, J. Rajesh & Priya, A. Arul & Uan, Do Khac & Yeom, Ick Tae, 2017. "Liquefaction of food waste and its impacts on anaerobic biodegradability, energy ratio and economic feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 228-238.
    6. Mao, Chunlan & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2019. "Biogas production and synergistic correlations of systematic parameters during batch anaerobic digestion of corn straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1271-1279.
    7. Tian, Wenjing & Li, Jianhao & Zhu, Lirong & Li, Wen & He, Linyan & Gu, Li & Deng, Rui & Shi, Dezhi & Chai, Hongxiang & Gao, Meng, 2021. "Insights of enhancing methane production under high-solid anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by calcium peroxide pretreatment and zero valent iron addition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1321-1332.
    8. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. de Castro, Thiago Morais & Arantes, Eudes José & de Mendonça Costa, Mônica Sarolli Silva & Gotardo, Jackeline Tatiane & Passig, Fernando Hermes & de Carvalho, Karina Querne & Gomes, Simone Damasceno, 2021. "Anaerobic co-digestion of industrial waste landfill leachate and glycerin in a continuous anaerobic bioreactor with a fixed-structured bed (ABFSB): Effects of volumetric organic loading rate and alkal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1436-1446.
    10. Sohoo, Ihsanullah & Ritzkowski, Marco & Heerenklage, Jörn & Kuchta, Kerstin, 2021. "Biochemical methane potential assessment of municipal solid waste generated in Asian cities: A case study of Karachi, Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Singh, Deval & Tembhare, Mamta & Machhirake, Nitesh & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Biogas generation potential of discarded food waste residue from ultra-processing activities at food manufacturing and packaging industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    12. Liu, Yang & He, Pinjing & Duan, Haowen & Shao, Liming & Lü, Fan, 2021. "Low calcium dosage favors methanation of long-chain fatty acids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    13. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Hailong & Borrion, Aiduan & Yu, Zhixin & Li, Jinhui, 2018. "Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 136-147.
    14. Edwards, Joel & Othman, Maazuza & Burn, Stewart, 2015. "A review of policy drivers and barriers for the use of anaerobic digestion in Europe, the United States and Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 815-828.
    15. Niu, Xian & Zhang, Jianbin & Suo, Yonglu & Fu, Jilagamazhi, 2022. "Proteomic analysis of Fusarium sp. NF01 revealed a multi-level regulatory machinery for lignite biodegradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    16. Chen, Miao & Liu, Shujun & Yuan, Xufeng & Li, Qing X. & Wang, Fengzhong & Xin, Fengjiao & Wen, Boting, 2021. "Methane production and characteristics of the microbial community in the co-digestion of potato pulp waste and dairy manure amended with biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 357-367.
    17. Barbera, Elena & Menegon, Silvia & Banzato, Donatella & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Bertucco, Alberto, 2019. "From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-673.
    18. Dandikas, Vasilis & Heuwinkel, Hauke & Lichti, Fabian & Eckl, Thomas & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Correlation between hydrolysis rate constant and chemical composition of energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 34-42.
    19. Herrera Adarme, Oscar Fernando & Baêta, Bruno Eduardo Lobo & Alves Gurgel, Leandro Vinícius & de Ávila Rodrigues, Fabio & Aquino, Sérgio Francisco de, 2022. "Is anaerobic co-digestion the missing link to integrate sugarcane biorefinery?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 488-496.
    20. Choong, Yee Yaw & Chou, Kian Weng & Norli, Ismail, 2018. "Strategies for improving biogas production of palm oil mill effluent (POME) anaerobic digestion: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2993-3006.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:204:y:2017:i:c:p:807-818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.