IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v201y2017icp174-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game-theoretic modeling of curtailment rules and network investments with distributed generation

Author

Listed:
  • Andoni, Merlinda
  • Robu, Valentin
  • Früh, Wolf-Gerrit
  • Flynn, David

Abstract

Renewable energy has achieved high penetration rates in many areas, leading to curtailment, especially if existing network infrastructure is insufficient and energy generated cannot be exported. In this context, Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) face a significant knowledge gap about how to implement curtailment rules that achieve desired operational objectives, but at the same time minimise disruption and economic losses for renewable generators. In this work, we study the properties of several curtailment rules widely used in UK renewable energy projects, and their effect on the viability of renewable generation investment. Moreover, we propose a new curtailment rule which guarantees fair allocation of curtailment amongst all generators with minimal disruption. Another key knowledge gap faced by DNOs is how to incentivise private network upgrades, especially in settings where several generators can use the same line against the payment of a transmission fee. In this work, we provide a solution to this problem by using tools from algorithmic game theory. Specifically, this setting can be modelled as a Stackelberg game between the private transmission line investor and local renewable generators, who are required to pay a transmission fee to access the line. We provide a method for computing the equilibrium of this game, using a model that captures the stochastic nature of renewable energy generation and demand. Finally, we use the practical setting of a grid reinforcement project from the UK and a large dataset of wind speed measurements and demand to validate our model. We show that charging a transmission fee as a proportion of the feed-in tariff price between 15% and 75% would allow both investors to implement their projects and achieve desirable distribution of the profit. Overall, our results show how using game-theoretic tools can help network operators to bridge the knowledge gap about setting the optimal curtailment rule and determining transmission charges for private network infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Früh, Wolf-Gerrit & Flynn, David, 2017. "Game-theoretic modeling of curtailment rules and network investments with distributed generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 174-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:201:y:2017:i:c:p:174-187
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191730541X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soroudi, Alireza & Ehsan, Mehdi, 2010. "A distribution network expansion planning model considering distributed generation options and techo-economical issues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3364-3374.
    2. Sheikhi Fini, A. & Parsa Moghaddam, M. & Sheikh-El-Eslami, M.K., 2013. "An investigation on the impacts of regulatory support schemes on distributed energy resource expansion planning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 339-349.
    3. Baghaee, H.R. & Mirsalim, M. & Gharehpetian, G.B. & Talebi, H.A., 2016. "Reliability/cost-based multi-objective Pareto optimal design of stand-alone wind/PV/FC generation microgrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1022-1041.
    4. Enzo Sauma & Shmuel Oren, 2006. "Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 358-387, November.
    5. Su, Wencong & Huang, Alex Q., 2014. "A game theoretic framework for a next-generation retail electricity market with high penetration of distributed residential electricity suppliers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 341-350.
    6. Min, C.G. & Kim, M.K. & Park, J.K. & Yoon, Y.T., 2013. "Game-theory-based generation maintenance scheduling in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 310-318.
    7. Zhang, Ni & Yan, Yu & Su, Wencong, 2015. "A game-theoretic economic operation of residential distribution system with high participation of distributed electricity prosumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 471-479.
    8. van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2012. "The economics of planning electricity transmission to accommodate renewables: Using two-stage optimisation to evaluate flexibility and the cost of disregarding uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2089-2101.
    9. Ketter, Wolfgang & Collins, John & Reddy, Prashant, 2013. "Power TAC: A competitive economic simulation of the smart grid," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 262-270.
    10. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2014. "Experience with smarter commercial arrangements for distributed wind generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 52-62.
    11. Robu, Valentin & Chalkiadakis, Georgios & Kota, Ramachandra & Rogers, Alex & Jennings, Nicholas R., 2016. "Rewarding cooperative virtual power plant formation using scoring rules," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P1), pages 19-28.
    12. Hobbs, Benjamin F., 1995. "Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Huppmann, Daniel & Egerer, Jonas, 2015. "National-strategic investment in European power transmission capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 191-203.
    14. Niemi, R. & Lund, P.D., 2010. "Decentralized electricity system sizing and placement in distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(6), pages 1865-1869, June.
    15. Kamalinia, Saeed & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Wu, Lei, 2014. "Sustainable resource planning in energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 112-120.
    16. Kane, Laura & Ault, Graham, 2014. "A review and analysis of renewable energy curtailment schemes and Principles of Access: Transitioning towards business as usual," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 67-77.
    17. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2015. "Options for allocating and releasing distribution system capacity: Deciding between interruptible connections and firm DG connections," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 96-105.
    18. Zeng, Bo & Wen, Junqiang & Shi, Jinyue & Zhang, Jianhua & Zhang, Yuying, 2016. "A multi-level approach to active distribution system planning for efficient renewable energy harvesting in a deregulated environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 614-624.
    19. Lo Prete, Chiara & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2016. "A cooperative game theoretic analysis of incentives for microgrids in regulated electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 524-541.
    20. Rodri­guez Ortega, Mari­a Pi­a & Pérez-Arriaga, J. Ignacio & Abbad, Juan Rivier & González, Jesús Peco, 2008. "Distribution network tariffs: A closed question?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1712-1725, May.
    21. Enzo Sauma & Shmuel Oren, 2006. "Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 261-290, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shukhobodskiy, Alexander Alexandrovich & Colantuono, Giuseppe, 2020. "RED WoLF: Combining a battery and thermal energy reservoirs as a hybrid storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Manuel Castillo-Cagigal & Eduardo Matallanas & Estefanía Caamaño-Martín & Álvaro Gutiérrez Martín, 2018. "SwarmGrid: Demand-Side Management with Distributed Energy Resources Based on Multifrequency Agent Coordination," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Hany Elgamal, Ahmed & Kocher-Oberlehner, Gudrun & Robu, Valentin & Andoni, Merlinda, 2019. "Optimization of a multiple-scale renewable energy-based virtual power plant in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Meunier, Simon & Protopapadaki, Christina & Baetens, Ruben & Saelens, Dirk, 2021. "Impact of residential low-carbon technologies on low-voltage grid reinforcements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    5. Rao, A. Gangoli & van den Oudenalder, F.S.C. & Klein, S.A., 2019. "Natural gas displacement by wind curtailment utilization in combined-cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 477-491.
    6. Yu, Shiwei & Zheng, Yali & Li, Longxi, 2019. "A comprehensive evaluation of the development and utilization of China's regional renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 73-86.
    7. Ri Piao & Deok-Joo Lee & Taegu Kim, 2020. "Real-Time Pricing Scheme in Smart Grid Considering Time Preference: Game Theoretic Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Lu, Qing & Lü, Shuaikang & Leng, Yajun, 2019. "A Nash-Stackelberg game approach in regional energy market considering users’ integrated demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 456-470.
    9. Wiesheu, Michael & Rutešić, Luka & Shukhobodskiy, Alexander Alexandrovich & Pogarskaia, Tatiana & Zaitcev, Aleksandr & Colantuono, Giuseppe, 2021. "RED WoLF hybrid storage system: Adaptation of algorithm and analysis of performance in residential dwellings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1036-1048.
    10. Gu, Chenghong & Yan, Xiaohe & Yan, Zhang & Li, Furong, 2017. "Dynamic pricing for responsive demand to increase distribution network efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 236-243.
    11. Norbu, Sonam & Couraud, Benoit & Robu, Valentin & Andoni, Merlinda & Flynn, David, 2021. "Modelling the redistribution of benefits from joint investments in community energy projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    12. Li, Tao & Li, Ang & Guo, Xiaopeng, 2020. "The sustainable development-oriented development and utilization of renewable energy industry——A comprehensive analysis of MCDM methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    13. Kirli, Desen & Couraud, Benoit & Robu, Valentin & Salgado-Bravo, Marcelo & Norbu, Sonam & Andoni, Merlinda & Antonopoulos, Ioannis & Negrete-Pincetic, Matias & Flynn, David & Kiprakis, Aristides, 2022. "Smart contracts in energy systems: A systematic review of fundamental approaches and implementations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Zhang, Xian & Chan, K.W. & Wang, Huaizhi & Hu, Jiefeng & Zhou, Bin & Zhang, Yan & Qiu, Jing, 2019. "Game-theoretic planning for integrated energy system with independent participants considering ancillary services of power-to-gas stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 249-264.
    15. Konstantakopoulos, Ioannis C. & Barkan, Andrew R. & He, Shiying & Veeravalli, Tanya & Liu, Huihan & Spanos, Costas, 2019. "A deep learning and gamification approach to improving human-building interaction and energy efficiency in smart infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 810-821.
    16. Bowen Tang & Yuanzhang Sun & Nan Zhou & Bo Shen, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Power Retailers and Industrial Parks in China’s Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grimm, Veronika & Grübel, Julia & Rückel, Bastian & Sölch, Christian & Zöttl, Gregor, 2020. "Storage investment and network expansion in distribution networks: The impact of regulatory frameworks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Farrell, Niall & Devine, Mel T. & Soroudi, Alireza, 2018. "An auction framework to integrate dynamic transmission expansion planning and pay-as-bid wind connection auctions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2462-2477.
    3. Motalleb, Mahdi & Annaswamy, Anuradha & Ghorbani, Reza, 2018. "A real-time demand response market through a repeated incomplete-information game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 424-438.
    4. Churkin, Andrey & Bialek, Janusz & Pozo, David & Sauma, Enzo & Korgin, Nikolay, 2021. "Review of Cooperative Game Theory applications in power system expansion planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Munoz, Francisco D. & van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Watson, Jean-Paul, 2017. "Does risk aversion affect transmission and generation planning? A Western North America case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 213-225.
    6. Kasina, Saamrat & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2020. "The value of cooperation in interregional transmission planning: A noncooperative equilibrium model approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 740-752.
    7. Grimm, Veronika & Martin, Alexander & Schmidt, Martin & Weibelzahl, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2016. "Transmission and generation investment in electricity markets: The effects of market splitting and network fee regimes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 493-509.
    8. Motalleb, Mahdi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2017. "Non-cooperative game-theoretic model of demand response aggregator competition for selling stored energy in storage devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 581-596.
    9. Acuña, Luceny Guzmán & Ríos, Diana Ramírez & Arboleda, Carlos Paternina & Ponzón, Esneyder González, 2018. "Cooperation model in the electricity energy market using bi-level optimization and Shapley value," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 161-168.
    10. Farrell, Niall & Devine, Mel, 2015. "How do External Costs affect Pay-as-bid Renewable Energy Connection Auctions?," Papers WP517, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    11. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Palovic, Martin, 2022. "Administrative congestion management meets electricity network regulation: Aligning incentives between the renewable generators and network operator," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Martin Weibelzahl & Alexandra Märtz, 2020. "Optimal storage and transmission investments in a bilevel electricity market model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 911-940, April.
    14. Paul Simshauser & Farhad Billimoria & Craig Rogers, 2021. "Optimising VRE plant capacity in Renewable Energy Zones," Working Papers EPRG2121, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    15. Fridgen, Gilbert & Kahlen, Micha & Ketter, Wolfgang & Rieger, Alexander & Thimmel, Markus, 2018. "One rate does not fit all: An empirical analysis of electricity tariffs for residential microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 800-814.
    16. Kang, Jidong & Wu, Zhuochun & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2023. "A stochastic-robust optimization model for inter-regional power system planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1234-1248.
    17. Wu, Qiong & Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun & Ren, Jianxing, 2017. "Benefit allocation for distributed energy network participants applying game theory based solutions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 384-391.
    18. Hadush, Samson Yemane & Meeus, Leonardo, 2018. "DSO-TSO cooperation issues and solutions for distribution grid congestion management," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 610-621.
    19. Ambrosius, M. & Egerer, J. & Grimm, V. & Weijde, A.H. van der, 2020. "Uncertain bidding zone configurations: The role of expectations for transmission and generation capacity expansion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 343-359.
    20. Simshauser, Paul, 2021. "Renewable Energy Zones in Australia's National Electricity Market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:201:y:2017:i:c:p:174-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.