IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender essentialism and occupational segregation in insolvency practice


  • Joyce, Yvonne
  • Walker, Stephen P.


Advances towards egalitarianism in professional recruitment may be offset by processes of occupational re-segregation. Drawing on gender theory this paper investigates horizontal segregation in the UK insolvency profession, as revealed through the lived experiences of female and male practitioners. It is shown that horizontal segregation pervades at different levels of practice and is undergirded by various elements of gender essentialism. Physical essentialism explains why insolvency practice has been traditionally gendered male. Interactional essentialism combines with the management of work-life balance to define the subfields of corporate and personal insolvency as masculine and feminine respectively. Gender essentialist assumptions also pervade the distribution of roles and the allocation of work tasks. Networks are identified as arenas for the reproduction and perpetuation of occupational segregation. The findings indicate the continuing potency of gender in everyday professional life, the limitations of diversity-orientated policies and the complexities of formulating transformative agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • Joyce, Yvonne & Walker, Stephen P., 2015. "Gender essentialism and occupational segregation in insolvency practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 41-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:40:y:2015:i:c:p:41-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.001

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Yves Breitmoser & Jonathan Tan & Daniel Zizzo, 2010. "Understanding perpetual R&D races," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 44(3), pages 445-467, September.
    2. Anderson-Gough, Fiona & Grey, Christopher & Robson, Keith, 2005. ""Helping them to forget..": the organizational embedding of gender relations in public audit firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 469-490, July.
    3. Kornberger, Martin & Carter, Chris & Ross-Smith, Anne, 2010. "Changing gender domination in a Big Four accounting firm: Flexibility, performance and client service in practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 775-791, November.
    4. Keely, Louise C. & Tan, Chih Ming, 2008. "Understanding preferences for income redistribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(5-6), pages 944-961, June.
    5. Brooks, Fiona, 1998. "Women in general practice: Responding to the sexual division of labour?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 181-193, July.
    6. Louise Ashley, 2010. "Making a difference? The use (and abuse) of diversity management at the UK's elite law firms," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 24(4), pages 711-727, December.
    7. Kathryn Haynes, 2008. "Moving the gender agenda or stirring chicken's entrails?: Where next for feminist methodologies in accounting?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 21(4), pages 539-555, May.
    8. Cooper, Christine & Taylor, Phil, 2000. "From Taylorism to Ms Taylor: the transformation of the accounting craft," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 555-578, August.
    9. Walker, Stephen P., 1995. "The genesis of professional organization in scotland: a contextual analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 285-310, May.
    10. Stephen Walker, 2011. "Professions and patriarchy revisited. Accountancy in England and Wales, 1887-1914," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 185-225.
    11. Watts, Martin & Rich, Judith, 1993. "Occupational Sex Segregation in Britain, 1979-1989: The Persistence of Sexual Stereotyping," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 159-177, June.
    12. Roberts, Jennifer & Coutts, J. Andrew, 1992. "Feminization and professionalization: A review of an emerging literature on the development of accounting in the United Kingdom," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 17(3-4), pages 379-395.
    13. Claudia Goldin, 2014. "A Pollution Theory of Discrimination: Male and Female Differences in Occupations and Earnings," NBER Chapters,in: Human Capital in History: The American Record, pages 313-348 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Bougen, Philip D., 1994. "Joking apart: The serious side to the accountant stereotype," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 319-335, April.
    15. Howard Stein & Steven Rosefielde, 1999. "An Introduction to the Symposium," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 25(4), pages 379-387, Fall.
    16. Claire Dambrin & Caroline Lambert, 2008. "Mothering or auditing? The case of two Big Four in France," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 21(4), pages 474-506, May.
    17. Walker, Stephen P., 2004. "The genesis of professional organisation in English accountancy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 127-156, February.
    18. Sonja Gallhofer & Catriona Paisey & Clare Roberts & Heather Tarbert, 2011. "Preferences, constraints and work-lifestyle choices: The case of female Scottish chartered accountants," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(4), pages 440-470, May.
    19. Jane Broadbent & Linda Kirkham, 2008. "Glass ceilings, glass cliffs or new worlds?: Revisiting gender and accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 21(4), pages 465-473, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:crpeac:v:43:y:2017:i:c:p:110-124 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:40:y:2015:i:c:p:41-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.