IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v47y1998i2p181-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women in general practice: Responding to the sexual division of labour?

Author

Listed:
  • Brooks, Fiona

Abstract

This paper provides an exploration of the gendered nature of the working experience of women within a high status and predominantly male dominated medical specialty, that of general practice or primary care physician. Women currently represent just over a third of all general practitioners in the U.K. and their numbers have been increasing. Women now account for 60% of new recruits into general practice. Despite this increase, consideration of the experience and role of women within medicine has largely focused on hospital medicine. The findings presented are derived from a three year project, that aimed to develop an understanding of the role women health workers play in the U.K. in the construction and provision of primary health care services for women. The methods employed consisted of a series of postal surveys and qualitative interviews conducted with GPs, female nurses and women service users. The first section of the discussion provides an exploration of the nature and impact of the sexual division of labour within general practice and the resulting occupational marginalisation of women GPs. Attention is given to identifying the key processes whereby the sexual division of labour is maintained and reproduced, particularly through the normative expectations of colleagues, patients and women GPs themselves. The final section presents a typology of the differing strategies the sampled women GPs adopted for managing their working roles in response to the existence of a sexual division of labour. The conclusion highlights the possible impact of the differing strategies upon the functioning of women within general practice and their relationship with women users of the service.

Suggested Citation

  • Brooks, Fiona, 1998. "Women in general practice: Responding to the sexual division of labour?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 181-193, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:2:p:181-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(98)00058-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruth Young & Brenda Leese & Bonnie Sibbald, 2001. "Imbalances in the GP Labour Market in the UK: Evidence from a Postal Survey and Interviews with GP Leavers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 15(4), pages 699-719, December.
    2. Joyce, Yvonne & Walker, Stephen P., 2015. "Gender essentialism and occupational segregation in insolvency practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 41-60.
    3. Van den Brink, Marieke, 2011. "Scouting for talent: Appointment practices of women professors in academic medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(12), pages 2033-2040, June.
    4. Midttun, Linda, 2007. "Medical specialists' allocation of working time," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 114-127, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:2:p:181-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.