IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v15y2001i4p699-719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imbalances in the GP Labour Market in the UK: Evidence from a Postal Survey and Interviews with GP Leavers

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Young

    (University of Manchester)

  • Brenda Leese

    (University of Manchester)

  • Bonnie Sibbald

    (University of Manchester)

Abstract

There is concern that the UK general practitioner (GP) workforce has declined relative to the expanding needs of a primary care-led NHS. Much of the debate about possible solutions within the profession and amongst medical workforce planners has focused on the need to raise medical school intakes and recruit more new GPs. However, other evidence shows that, as with medicine in general, a differential relationship exists in the GP labour market based upon socially ascribed characteristics. It follows that many already qualified GPs (e.g. women, ethnic minority and older doctors) are under-used in the context of generally accepted career structures. Hence, we would argue, part of the solution to workforce shortages lies in better retention and management of existing human resources. This paper first suggests a simple re-conceptualisation, which will help to frame a more sophisticated analysis than so far used for workforce planning of the nature of GP demand and supply. The framework is then used to explore the findings of the first ever national survey (n=621) and follow-up interviews (n=32) with a cohort of GP principal leavers. These showed that a variety of more flexible employment arrangements are needed in order to improve both GP recruitment and retention. In taking this approach, the paper also explores the potential implications of changing social trends for the structure of the GP profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Young & Brenda Leese & Bonnie Sibbald, 2001. "Imbalances in the GP Labour Market in the UK: Evidence from a Postal Survey and Interviews with GP Leavers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 15(4), pages 699-719, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:15:y:2001:i:4:p:699-719
    DOI: 10.1177/095001701400438161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001701400438161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001701400438161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brooks, Fiona, 1998. "Women in general practice: Responding to the sexual division of labour?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 181-193, July.
    2. Jane Griffin, 1996. "The Future of Primary Care," Monograph 000418, Office of Health Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deborah Peikes & Grace Anglin & Stacy Dale & Erin Fries Taylor & Ann O'Malley & Arkadipta Ghosh & Kaylyn Swankoski & Jesse Crosson & Rosalind Keith & Anne Mutti & Sheila Hoag & Pragya Singh & Ha Tu & , "undated". "Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Fourth Annual Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 31b437e81685456388e78e18b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Sue Jenkins-Clarke & Roy Carr-Hill & Paul Dixon & Mike Pringle, 1997. "Skill mix in Primary Care: a study of the interface between the general practitioner and other members of the Primary Health Care Team," Working Papers 28cheop, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    3. Elizabeth H Bradley & Patrick Byam & Rachelle Alpern & Jennifer W Thompson & Abraham Zerihun & Yigeremu Abeb & Leslie A Curry, 2012. "A Systems Approach to Improving Rural Care in Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7, April.
    4. repec:mpr:mprres:7852 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Roberts, Emilie & Mays, Nicholas, 1998. "Can primary care and community-based models of emergency care substitute for the hospital accident and emergency (A & E) department?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 191-214, June.
    6. Chen Jiajia & van den Berghe Eunkyung & Kaestner Robert, 2019. "Is Primary Care A Substitute or Complement for Other Medical Care? Evidence from Medicaid," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 1-36, June.
    7. Leslie A Curry & Patrick Byam & Erika Linnander & Kyeen M Andersson & Yigeremu Abebe & Abraham Zerihun & Jennifer W Thompson & Elizabeth H Bradley, 2013. "Evaluation of the Ethiopian Millennium Rural Initiative: Impact on Mortality and Cost-Effectiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-6, November.
    8. Shanshan Feng & Leiyu Shi & Jiazhi Zeng & Wen Chen & Li Ling, 2017. "Comparison of Primary Care Experiences in Village Clinics with Different Ownership Models in Guangdong Province, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Joyce, Yvonne & Walker, Stephen P., 2015. "Gender essentialism and occupational segregation in insolvency practice," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 41-60.
    10. Chris Bojke & Hugh Gravelle & Karen Hassell & Zoe Whittington, 2004. "Increasing patient choice in primary care: the management of minor ailments," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 73-86, January.
    11. Pham, Mai & McRae, Ian, 2015. "Who provides GP after-hours care?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(4), pages 447-455.
    12. Lohr, Kathleen N. & Eleazer, Kristen & Mauskopf, Josephine, 1998. "Health policy issues and applications for evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Edward Godber & Ray Robinson & Andrea Steiner, 1997. "Economic Evaluation and the Shifting Balance Towards Primary Care: Definitions, Evidence and Methodological Issues," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(3), pages 275-294, May.
    14. Kulu-Glasgow, Isik & Delnoij, Diana & de Bakker, Dinny, 1998. "Self-referral in a gatekeeping system: patients' reasons for skipping the general-practitioner," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 221-238, September.
    15. Penrose, Perran, 1998. "Cost Sharing in Education - Public Finance, School and Household Perspectives," Education Research Papers 12878, Department for International Development (DFID) (UK).
    16. Van den Brink, Marieke, 2011. "Scouting for talent: Appointment practices of women professors in academic medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(12), pages 2033-2040, June.
    17. Paula González, 2010. "Gatekeeping versus direct‐access when patient information matters," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(6), pages 730-754, June.
    18. Majumder, Amlan, 2014. "Economics of health care utilisation: a study of self-reported morbidity and health seeking patterns in the districts of Cooch Behar and Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, India," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 110899, September.
    19. De Allegri, Manuela & Sanon, Mamadou & Bridges, John & Sauerborn, Rainer, 2006. "Understanding consumers' preferences and decision to enrol in community-based health insurance in rural West Africa," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 58-71, March.
    20. Eugene C. Rich, "undated". "Payment Reform to Transform Primary Care: What More Is Needed?," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 50f5486843204abfb9be2fcd6, Mathematica Policy Research.
    21. Karen Bloor & Alan Maynard, 1998. "Labour markets in the UK National Health Service: incentives, contracts and health care teams," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 127-129.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:15:y:2001:i:4:p:699-719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.