IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2021-04-21.html

Decommissioning Planning of Offshore Oil and Gas Fields in Vietnam: What Can be Learnt from Mine Closure Planning in Scotland?

Author

Listed:
  • Huyen Thi Le

    (PetroVietnam University, Vietnam)

  • Janet Xuanli Liao

    (Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee, Scotland,)

  • Christopher J. Spray

    (School of Social Sciences, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee, Scotland.)

Abstract

Due to the lack of necessary requirements in the existing regulations for decommissioning of offshore oil and gas fields in Vietnam, this paper makes policy recommendations based on the comparison between the decommissioning planning of offshore oil and gas fields in Vietnam and the similar closure planning of opencast coal mines in Scotland. The comparative analysis shows that there is interplay between the project context and restoration/decommissioning outcomes in the cases of three opencast coal mines in East Ayrshire, Scotland and X oil field in Vietnam. The influencing contextual factors in both cases can be categorized as biophysical and material conditions, community attributes, biodiversity s interest, socioeconomic context and rules. Based on such analysis, additional issues should be considered while preparing future decommissioning plans and updating relevant laws in Vietnam. Particular challenges include compliance monitoring, shell mounds, drill cuttings, financial assurance, consultation with local communities and recognition of their interests, rigs-to-reefs, coastal communities socioeconomic development, and investment in research, training and education about oil and gas decommissioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Huyen Thi Le & Janet Xuanli Liao & Christopher J. Spray, 2021. "Decommissioning Planning of Offshore Oil and Gas Fields in Vietnam: What Can be Learnt from Mine Closure Planning in Scotland?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 11(4), pages 162-174.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-04-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/11196/5906
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/11196/5906
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Osmundsen, Petter & Tveteras, Ragnar, 2003. "Decommissioning of petroleum installations--major policy issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 1579-1588, December.
    2. Techera, Erika J. & Chandler, John, 2015. "Offshore installations, decommissioning and artificial reefs: Do current legal frameworks best serve the marine environment?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 53-60.
    3. Peck, Philip & Sinding, Knud, 2009. "Financial assurance and mine closure: Stakeholder expectations and effects on operating decisions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 227-233, December.
    4. repec:wbk:wbpubs:6746 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adkins, Roger & Paxson, Dean, 2019. "Rescaling-contraction with a lower cost technology when revenue declines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 574-586.
    2. Abdo, Hafez & Mangena, Musa & Needham, Graham & Hunt, David, 2018. "Disclosure of provisions for decommissioning costs in annual reports of oil and gas companies: A content analysis and stakeholder views," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 341-358.
    3. Ronyastra, I Made & Saw, Lip Huat & Low, Foon Siang, 2023. "A review of methods for integrating risk management and multicriteria decision analysis in financial feasibility for post-coal-mining land usage selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    4. Cornelie Crous & John R. Owen & Lochner Marais & Samkelisiwe Khanyile & Deanna Kemp, 2021. "Public disclosure of mine closures by listed South African mining companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1032-1042, May.
    5. Sara Aghakazemjourabbaf & Margaret Insley, 2018. "Optimal timing of harzardous waste clean-up under an environmental bond an a strict liability rule," Working Papers 1803, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised 06 Jan 2018.
    6. Gregory, Gillian H., 2021. "Rendering mine closure governable and constraints to inclusive development in the Andean region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Emeka Ndaguba & Lochner Marais, 2024. "A scientometric analysis of mine closure research," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27787-27803, November.
    8. Yang, Peifang & Davis, Graham A., 2021. "Why don't environmental bonds fully cover reclamation costs?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Leporini, Mariella & Marchetti, Barbara & Corvaro, Francesco & Polonara, Fabio, 2019. "Reconversion of offshore oil and gas platforms into renewable energy sites production: Assessment of different scenarios," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1121-1132.
    10. Parente, Virginia & Ferreira, Doneivan & Moutinho dos Santos, Edmilson & Luczynski, Estanislau, 2006. "Offshore decommissioning issues: Deductibility and transferability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(15), pages 1992-2001, October.
    11. Aghakazemjourabbaf, Sara & Insley, Margaret, 2021. "Leaving your tailings behind: Environmental bonds, bankruptcy and waste cleanup," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Vincenzo Basile & Roberto Vona, 2023. "Sustainable and Circular Business Model for Oil & Gas Offshore Platform Decommissioning," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(10), pages 1-1, February.
    13. Davies Wambwa & Jhonnah Mundike & Brian Chirambo, 2025. "Balancing economic development, social responsibility, and environmental conservation through financial assurance programs in sub-Saharan Africa’s mining industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5869-5892, March.
    14. Jorge Ramos & Benjamin Drakeford & Ana Madiedo & Joana Costa & Francisco Leitão, 2024. "A Bayesian Approach to Infer the Sustainable Use of Artificial Reefs in Fisheries and Recreation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Petter Osmundsen & Ragnar Tveterås, 2000. "Disposal of Petroleum Installations - Major Policy Issues," CESifo Working Paper Series 280, CESifo.
    16. Sedlar, D. Karasalihović & Vulin, D. & Krajačić, G. & Jukić, L., 2019. "Offshore gas production infrastructure reutilisation for blue energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 159-174.
    17. Vincenzo Basile & Nunzia Capobianco & Roberto Vona, 2021. "The usefulness of sustainable business models: Analysis from oil and gas industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1801-1821, November.
    18. Collins, Benjamin C. & Kumral, Mustafa, 2020. "Game theory for analyzing and improving environmental management in the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Noor Amila Wan Abdullah Zawawi & Kamaluddeen Usman Danyaro & M. S. Liew & Lim Eu Shawn, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability and Efficiency of Offshore Platform Decommissioning: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Aad Correljé & Lucia van Geuns, 2011. "The Oil Industry: A Dynamic Patchwork of Approaches?," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-04-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.