IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-11-00091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Implications of Quantity-Discounted Transportation Rates on Output Effect of Discriminatory F.O.B. Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Yeung-nan Shieh

    (Department of Economics, San Jose State University)

Abstract

This paper examines the theoretical implications of quantity-discounted transportation rates on output effect of discriminatory f.o.b. mill pricing. Assume that the plant location of a monopoly is predetermined and demand curves are linear at two separate markets. It shows that total output under either discriminatory f.o.b. mill pricing or simple f.o.b. mill pricing remains the same when transportation rates are constant or linear. It further shows that total output will be greater under discriminatory f.o.b. mill pricing than under simple f.o.b. mill pricing when the transportation rate curve is convex in the market with less elastic demand and the transportation rate curve is concave in the market with more elastic demand. This indicates that the quantity-discounted transportation rates have an important influence on the output effect of spatial price discrimination.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeung-nan Shieh, 2011. "The Implications of Quantity-Discounted Transportation Rates on Output Effect of Discriminatory F.O.B. Pricing," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(2), pages 1288-1294.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-11-00091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2011/Volume31/EB-11-V31-I2-P121.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hwang, Hong & Mai, Chao-cheng, 1990. "Effects of Spatial Price Discrimination on Output, Welfare, and Location," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(3), pages 567-575, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debashis Pal, 1994. "Cournot Competition and Spatial Agglomeration," Microeconomics 9402002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Stefano Colombo, 2016. "Location choices with a non-linear demand function," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95, pages 215-226, March.
    3. Noriaki Matsushima & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2003. "Mixed oligopoly and spatial agglomeration," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 36(1), pages 62-87, February.
    4. Yeung-Nan Shieh, 2010. "The implications of quantity discounted transportation rates on output effect of spatial price discrimination," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 71-77, July.
    5. Wen-Chung Guo & Fu-Chuan Lai, 2015. "Spatial Cournot competition in a linear–circular market," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 819-834, May.
    6. Chia-Hung Sun & Fu-Chuan Lai, 2014. "Spatial price discrimination in a symmetric barbell model: Bertrand vs. Cournot," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 141-158, March.
    7. Kuang-Cheng Andy Wang & Yi-Jie Wang & Wen-Jung Liang, 2021. "Comparing Cournot and Bertrand Equilibria in the Presence of Spatial Barriers and R&D," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 58(3), pages 475-491, May.
    8. Hong Hwang & Chao‐Cheng Mai & Hiroshi Ohta, 2010. "Who Benefits From Pricing Regulations When Economic Space Matters?," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 218-233, June.
    9. Stefano Colombo, 2016. "A Model of Three Cities," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(4), pages 386-416, October.
    10. Noriaki Matsushima & Laixun Zhao, 2015. "Multimarket Linkages, Trade and the Productivity Puzzle," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Lin-Ti Tan & Yan-Shu Lin, 2005. "Spatial Monopoly Pricing in a Stochastic Environment," IEAS Working Paper : academic research 05-A004, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
    12. Stefano Colombo, 2011. "Spatial price discrimination in the unidirectional Hotelling model with elastic demand," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 157-169, March.
    13. Teodora Dan & Andrea Lodi & Patrice Marcotte, 2020. "Joint location and pricing within a user-optimized environment," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(1), pages 61-84, March.
    14. Stefano Colombo, 2013. "Differentiated Bertrand markets: restoring the minimum differentiation principle," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 103-108, July.
    15. Wen-Chung Guo & Fu-Chuan Lai, 2013. "The role of an intermediate market within the barbell model," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 151-161, November.
    16. Shin‐kun Peng, 2004. "Spatial Monopoly with Product Differentiation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 70(3), pages 646-660, January.
    17. Liang, Wen-Jung & Hwang, Hong & Mai, Chao-Cheng, 2006. "Spatial discrimination: Bertrand vs. Cournot with asymmetric demands," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 790-802, November.
    18. Jen-Te Yao, 2019. "The impact of transportation asymmetry on the choice of a spatial price policy," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 793-811, October.
    19. Kai Andree, 2013. "Collusion in Spatially Separated Markets with Quantity Competition," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 309-318, September.
    20. Ziying Yang & Félix Muñoz-García, 2018. "Can Banning Spatial Price Discrimination Improve Social Welfare?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 223-243, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    discriminatory f.o.b. pricing; quantity-discounted transportation rates; output effect;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D4 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design
    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-11-00091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.