IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v53y2025i3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Special times? How COVID-specific concerns disrupted fertility desires in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Yining Yang

    (Yale University)

  • Grace Kao

    (Yale University)

Abstract

Background: Despite growing research on fertility during COVID-19, the precise mechanisms underlying fertility responses to the pandemic remain poorly understood. Objective: We specifically focus on COVID-19 mitigation policies and the health implications of COVID-19. We examine whether disruptions in fertility desires during COVID-19 can be attributed to material and emotional hardships – comparable to those observed in other crises – or if they are uniquely linked to broader concerns specific to the pandemic itself. Methods: We used original data from a nationally representative longitudinal survey on well-being during COVID-19 in the United States (N = 2,433). We first conducted exploratory factor analysis to examine the underlying relationships between various views related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Then we employed multinomial logistic regression and linear regression models to examine how COVID-specific concerns and hardships were associated with fertility desires in late 2020 and late 2021. Results: Material and emotional hardships were associated with less stable fertility desires in late 2020 and late 2021. However, generalized concerns related to the pandemic, including restrictions of daily activities due to social distancing and worries about contracting and spreading the virus, were associated with a decrease in fertility desires in late 2020, even after accounting for hardships. Suggestive evidence shows that these COVID-specific concerns remained negatively associated with fertility desires in late 2021. Conclusions: Beyond material and emotional hardships brought by COVID-19, concerns surrounding the pandemic itself may have had a distinct impact on fertility desires. Contribution: This study contributes to the mechanisms underlying fertility responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Yining Yang & Grace Kao, 2025. "Special times? How COVID-specific concerns disrupted fertility desires in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(3), pages 47-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:3
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol53/3/53-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finlay, Jocelyn E., 2009. "Fertility response to natural disasters : the case of three high mortality earthquakes," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4883, The World Bank.
    2. Butz, William P & Ward, Michael P, 1979. "The Emergence of Countercyclical U.S. Fertility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(3), pages 318-328, June.
    3. Arianna Gatta & Francesco Mattioli & Letizia Mencarini & Daniele Vignoli, 2022. "Employment uncertainty and fertility intentions: Stability or resilience?," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 387-406, September.
    4. repec:osf:socarx:mvy62_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Anna Matysiak & Tomáš Sobotka & Daniele Vignoli, 2021. "The Great Recession and Fertility in Europe: A Sub-national Analysis," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(1), pages 29-64, March.
    6. Priya Ranjan, 1999. "Fertility Behaviour under Income Uncertainty," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 15(1), pages 25-43, March.
    7. Joseph Rodgers & Craig John & Ronnie Coleman, 2005. "Did fertility go up after the oklahoma city bombing? An analysis of births in metropolitan counties in Oklahoma, 1990–1999," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 42(4), pages 675-692, November.
    8. Sobotka, Tomas & Jasilioniene, Aiva & Galarza, Ainhoa Alustiza & Zeman, Kryštof & Nemeth, Laszlo & Jdanov, Dmitri, 2021. "Baby bust in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic? First results from the new STFF data series," SocArXiv mvy62, Center for Open Science.
    9. Wendy D. Manning & Karen Benjamin Guzzo & Monica A. Longmore & Peggy C. Giordano, 2022. "Cognitive schemas and fertility motivations in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 20(1), pages 261-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thaís García-Pereiro & Anna Paterno, 2025. "Nonnationals’ Fertility and the Great Recession in Italy: A Panel Analysis of Quantum and Tempo Responses," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 11(1), pages 175-209, March.
    2. Anna Matysiak & Daniele Vignoli, 2024. "Family Life Courses, Uncertain Futures, and the Changing World of Work: State-of-the-Art and Prospects," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Lazzari, Ester & Reimondos, Anna & Gray, Edith, 2022. "Childbearing desires before and after the Covid-19 outbreak in Australia: Who changed their attitudes toward having a first or additional child?," SocArXiv qbgmp, Center for Open Science.
    4. Karen Benjamin Guzzo & Anna Belykh & Wendy Manning & Monica Longmore & Peggy Giordano & Sara Roza, 2025. "Perceptions of the Future and Pregnancy Avoidance in the U.S," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(3), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Brienna Perelli-Harris & Theodore Gerber & Yuliya Hilevych, 2024. "Uncertainty and Fertility in Ukraine on the Eve of Russia’s Full-Scale Invasion: The Impact of Armed Conflict and Economic Crisis," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Heather M. Rackin & Christina M. Gibson‐Davis, 2022. "Familial Deaths and First Birth," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 1027-1059, December.
    7. Arindam Nandi & Sumit Mazumdar & Jere R. Behrman, 2018. "The effect of natural disaster on fertility, birth spacing, and child sex ratio: evidence from a major earthquake in India," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 31(1), pages 267-293, January.
    8. Tomáš Sobotka & Kryštof Zeman & Aiva Jasilioniene & Maria Winkler‐Dworak & Zuzanna Brzozowska & Ainhoa Alustiza‐Galarza & László Németh & Dmitri Jdanov, 2024. "Pandemic Roller‐Coaster? Birth Trends in Higher‐Income Countries During the COVID‐19 Pandemic," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 50(S1), pages 23-58, July.
    9. Bastien Chabé-Ferret & Paula Eugenia Gobbi, 2018. "Economics Uncertainty and Fertility Cycles: The Case of the Post-WWII Baby Boom," Working Papers ECARES 2018-19, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Sven Fischer, 2023. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Marriage and Childbirth: Survey-based Evidence from Iran," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202320, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    11. Ester Lazzari & Anna Reimondos & Edith Gray, 2024. "Did the COVID‐19 Pandemic Affect Fertility Desires in Australia? Understanding Why People Changed Their Attitudes towards Having a First or Additional Child," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 50(S1), pages 243-276, July.
    12. Arpino, Bruno & LUPPI, FRANCESCA & Rosina, Alessandro, 2021. "Changes in fertility plans during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: the role of occupation and income vulnerability," SocArXiv 4sjvm, Center for Open Science.
    13. Fontaine, Idriss & Garabedian, Sabine & Vérèmes, Hélène, 2024. "Tropical cyclones and fertility: New evidence from developing countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Jenna Nobles & Elizabeth Frankenberg & Duncan Thomas, 2014. "The Effects of Mortality on Fertility: Population Dynamics after a Natural Disaster," NBER Working Papers 20448, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Giray Gozgor & Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Peter Rangazas, 2021. "Economic Uncertainty and Fertility," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 15(3), pages 373-399.
    16. Chiara Ludovica Comolli, 2023. "Social Climate, Uncertainty and Fertility Intentions: from the Great Recession to the Covid-19 Crisis," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-57, December.
    17. Natalie Nitsche & D. Susie Lee, 2022. "Emotion and fertility in times of disaster: conceptualizing fertility responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2022-020, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    18. Boberg-Fazlic, Nina & Ivets, Maryna & Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese, 2021. "Disease and fertility: Evidence from the 1918–19 influenza pandemic in Sweden," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    19. Xu, Guo, 2011. "Long-run consequences of natural disasters: Evidence from Tangshan," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 82, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    20. Karel Neels & Leen Marynissen & Jonas Wood, 2024. "Economic Cycles and Entry into Parenthood: Is the Association Changing and Does it Affect Macro-Level Trends? Micro-Level Hazard and Simulation Models of Belgian Fertility Trends, 1960–2010," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 1-34, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.