IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2024i2p53-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Ethical Ideology Exacerbates the Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Workplace Deviance

Author

Listed:
  • Imran Hussain

    (School of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, India)

Abstract

Workplace deviance is an alarming phenomenon that causes immense loss in many organizations. Among many factors, Machiavellianism, a personality variable often identified by amoral and manipulative acts leads to deviance of an employee. The present paper assumes that Machiavellianism will be positively related to employee’s interpersonal and organizational deviance. We also hypothesized that ethical ideology will moderate the relationship of Machiavellianism towards employee’s interpersonal and organizational deviance. Authors verified the formulated hypotheses by using 256 data collected from mid-level managerial employees working in IT and software companies based in Delhi (India). Data analyses were carried out through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and moderated regression analysis. Results reveal significant and positive contribution of Machiavellianism towards employee’s workplace deviance. Ethical ideology significantly moderates the relationship between Machiavellianism and employee’s interpersonal and organizational deviance. Results and implications of the study are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Imran Hussain, 2024. "How Ethical Ideology Exacerbates the Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Workplace Deviance," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 53-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2024:i:2:p:53-61
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2024_2/Hussain.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Fernando & Shyamali Dharmage & Shamika Almeida, 2008. "Ethical Ideologies of Senior Australian Managers: An Empirical Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 145-155, September.
    2. Yoav Vardi & Yoash Wiener, 1996. "Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 151-165, April.
    3. Stephanie Hastings & Joan Finegan, 2011. "The Role of Ethical Ideology in Reactions to Injustice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(4), pages 689-703, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stea, Diego & Foss, Nicolai J. & Christensen, Peter Holdt, 2015. "Physical separation in the workplace: Separation cues, separation awareness, and employee motivation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 462-471.
    2. Pnina Soffer & Nesi Outmazgin & Irit Hadar & Shay Tzafrir, 2023. "Why Work Around the Process? Analyzing Workarounds Through the Lens of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(4), pages 369-389, August.
    3. Michaela Haase & Emmanuel Raufflet, 2017. "Ideologies in Markets, Organizations, and Business Ethics: Drafting a Map: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 629-639, June.
    4. Kristel Wouters & Jeroen Maesschalck & Carel Peeters & Marijke Roosen, 2014. "Methodological Issues in the Design of Online Surveys for Measuring Unethical Work Behavior: Recommendations on the Basis of a Split-Ballot Experiment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 275-289, March.
    5. Andrew West, 2016. "Applying Metaethical and Normative Claims of Moral Relativism to (Shareholder and Stakeholder) Models of Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 199-215, May.
    6. Robert Cialdini & Yexin Jessica Li & Adriana Samper & Ned Wellman, 2021. "How Bad Apples Promote Bad Barrels: Unethical Leader Behavior and the Selective Attrition Effect," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 861-880, February.
    7. Maan Hussein Mansour & Hazem Khaled Shehadeh, 2021. "The Impact of Talent Management (TM) on Counterproductive Work Behaviors (CWB) in Industrial Companies in Jordan," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 1-96, July.
    8. Raymond O. S. Zaal & Ronald J. M. Jeurissen & Edward A. G. Groenland, 2019. "Organizational Architecture, Ethical Culture, and Perceived Unethical Behavior Towards Customers: Evidence from Wholesale Banking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 825-848, September.
    9. Mario Fernando & Ruwan Bandara, 2020. "Towards virtuous and ethical organisational performance in the context of corruption: A case study in the public sector," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(3), pages 196-204, August.
    10. Brennan, Linda & Binney, Wayne & McCrohan, Janelle & Lancaster, Narelle, 2011. "Implementation of environmental sustainability in business: Suggestions for improvement," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 52-57.
    11. Aharon Tziner & Erich C. Fein, 2012. "Modeling employees' deviant behavior and employers' reactions: an interdisciplinary approach using principal-agent and prospect theories," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(4), pages 10-20.
    12. Hagen Rafeld & Sebastian G. Fritz-Morgenthal & Peter N. Posch, 2020. "Whale Watching on the Trading Floor: Unravelling Collusive Rogue Trading in Banks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 633-657, September.
    13. Babasanda Florentina & Ciobanu Alina & Oancea Raluca & Tănase Tasențe, 2023. "The relationship between intensity of social media use activity and counterproductive workplace behaviors," BlackSea Journal of Psychology, Ovidius University of Constanta, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 40-57, November.
    14. Liz Wang & Lisa Calvano, 2015. "Is Business Ethics Education Effective? An Analysis of Gender, Personal Ethical Perspectives, and Moral Judgment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(4), pages 591-602, February.
    15. Seraphim Voliotis, 2017. "Establishing the Normative Standards that Determine Deviance in Organizational Corruption: Is Corruption Within Organizations Antisocial or Unethical?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 147-160, January.
    16. Henrike Andersch & Jörg Lindenmeier & Florian Liberatore & Dieter K. Tscheulin, 2018. "Resistance against corporate misconduct: an analysis of ethical ideologies’ direct and moderating effects on different forms of active rebellion," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 88(6), pages 695-730, August.
    17. Dirk De Clercq & Dave Bouckenooghe & Usman Raja & Ganna Matsyborska, 2014. "Unpacking the Goal Congruence–Organizational Deviance Relationship: The Roles of Work Engagement and Emotional Intelligence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(4), pages 695-711, November.
    18. Katri Karjalainen & Katariina Kemppainen & Erik Raaij, 2009. "Non-Compliant Work Behaviour in Purchasing: An Exploration of Reasons Behind Maverick Buying," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 245-261, March.
    19. Fareed Ul Hassan & Syed Abdul Waheed & Nadia Gilani, 2019. "Teachers Perspectives on Headteachers Mistreatment: Exploring the other Side of the Coin," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(4), pages 350-359, December.
    20. Baur, John E. & Bradley, Bret H. & Bonner, Robert L., 2022. "Boiling frogs: Reconsidering the impact of deviance targets, severity, and frequency in teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1026-1037.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2024:i:2:p:53-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.