IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvt/journl/y2026id1227.html

Evolution of innovation management approaches in the R&D of pharmaceutical industry

Author

Listed:
  • K. R. Rakhmanova

  • Ð . Ð . Gorovoy

Abstract

The article examines the evolution of management models in the innovative research and development (R&D) sector of the pharmaceutical industry. The relevance of the research is determined by the need to find effective approaches to overcoming the systemic contradiction in the management of pharmaceutical innovative R&D, where exponential growth of investments is accompanied by a decrease in the return on innovation, while simultaneously solving the tasks set by the Government of the Russian Federation within the framework of the Pharmaceutical Industry Development Strategy of the Russian Federation «Pharma–2030» to achieve technological sovereignty and ensure national security in the field of drug provision. This requires an accelerated transition from an import–dependent model to the creation of a full cycle of development and production of original medicines 2. The paper provides an analysis of the evolution of approaches to managing high–risk innovative pharmaceutical R&D projects. Four main stages in the evolution of management approaches are identified, their key parameters are determined, such as the concept of the management model and their costs, and a consistent transition from rigid linear to flexible digital models of innovation management is revealed. The determinants of the transition from classical linear models to modern models are identified. A key factor in the shift in management paradigms in pharmaceutical R&D is formulated as an increase in transaction costs caused by the need for data integration and adaptation in the context of increasingly complex innovation processes. The practical significance of the study lies in the proposal of criteria for the strategic choice of a management model for pharmaceutical innovative R&D, where the choice should be based on a multi–factor assessment of R&D stages, technological maturity and types of risks, which will allow organizations to minimize transaction costs through the adaptation of management practices.

Suggested Citation

  • K. R. Rakhmanova & Ð . Ð . Gorovoy, 2026. "Evolution of innovation management approaches in the R&D of pharmaceutical industry," Scientific notes of the Russian academy of entrepreneurship, JSC “Publishing Agency “Science and Educationâ€, vol. 25(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:cvt:journl:y:2026:id:1227
    DOI: 10.24182/2073-6258-2026-25-2-73-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scinotes.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1227/951
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24182/2073-6258-2026-25-2-73-83?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DiMasi, Joseph A. & Grabowski, Henry G. & Hansen, Ronald W., 2016. "Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 20-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dosis, Anastasios & Muthoo, Abhinay, 2019. "Experimentation in Dynamic R&D Competition," CRETA Online Discussion Paper Series 52, Centre for Research in Economic Theory and its Applications CRETA.
    2. Yusuke Oh & Koji Takahashi, 2020. "R&D and Innovation: Evidence from Patent Data," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 20-E-7, Bank of Japan.
    3. Gamba, Simona & Magazzini, Laura & Pertile, Paolo, 2021. "R&D and market size: Who benefits from orphan drug legislation?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Branstetter, Lee & Chatterjee, Chirantan & Higgins, Matthew J., 2022. "Generic competition and the incentives for early-stage pharmaceutical innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    5. Unsal, Omer & Houston, Reza, 2024. "R&D grants and medical innovation," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Abe C. Dunn & Lasanthi Fernando & Eli Liebman, 2024. "How Much Are Medical Innovations Worth? A Detailed Analysis Using Cost-Effectiveness Studies," BEA Papers 0132, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    7. Alfred B. Ordman, 2022. "When Will the FDA Do What Is in People’s Best Interests?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(4), pages 721-751, September.
    8. Edouard Debonneuil & Anne Eyraud-Loisel & Frédéric Planchet, 2018. "Can Pension Funds Partially Manage Longevity Risk by Investing in a Longevity Megafund?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Billette de Villemeur, Etienne & Versaevel, Bruno, 2019. "One lab, two firms, many possibilities: On R&D outsourcing in the biopharmaceutical industry," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 260-283.
    10. Yixiang Ruan & Chenyin Lu & Ning Xu & Yuchen He & Yixin Chen & Jian Zhang & Jun Xuan & Jianzhang Pan & Qun Fang & Hanyu Gao & Xiaodong Shen & Ning Ye & Qiang Zhang & Yiming Mo, 2024. "An automatic end-to-end chemical synthesis development platform powered by large language models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Gregor Dorfleitner & Felix Rößle, 2018. "The financial performance of the health care industry: a global, regional and industry specific empirical investigation," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(4), pages 585-594, May.
    12. Farasat A. S. Bokhari & Franco Mariuzzo & Anna Rita Bennato, 2021. "Innovation and growth in the UK pharmaceuticals: the case of product and marketing introductions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 603-634, June.
    13. Stig Johan Wiklund, 2019. "A modelling framework for improved design and decision-making in drug development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Yin, Nina, 2023. "Pharmaceuticals, incremental innovation and market exclusivity," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Rathi, Sawan & Majumdar, Adrija & Chatterjee, Chirantan, 2024. "Did the COVID-19 pandemic propel usage of AI in pharmaceutical innovation? New evidence from patenting data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Heyoung Yang & Hyuck Jai Lee, 2018. "Long-Term Collaboration Network Based on ClinicalTrials.gov Database in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Ramagopalan, Sreeram V & Thaker, Harshal & Walker, Mel & Narasimhan, Om, 2025. "How much do ex-US revenues make a difference for pharmaceutical investment returns?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 129485, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Ralph Siebert & Zhili Tian, 2020. "Dynamic Mergers Effects on R&D Investments and Drug Development across Research Phases in the Pharmaceutical Industry," CESifo Working Paper Series 8303, CESifo.
    19. Stacy Sneeringer & Matt Clancy, 2020. "Incentivizing New Veterinary Pharmaceutical Products to Combat Antibiotic Resistance," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 653-673, December.
    20. Gemma Turon & Jason Hlozek & John G. Woodland & Ankur Kumar & Kelly Chibale & Miquel Duran-Frigola, 2023. "First fully-automated AI/ML virtual screening cascade implemented at a drug discovery centre in Africa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvt:journl:y:2026:id:1227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.