IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuc/eforum/v15y2025i3p41-55.html

Integration of joint consumption mechanisms as a factor in the transformation of housing policy in the reconstruction period

Author

Listed:
  • Serhii Bobko
  • Oleksandr Hutsaliuk
  • Maksym Koliada

Abstract

The post-war reconstruction of the housing stock required the search for innovative approaches to providing the population with affordable housing through alternative consumption models. The study aimed to substantiate the possibilities of integrating global practices of collective housing consumption into post-war development strategies. The study was based on a comparative analysis of international cases, systematisation of theoretical foundations and development of conceptual models of adaptation. The main types of collaborative housing business models were classified, and their regional peculiarities of functioning in Germany, France, Denmark, Sweden (Europe), the USA and Canada (North America) and China (Asia) were identified. The theoretical analysis shown that the least regulated Asian markets shown the highest returns of up to 30%, while the tightly controlled European markets demonstrated 12-15% profitability. A review of Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian collective housing projects presented the potential to reduce household expenses by up to 45% and cut social spending by a fifth. A systematic analysis of Ukrainian market trends in 2020-2024 indicated a nearly 70% increase in housing construction, which created favourable conditions for diversifying housing supply models. Key groups of potential consumers of new housing services were identified, including a third of a million internally displaced persons in Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk and Zakarpattia regions. Recommendations for creating regulatory sandboxes within the framework of the Diia City initiatives and launching municipal programmes to support social entrepreneurship in the housing sector were developed. The readiness of the Ukrainian digital infrastructure for the functioning of residential sharing platforms was determined, incorporating the high level of digitalisation of the population. A multi-component system for adapting foreign experience to national cultural, economic and legal conditions was developed. The practical results can be used by local authorities to develop effective housing innovation programmes and create a favourable environment for the operation of collective consumption platforms

Suggested Citation

  • Serhii Bobko & Oleksandr Hutsaliuk & Maksym Koliada, 2025. "Integration of joint consumption mechanisms as a factor in the transformation of housing policy in the reconstruction period," E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 15(3), pages 41-55, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:41-55
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/3.2025.41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-forum.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/EF_15_3_2025_41-55.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/3.2025.41?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Alyakoob & Mohammad S. Rahman, 2022. "Shared Prosperity (or Lack Thereof) in the Sharing Economy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 638-658, June.
    2. Mujtaba Ahsan, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Ethics in the Sharing Economy: A Critical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 19-33, January.
    3. Yanbo Qu & Xiaozhen Dong & Lingyun Zhan & Hongyun Si & Zongli Ping & Weiya Zhu, 2021. "Scale Transition and Structure–Function Synergy Differentiation of Rural Residential Land: A Dimensionality Reduction Transmission Process from Macro to Micro Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Noel Brings Jacobsen, 2006. "Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 10(1‐2), pages 239-255, January.
    5. Apostolos Filippas & John J. Horton & Richard J. Zeckhauser, 2020. "Owning, Using, and Renting: Some Simple Economics of the “Sharing Economy”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 4152-4172, September.
    6. Hui Li & Yijin Kim & Kannan Srinivasan, 2022. "Market Shifts in the Sharing Economy: The Impact of Airbnb on Housing Rentals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8015-8044, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shagun Tripathi & Georgios Petropoulos & Harris Kyriakou, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of Algorithmic Quantity Regulations on Sharing Platforms: Evidence from Airbnb in Paris," CESifo Working Paper Series 11811, CESifo.
    2. Rong, Ke & Sun, Hui & Li, Dun & Zhou, Di, 2021. "Matching as Service Provision of Sharing Economy Platforms: An Information Processing Perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Syed Tariq Anwar, 2023. "The sharing economy and collaborative consumption: Strategic issues and global entrepreneurial opportunities," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 60-88, March.
    4. David M. Harrison & Michael J. Seiler & Liuming Yang, 2024. "The Impact of iBuyers on Housing Market Dynamics," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 425-461, April.
    5. Héctor Leiva & Ignacio Julian & Lucía Ventura & Elin Wallin & Marcus Vendt & Rickard Fornell & Francisca Galindo Paniagua & Sonia Ascaso & Manuel Gomez-Perez, 2025. "Advancing Sustainability Through Industrial Symbiosis: A Technoeconomic Approach Using Material Flow Cost Accounting and Cost–Benefit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-31, March.
    6. Colton Brehm & Astrid Layton, 2021. "Nestedness of eco‐industrial networks: Exploring linkage distribution to promote sustainable industrial growth," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 205-218, February.
    7. Nasir, Mohammed Haneef Abdul & Genovese, Andrea & Acquaye, Adolf A. & Koh, S.C.L. & Yamoah, Fred, 2017. "Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 443-457.
    8. World Bank, 2021. "Circular Economy in Industrial Parks," World Bank Publications - Reports 35419, The World Bank Group.
    9. Buket Erzen & Şermin Deni̇z & Ercan Aydoğmuş & Filiz Kar & Hasan Arslanoğlu, 2026. "Integrating Life Cycle Thinking and Extended Producer Responsibility into Industrial Symbiosis: A Review of Circular Economy Approaches," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-59, April.
    10. Qili Wang & Liangfei Qiu & Wei Xu, 2024. "Informal Payments and Doctor Engagement in an Online Health Community: An Empirical Investigation Using Generalized Synthetic Control," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 706-726, June.
    11. Mikko Hänninen & Anssi Smedlund, 2021. "Same Old Song with a Different Melody: The Paradox of Market Reach and Financial Performance on Digital Platforms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1832-1868, November.
    12. Duncan, Denvil & Ross, Justin, 2025. "The effect of Airbnb on housing prices: Evidence from the 2017 solar eclipse," ZEW Discussion Papers 25-027, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Rosario Silva & Oksana Gerwe, 2024. "Micro Entry Theory: Understanding the Drivers and Effects of the Entry of Micro Players in the Context of Digital Platforms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(6), pages 2633-2661, September.
    14. Gerardo A. Perez-Valdes & Vibeke S. Nørstebø & May-Britt Ellingsen & Jukka Teräs & Adrian T. Werner, 2019. "Bioeconomic Clusters—Background, Emergence, Localization and Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Sun, Lu & Li, Hong & Dong, Liang & Fang, Kai & Ren, Jingzheng & Geng, Yong & Fujii, Minoru & Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Ning & Liu, Zhe, 2017. "Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and emergy evaluation approach: A case of Liuzhou city, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 78-88.
    16. Hu, Xu & Yang, Zhaojun & Sun, Jun & Zhang, Yali, 2021. "Sharing economy of electric vehicle private charge posts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 258-275.
    17. Cristiano Codagnone & Federico Biagi & Fabienne Abadie, 2016. "The Passions and the Interests: Unpacking the ‘Sharing Economy’," JRC Research Reports JRC101279, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Shangkun Yu & Yi Miao & Mengcheng Li & Xiaoming Ding & Chengxin Wang & Wangsheng Dou, 2022. "Theoretical Development Model for Rural Settlements against Rural Shrinkage: An Empirical Study on Pingyin County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Yao, Qiongrui (Missy) & Baker, LaKami T. & Lohrke, Franz T., 2022. "Building and sustaining trust in remote work by platform-dependent entrepreneurs on digital labor platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 327-339.
    20. Usón, Sergio & Valero, Antonio & Agudelo, Andrés, 2012. "Thermoeconomics and Industrial Symbiosis. Effect of by-product integration in cost assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 43-51.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:41-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.