IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuc/eforum/v15y2025i3p41-55.html

Integration of joint consumption mechanisms as a factor in the transformation of housing policy in the reconstruction period

Author

Listed:
  • Serhii Bobko
  • Oleksandr Hutsaliuk
  • Maksym Koliada

Abstract

The post-war reconstruction of the housing stock required the search for innovative approaches to providing the population with affordable housing through alternative consumption models. The study aimed to substantiate the possibilities of integrating global practices of collective housing consumption into post-war development strategies. The study was based on a comparative analysis of international cases, systematisation of theoretical foundations and development of conceptual models of adaptation. The main types of collaborative housing business models were classified, and their regional peculiarities of functioning in Germany, France, Denmark, Sweden (Europe), the USA and Canada (North America) and China (Asia) were identified. The theoretical analysis shown that the least regulated Asian markets shown the highest returns of up to 30%, while the tightly controlled European markets demonstrated 12-15% profitability. A review of Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian collective housing projects presented the potential to reduce household expenses by up to 45% and cut social spending by a fifth. A systematic analysis of Ukrainian market trends in 2020-2024 indicated a nearly 70% increase in housing construction, which created favourable conditions for diversifying housing supply models. Key groups of potential consumers of new housing services were identified, including a third of a million internally displaced persons in Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk and Zakarpattia regions. Recommendations for creating regulatory sandboxes within the framework of the Diia City initiatives and launching municipal programmes to support social entrepreneurship in the housing sector were developed. The readiness of the Ukrainian digital infrastructure for the functioning of residential sharing platforms was determined, incorporating the high level of digitalisation of the population. A multi-component system for adapting foreign experience to national cultural, economic and legal conditions was developed. The practical results can be used by local authorities to develop effective housing innovation programmes and create a favourable environment for the operation of collective consumption platforms

Suggested Citation

  • Serhii Bobko & Oleksandr Hutsaliuk & Maksym Koliada, 2025. "Integration of joint consumption mechanisms as a factor in the transformation of housing policy in the reconstruction period," E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 15(3), pages 41-55, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:41-55
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/3.2025.41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-forum.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/EF_15_3_2025_41-55.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/3.2025.41?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noel Brings Jacobsen, 2006. "Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 10(1‐2), pages 239-255, January.
    2. Mohammed Alyakoob & Mohammad S. Rahman, 2022. "Shared Prosperity (or Lack Thereof) in the Sharing Economy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 638-658, June.
    3. Mujtaba Ahsan, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Ethics in the Sharing Economy: A Critical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 19-33, January.
    4. Yanbo Qu & Xiaozhen Dong & Lingyun Zhan & Hongyun Si & Zongli Ping & Weiya Zhu, 2021. "Scale Transition and Structure–Function Synergy Differentiation of Rural Residential Land: A Dimensionality Reduction Transmission Process from Macro to Micro Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Hui Li & Yijin Kim & Kannan Srinivasan, 2022. "Market Shifts in the Sharing Economy: The Impact of Airbnb on Housing Rentals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8015-8044, November.
    6. Apostolos Filippas & John J. Horton & Richard J. Zeckhauser, 2020. "Owning, Using, and Renting: Some Simple Economics of the “Sharing Economy”," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 4152-4172, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shagun Tripathi & Georgios Petropoulos & Harris Kyriakou, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of Algorithmic Quantity Regulations on Sharing Platforms: Evidence from Airbnb in Paris," CESifo Working Paper Series 11811, CESifo.
    2. Syed Tariq Anwar, 2023. "The sharing economy and collaborative consumption: Strategic issues and global entrepreneurial opportunities," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 60-88, March.
    3. Rong, Ke & Sun, Hui & Li, Dun & Zhou, Di, 2021. "Matching as Service Provision of Sharing Economy Platforms: An Information Processing Perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. David M. Harrison & Michael J. Seiler & Liuming Yang, 2024. "The Impact of iBuyers on Housing Market Dynamics," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 425-461, April.
    5. Greg Buchak, 2024. "Financing the Gig Economy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(1), pages 219-256, February.
    6. Fangchen Song & Ashish Agarwal & Wen Wen, 2024. "The Impact of Generative AI on Collaborative Open-Source Software Development: Evidence from GitHub Copilot," Papers 2410.02091, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    7. Héctor Leiva & Ignacio Julian & Lucía Ventura & Elin Wallin & Marcus Vendt & Rickard Fornell & Francisca Galindo Paniagua & Sonia Ascaso & Manuel Gomez-Perez, 2025. "Advancing Sustainability Through Industrial Symbiosis: A Technoeconomic Approach Using Material Flow Cost Accounting and Cost–Benefit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-31, March.
    8. Colton Brehm & Astrid Layton, 2021. "Nestedness of eco‐industrial networks: Exploring linkage distribution to promote sustainable industrial growth," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 205-218, February.
    9. Gutberlet, Melissa & Preuss, Lutz & Thorpe, Andrea Stevenson, 2023. "Macro level matters: Advancing circular economy in different business systems within Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    10. Nasir, Mohammed Haneef Abdul & Genovese, Andrea & Acquaye, Adolf A. & Koh, S.C.L. & Yamoah, Fred, 2017. "Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 443-457.
    11. Harshini Mallawaarachchi & Gayani Karunasena & Yasangika Sandanayake & Chunlu Liu, 2023. "Conceptualising a Model to Assess the Optimum Water Flow of Industrial Symbiosis (IS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Christopher Großmann & Katrin Merfeld & Jan Klein & Franziska Föller & Sven Henkel, 2024. "Onto the light side of sharing: Using the force of blockchain," Post-Print hal-04548636, HAL.
    13. Pingyu Jiang & Pulin Li, 2019. "Shared factory: a new production node for social manufacturing in the context of sharing economy," Papers 1904.11377, arXiv.org.
    14. Julene Paul, 2026. "A wider view of shared transportation: Assessing the socioemotional costs and benefits of sharing in and sharing out," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 63(4), pages 621-640, March.
    15. Yao Cui & Andrew M. Davis, 2022. "Tax-Induced Inequalities in the Sharing Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7202-7220, October.
    16. Zhang, Hui & Dong, Liang & Li, Huiquan & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Ohnishi, Satoshi & Tang, Qing, 2013. "Analysis of low-carbon industrial symbiosis technology for carbon mitigation in a Chinese iron/steel industrial park: A case study with carbon flow analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1400-1411.
    17. Hidalgo, Alberto, 2024. "Your room is ready: Tourism and urban revival," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. World Bank, 2021. "Circular Economy in Industrial Parks," World Bank Publications - Reports 35419, The World Bank Group.
    19. Jing Wang & Qian Gao & Rui Zhang, 2025. "Gig economy and its impact on individual employment: an empirical analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Jianqing Chen & Nan Feng & Zhiling Guo & Wenyi Zhang, 2025. "On-Demand, Long-Term, or Hybrid? An Economic Analysis of Optimal Rental Models on Sharing Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 307-325, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:41-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.