IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2730-d1615810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing Sustainability Through Industrial Symbiosis: A Technoeconomic Approach Using Material Flow Cost Accounting and Cost–Benefit Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Héctor Leiva

    (CIRCE—Technology Center for Energy Resources and Consumption, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Ignacio Julian

    (CIRCE—Technology Center for Energy Resources and Consumption, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Lucía Ventura

    (CIRCE—Technology Center for Energy Resources and Consumption, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Elin Wallin

    (RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, SE-412 58 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Marcus Vendt

    (RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, SE-412 58 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Rickard Fornell

    (RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, SE-412 58 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Francisca Galindo Paniagua

    (Grupo Fertiberia, 28036 Madrid, Spain)

  • Sonia Ascaso

    (Research Institute for Energy and Resource Efficiency of Aragón (ENERGAIA), University of Zaragoza, Campus Río Ebro, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Manuel Gomez-Perez

    (CEMEX, 28027 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Industrial symbiosis (IS) involves transferring waste materials and/or energy flows between stakeholders to enhance resource efficiency and reduce environmental impacts. The success of these transactions depends on supply–demand matching, technical feasibility of waste integration into industrial processes, economic savings, and compliance with legal and environmental regulations. This paper presents a methodology for the technoeconomic assessment of IS projects, integrating material flow cost accounting (MFCA) and cost–benefit analysis (CBA) incorporating CAPEX and OPEX considerations. MFCA, traditionally used to identify hidden costs from inefficiencies, is adapted here to assess resource utilisation across industry networks. The methodology is applied to two real-world demo cases: a novel fertiliser production process in Escombreras (Spain), where IS focuses on process optimisation and by-product valorisation, and an IS process design in Frövi (Sweden), where CO 2 and residual energy flows are exchanged between industrial sectors. The results demonstrate the potential of MFCA-CBA integration to enhance decision making in IS implementation. In Spain, process optimisation led to a 50% reduction in operating costs, whereas, in Sweden, CO 2 reutilisation resulted in a 30% increase in resource efficiency. These findings highlight the economic and environmental benefits of IS and provide insights into cost allocation and pricing strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Héctor Leiva & Ignacio Julian & Lucía Ventura & Elin Wallin & Marcus Vendt & Rickard Fornell & Francisca Galindo Paniagua & Sonia Ascaso & Manuel Gomez-Perez, 2025. "Advancing Sustainability Through Industrial Symbiosis: A Technoeconomic Approach Using Material Flow Cost Accounting and Cost–Benefit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-31, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2730-:d:1615810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2730/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2730/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christ, Katherine L. & Burritt, Roger L., 2016. "ISO 14051: A new era for MFCA implementation and research," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-9.
    2. Lin Shi & Marian Chertow, 2017. "Organizational Boundary Change in Industrial Symbiosis: Revisiting the Guitang Group in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Vera Amicarelli & Brian E. Roe & Christian Bux, 2022. "Measuring Food Loss and Waste Costs in the Italian Potato Chip Industry Using Material Flow Cost Accounting," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Reinhilde Veugelers & Simone Tagliapietra & Cecilia Trasi, 2024. "Green Industrial Policy in Europe: Past, Present, and Prospects," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Anna Lütje & Sinéad Leber & Jonas Scholten & Volker Wohlgemuth, 2021. "Web Tool for the Identification of Industrial Symbioses in Industrial Parks," Progress in IS, in: Andreas Kamilaris & Volker Wohlgemuth & Kostas Karatzas & Ioannis N. Athanasiadis (ed.), Advances and New Trends in Environmental Informatics, pages 19-34, Springer.
    6. Noel Brings Jacobsen, 2006. "Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 10(1‐2), pages 239-255, January.
    7. Caitlin Walls & Almy Ruzni Keumala Putri & Gesa Beck, 2023. "Material Flow Cost Accounting as a Resource-Saving Tool for Emerging Recycling Technologies," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Laura Montag, 2023. "Roadmap to a Circular Economy by 2030: A Comparative Review of Circular Business Model Visions in Germany and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-31, March.
    9. Zeng, Huixiang & Zhou, Zhifang & Xiao, Xu, 2021. "MFCA extension from a life cycle perspective: Methodical refinements and use case," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Mattia Cottes & Matia Mainardis & Patrizia Simeoni, 2023. "Assessing the Techno-Economic Feasibility of Waste Electric and Electronic Equipment Treatment Plant: A Multi-Decisional Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Shaio Yan Huang & An An Chiu & Po Chi Chao & Ni Wang, 2019. "The Application of Material Flow Cost Accounting in Waste Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-27, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jui-Che Tu & Hsieh-Shan Huang, 2019. "Relationship between Green Design and Material Flow Cost Accounting in the Context of Effective Resource Utilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Hua Cui & Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté & Weifeng Liu, 2018. "Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis with a System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Hai Hua Industrial Symbiosis, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    3. John Rincón-Moreno & Marta Ormazabal & Maria J. Álvarez & Carmen Jaca, 2020. "Shortcomings of Transforming a Local Circular Economy System through Industrial Symbiosis: A Case Study in Spanish SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Juan Henriques & Paulo Ferrão & Rui Castro & João Azevedo, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis: A Sectoral Analysis on Enablers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Colton Brehm & Astrid Layton, 2021. "Nestedness of eco‐industrial networks: Exploring linkage distribution to promote sustainable industrial growth," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 205-218, February.
    6. World Bank, 2021. "Circular Economy in Industrial Parks," World Bank Publications - Reports 35419, The World Bank Group.
    7. Sun, Lu & Li, Hong & Dong, Liang & Fang, Kai & Ren, Jingzheng & Geng, Yong & Fujii, Minoru & Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Ning & Liu, Zhe, 2017. "Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and emergy evaluation approach: A case of Liuzhou city, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 78-88.
    8. Gilles Paché, 2024. "Kalundborg Industrial Symbiosis: Circular Strategy in the Light of Mutualism," Post-Print hal-04870887, HAL.
    9. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & João C. O. Matias, 2019. "Current Status, Emerging Challenges, and Future Prospects of Industrial Symbiosis in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Chembessi Chedrak & Gohoungodji Paulin & Juste Rajaonson, 2023. "“A fine wine, better with age”: Circular economy historical roots and influential publications: A bibliometric analysis using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1593-1612, December.
    11. Peng Chen & Zaijun Li & Meijuan Hu, 2025. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution Pattern and Driving Forces of Carbon Lock-In in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Rodrigo Lozano, 2020. "Analysing the use of tools, initiatives, and approaches to promote sustainability in corporations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 982-998, March.
    13. Heshmati, Almas, 2015. "A Review of the Circular Economy and its Implementation," IZA Discussion Papers 9611, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Algers, Jonas & Gong, Jindan & Nykvist, Björn & Åhman, Max, 2025. "Competition and climate policy in the steel transition: Comparing costs and subsidies in the US and the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Frank Figge & Andrea Stevenson Thorpe & Siarhei Manzhynski & Melissa Gutberlet, 2022. "The us in reUSe. Theorizing the how and why of the circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2741-2753, September.
    16. Jarmo Uusikartano & Hannele Väyrynen & Leena Aarikka-Stenroos, 2020. "Public Agency in Changing Industrial Circular Economy Ecosystems: Roles, Modes and Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Romana Fernando Acabado, 2020. "Impact Assessment on the Economic and Financial Indicators of the Implementation of Lean Management Model," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 49-69, December.
    18. Magdalena Zabek & Pauline Jegen & Lillith Kreiss, 2024. "Introducing a Novel Concept for an Integrated Demolition Waste Recycling Center and the Establishment of a Stakeholder Network: A Case Study from Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Dario Guarascio & Jelena Reljic & Francesco Zezza, 2025. "Energy vulnerability and resilience in the EU: concepts, empirics and policy," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 52(3), pages 683-726, September.
    20. Olimpia Fontana & Simone Vannuccini, 2024. "How to Institutionalise European Industrial Policy (for Strategic Autonomy and the Green Transition)," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-30, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2730-:d:1615810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.