IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/020632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The portuguese public procurement system as a strategic instrument of public management

Author

Listed:
  • Romao, Ana Lúcia da Silva

    (Universidade de Lisboa)

  • Ferreira, Ana Paula Ventura

    (Universidade de Lisboa)

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the National Public Procurement System (NPPS) as a strategic instrument of public management, in Portugal. The creation of NPPS, in 2007, followed the European Union model for public procurement, based on criteria of economy, efficiency, and effectiveness that leads to greater transparency and accountability and reflects public value. This experiment analysis which are the weakest and the strongest dimensions of the NPPS and to what extent does the performance of the NPPS fit as a strategic instrument of public management. A research survey, based on the conceptual model developed by Essig et al.(2010)and laterapplied by Thi et al.(2012), adapted to Portuguese context, was applied to 1,500 entities linked to the NPPS. The sample size of 101 valid questionnaires corresponds to an effective response rate of 5.6%. The data analysis used exploratory factor analysis to validate the distribution of the variables and performed a principal component analysis with varimax rotation. The research concluded that NPPS has, in general, a low level of performance, despite the positive contribution of the “Information and control” and “Electronic platforms” factors in process management. These results corroborate the need for a realignment of the public procurement strategy in Portugal. **************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** Esta investigación tiene como objetivo evaluar el Sistema Nacional de Contratación Pública (NPPS) como un instrumento estratégico de gestión pública, en Portugal. La creación de NPPS, en 2007, siguió el modelo de la Unión Europea para la contratación pública, basado en criterios de economía, eficiencia y eficacia que conduce a una mayor transparencia y rendición de cuentas y refleja el valor público. Este experimento analiza cuáles son las dimensiones más débiles y más fuertes de la NPPS y en qué medida encaja el desempeno de la NPPS como un instrumento estratégico de la gestión pública. Una encuesta de investigación, basada en el modelo conceptual desarrollado por Essig et al. (2010) y posteriormente aplicado por Thi et al. (2012), adaptado al contexto portugués, se aplicó a 1.500 entidades vinculadas al NPPS. El tamano de la muestra de 101 cuestionarios válidos corresponde a una tasa de respuesta efectiva del 5,6%. El análisis de datos utilizó análisis factorial exploratorio para validar la distribución de las variables y realizó un análisis de componentes principales con rotación varimax. La investigación concluyó que NPPS tiene, en general, un bajo nivel de desempeno, a pesar de la contribución positiva de los factores “Información y control” y “Plataformas electrónicas” en la gestión de procesos. Estos resultados corroboran la necesidad de un realineamiento de la estrategia de contratación pública en Portugal.

Suggested Citation

  • Romao, Ana Lúcia da Silva & Ferreira, Ana Paula Ventura, 2023. "The portuguese public procurement system as a strategic instrument of public management," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 24(1), pages 198-225, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:020632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rtend/article/view/7917
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edler, Jakob & Georghiou, Luke, 2007. "Public procurement and innovation--Resurrecting the demand side," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 949-963, September.
    2. Hans Knutsson & Anna Thomasson, 2014. "Innovation in the Public Procurement Process: A study of the creation of innovation-friendly public procurement," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 242-255, February.
    3. Gian Luigi Albano & Marco Sparro, 2010. "Flexible Strategies for Centralized Public Procurement," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 1(2).
    4. Christine Harland & Jan Telgen & Guy Callender & Rick Grimm & Andrea Patrucco, 2019. "Implementing Government Policy in Supply Chains: An International Coproduction Study of Public Procurement," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(2), pages 6-25, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Askfors, Ylva & Fornstedt, Helena, 2018. "The clash of managerial and professional logics in public procurement: Implications for innovation in the health-care sector," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 78-90.
    2. Paula Cayolla Trindade & Paula Antunes & Paulo Partidário, 2017. "SPP Toolbox: Supporting Sustainable Public Procurement in the Context of Socio-Technical Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Miller, Fiona A. & Lehoux, Pascale, 2020. "The innovation impacts of public procurement offices: The case of healthcare procurement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    4. Bleda, Mercedes & Chicot, Julien, 2020. "The role of public procurement in the formation of markets for innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 186-196.
    5. Uyarra, Elvira & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Flanagan, Kieron & Magro, Edurne, 2020. "Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    6. van Winden, Willem & Carvalho, Luís, 2019. "Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    7. Massimo FLORIO & Francesco GIFFONI, 2019. "L’impatto sociale della produzione di scienza su larga scala: come governarlo?," Departmental Working Papers 2019-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    8. Obwegeser, Nikolaus & Müller, Sune Dueholm, 2018. "Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 1-17.
    9. Daria Crisan, 2020. "Buying With Intent: Public Procurement for Innovation by Provincial and Municipal Governments," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 13(18), July.
    10. Strömbäck, Elon, 2015. "Policy by Public Procurement: Opportunities and Pitfalls," Umeå Economic Studies 915, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    11. Edquist, Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel, 2020. "Functional procurement for innovation, welfare and the environment," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research, revised 19 Jul 2020.
    12. Edquist , Charles, 2015. "Innovation-related Public Procurement as a Demand-oriented Innovation Policy Instrument," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/28, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    13. Elvira Uyarra & Kieron Flanagan & Edurne Magro & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2017. "Anchoring the innovation impacts of public procurement to place: The role of conversations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 828-848, August.
    14. Bernard Hoekman & Bedri Kamil Onur Taş, 2022. "Procurement policy and SME participation in public purchasing," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 383-402, January.
    15. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply [Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge base," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    16. Georghiou, Luke & Edler, Jakob & Uyarra, Elvira & Yeow, Jillian, 2014. "Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-12.
    17. David E. Cantor & Tingting Yan & Mark Pagell & Wendy L. Tate, 2022. "From the editors: Introduction to the emerging discourse incubator on the topic of leveraging multiple types of resources within the supply network for competitive advantage," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 3-7, April.
    18. Zeeshan Noor Siddiqui, 2017. "Understanding the Linkage among Public Procurement (PP), Corruption, and Tax Morale (TM) Through Agency Theory (AT): A Review," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(3), pages 258-288, September.
    19. Ghisetti, Claudia, 2017. "Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 178-187.
    20. Zahler, Andrés & Goya, Daniel & Caamaño, Matías, 2022. "The primacy of demand and financial obstacles in hindering innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    administrative sciences; factor analysis; Portugal; public administration; publicsector;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • K12 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Contract Law
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:020632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.