IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/018686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prácticas de gestión del conocimiento en organizaciones del tercer sector (ongs): caso de estudio

Author

Listed:
  • Castro, Adriana Aguilera

    (Universidad del Valle)

  • Castillo, Vanessa Asprilla

    (Universidad del Valle)

Abstract

El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo verificar empíricamente las prácticas de gestión del conocimiento en una organización del tercer sector (ONG). Las Organizaciones no gubernamentales son cada vez más importantes, ya que logran suplir necesidades sociales insatisfechas; por tanto, el estudio de sus prácticas de gestión del conocimiento, es significativo para el apoyo al mejoramiento de su gestión. Este artículo aborda un estudio de caso; el enfoque de investigación es cualitativo, de tipo descriptivo y para la recolección de información se aplicaron entrevistas semi – estructuradas. El caso de estudio es la Fundación Carlos Portela, una organización reconocida en el Valle del Cauca (Colombia), por su labor de apoyo a los ninos con cáncer y sus familias. Los resultados obtenidos en el estudio evidencian que la Fundación Carlos Portela desarrolla prácticas de adquisición, socialización, almacenamiento, distribución y uso del conocimiento, que en su mayoría, carecen de una estructura formalmente establecida. Esta situación se puede explicar principalmente porque no existe claridad de lo que significa gestionar el conocimiento y de los beneficios, oportunidades y potencialidades que representa esta actividad para el desarrollo de las organizaciones.

Suggested Citation

  • Castro, Adriana Aguilera & Castillo, Vanessa Asprilla, 2019. "Prácticas de gestión del conocimiento en organizaciones del tercer sector (ongs): caso de estudio," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 20(2), pages 49-68, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:018686
    DOI: 10.22267/rtend.192002.122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.192002.122
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22267/rtend.192002.122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunnar Hedlund, 1994. "A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S2), pages 73-90, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Abdullatif Almulla & Mahdi Mohammed Alamri, 2021. "Using Conceptual Mapping for Learning to Affect Students’ Motivation and Academic Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Karin Andrea Wigger & Dean A. Shepherd, 2020. "We’re All in the Same Boat: A Collective Model of Preserving and Accessing Nature-Based Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(3), pages 587-617, May.
    3. Noorderhaven, N.G. & Koen, C.I. & Beugelsdijk, S., 2002. "Organizational Culture and Network Embeddedness," Discussion Paper 2002-91, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    4. Biron, Michal & Hanuka, Hagar, 2015. "Comparing normative influences as determinants of knowledge continuity," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 655-661.
    5. Santanu Roy & Jay Mitra, 2015. "Strategic Capabilities for Public Sector-led Innovation: Managing Knowledge Worker Deployment at and Quality Performance of Public R&D Laboratories in India," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 1(2), pages 181-200, July.
    6. Huang, Ming-Chang & Chiu, Ya-Ping, 2020. "A knowledge tension perspective on management control and performance in international joint ventures," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4).
    7. Paul Almeida & Jaeyong Song & Robert M. Grant, 2002. "Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 147-161, April.
    8. Shaker A. Zahra & Anders P. Nielsen & William C. Bogner, 1999. "Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, and Competence Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(3), pages 169-189, April.
    9. Teresa da Silva Lopes & Mark Casson & Geoffrey Jones, 2019. "Organizational innovation in the multinational enterprise: Internalization theory and business history," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1338-1358, October.
    10. Esther Tippmann & Pamela Sharkey Scott & Vincent Mangematin, 2014. "Subsidiary managers’ knowledge mobilizations: Unpacking emergent knowledge flows," Post-Print hal-00864324, HAL.
    11. Samir Marwan Hammami & Faisal Ahmed & Jestin Johny & Mohammed Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman, 2021. "Impact of Knowledge Capabilities on Organisational Performance in the Private Sector in Oman: An SEM Approach Using Path Analysis," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Li, Lixu & Ye, Fei & Zhan, Yuanzhu & Kumar, Ajay & Schiavone, Francesco & Li, Yina, 2022. "Unraveling the performance puzzle of digitalization: Evidence from manufacturing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 54-64.
    13. Rahmad Sukor Ab. Samad & Mohamed Iskandar Rahmad Sukor & Darwyan Syah & Eneng Muslihah, 2014. "Understanding the Implementation of Knowledge Management in High-Performance Schools in Malaysia," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.
    14. Mounir Kehal & Zuopeng (Justin) Zhang, 2020. "Knowledge Management Via AUTomated Organizational CARTography (AUTOCART)," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(1), pages 239-255, March.
    15. Guo, Jingjing & Guo, Bin & Zhou, Jianghua & Wu, Xiaobo, 2020. "How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attributes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Cuixia Zhang & Yaliu Yang & Conghu Liu, 2022. "Knowledge Management-Based Mental Health Service Model: Sustainable Application during College Students’ Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Guofeng Shi & Zhiyun Ma & Jiao Feng & Fujin Zhu & Xu Bai & Bingxiu Gui, 2020. "The impact of knowledge transfer performance on the artificial intelligence industry innovation network: An empirical study of Chinese firms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, May.
    18. René Belderbos & Boris Lokshin & Federico Michiel, 2021. "R&D and Foreign Subsidiary Performance at or Below the Technology Frontier," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 745-767, December.
    19. Yong Suhk Pak & Jong Min Lee, 2023. "Organizational learning platforms for knowledge creation in international joint ventures: the mediating role of formal and informal communication," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 2135-2163, November.
    20. Lo, Fang-Yi & Bui, Quang-Tuan & Huarng, Kun-Huang, 2023. "The pace of international expansion for digital multinational enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gestión del conocimiento; ONGs; estudio de caso; organizaciones; tercer sector;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:018686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.