IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/018564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Análisis de la competitividad de las exportaciones del café del Huila

Author

Listed:
  • Losada, Oscar Hernán Cerquera

    (Universidad Surcolombiana)

  • Gómez, Víctor Hugo Pérez

    (Cámara de Comercio de Neiva sede Garzón)

  • Chavarro, Jakeline Sierra

    (SENA Regional Huila)

Abstract

El café ha logrado consolidarse como uno de los productos más importantes del departamento del Huila, siendo reconocido como el principal productor de Café en Colombia, tanto así, que es un producto priorizado en la Apuesta Agroindustrial de la Agenda Interna de Productividad y Competitividad del Huila. Por lo anterior, analizar el estado actual de la competitividad exportadora de dicho producto es relevante no solo para el sector agroindustrial del Huila sino también de todo el país. Por tal razón, el propósito de este trabajo es determinar el nivel de competitividad del café del Huila, a través del índice de ventaja comparativa revelada y estudiar sus determinantes mediante la estimación de un modelo de regresión múltiple. Los análisis de los indicadores mostraron que el Huila tiene una gran ventaja en la exportación de café; y que los países con los que presenta mayor complementariedad comercial son Estados Unidos y los países de la Unión Europea. Los principales determinantes de la competitividad son el tipo de cambio del dólar, mientras que el producto interno bruto, el precio del café y la tasa de desempleo, se relacionan negativamente con la competitividad exportadora del café del Huila.

Suggested Citation

  • Losada, Oscar Hernán Cerquera & Gómez, Víctor Hugo Pérez & Chavarro, Jakeline Sierra, 2020. "Análisis de la competitividad de las exportaciones del café del Huila," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 21(2), pages 19-44, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:018564
    DOI: 10.22267/rtend.202102.139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.202102.139
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22267/rtend.202102.139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oscar Hernán Cerquera Losada & José Jardani Giraldo Uribe & Guillermo León Córdoba Nieto, 2017. "Ventaja comparativa revelada de los fertilizantes fosfatados del Departamento del Huila," Economia y Sociedad., Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Facultad de Economia, issue 37, pages 51-74, Julio-Dic.
    2. Scott, Linda & Vollrath, Thomas, 1992. "Global Competitive Advantages and Overall Bilateral Complementarity in Agriculture," Statistical Bulletin 154792, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fock, Achim & von Ledebur, Oliver, 1998. "Struktur und Potentiale des Agraraußenhandels Mittel- und Osteuropas," IAMO Discussion Papers 14, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    2. Narayan, Seema & Bhattacharya, Poulomi, 2019. "Relative export competitiveness of agricultural commodities and its determinants: Some evidence from India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-47.
    3. M. Bavorová, 2003. "Influence of policy measures on the competitiveness of the sugar industry in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(6), pages 266-274.
    4. Glauben, Thomas & Hanf, Jon H. & Kopsidis, Michael & Pieniadz, Agata & Reinsberg, Klaus (ed.), 2008. "Agri-food business: global challenges - innovative solutions," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 46, number 92317.
    5. Fock, Achim & Ledebur, Oliver von, 1998. "Struktur Und Potentiale Des Agraraussenhandels Mittel- Und Osteuropas," IAMO Discussion Papers 14914, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    6. Waqar Akhtar & M. Sharif & Hassnain Shah, 2009. "Competitiveness of Pakistani Fruits in the World Market," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 125-133, Jul-Dec.
    7. Levkovych, Inna & Hockmann, Heinrich, 2007. "Transition and foreign trade: the case of the Ukrainian agri-food sector," 104th Seminar, September 5-8, 2007, Budapest, Hungary 7781, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Lakner, Zoltan & Husti, Istvan, 2008. "The Necessity Of Strategic Thinking In Hungarian Agribusiness," Bulletin of the Szent Istvan University 47551, Szent Istvan University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences.
    9. Weindlmaier, H., 2000. "Die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der deutschen Ernährungsindustrie: Methodische Ansatzpunkte zur Messung und empirische Ergebnisse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 36.
    10. Norashida Othman & Zulkornain Yusop & Mohd Mansor Ismail & Syamsul Herman Mohammad Afandi, 2021. "Energy Tax and the Downstream Palm Oil Trade Competitiveness Nexus in Malaysia: An Application of GMM Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 593-599.
    11. Gordeev, Roman, 2020. "Comparative advantages of Russian forest products on the global market," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    12. Frohberg, Klaus & Hartmann, Monika, 1997. "Comparing measures of competitiveness," IAMO Discussion Papers 2, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    13. Mashabela, T.E. & Vink, Nick, 2008. "Competitive performance of global deciduous fruit supply chains: South Africa versus Chile," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 47(2), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Frohberg, Klaus & Hartmann, Monika, 1997. "Comparing Measures Of Competitiveness," IAMO Discussion Papers 14879, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    15. Antoine, Partick A. & Taylor, Timothy G., 1993. "Nafta Or Not: Implications For Caricom Agricultural Competitiveness," 1993 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Orlando, Florida 271400, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. M. Hambalková, 2006. "The factors of competitiveness and the quantification of their impact on the export efficiency of grape and wine in the Slovak Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(8), pages 389-394.
    17. Tunahan Erdem, 2020. "Competitiveness of dried sector: A case study of world and Turkey," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(8), pages 365-372.
    18. Urba Svitlana & Senyshyn Oksana & Zamroz Marianna & Shparyk Yarema, 2023. "Assessment of Export Capacity of Agricultural Sector in the Context of International Competitiveness," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 45(1), pages 67-78, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ventaja comparativa revelada; intensidad importadora; complementariedad comercial; apuestas productivas; acuerdo comercial; competitividad;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B23 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Econometrics; Quantitative and Mathematical Studies
    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • D13 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Production and Intrahouse Allocation
    • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production
    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:018564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.