IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssb/154792.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Global Competitive Advantages and Overall Bilateral Complementarity in Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Scott, Linda
  • Vollrath, Thomas

Abstract

This report provides a time-series statistical overview of agricultural trade by the United States, 113 foreign countries, and principal regions. It also provides statistics for 15 agricultural industries. The authors present various economic statistics, including export and import shares, indexes of competitive advantage and disadvantage, correlation coefficients that summarize foreign traders' overall bilateral complementarity with the United States, and growth rates of these various statistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott, Linda & Vollrath, Thomas, 1992. "Global Competitive Advantages and Overall Bilateral Complementarity in Agriculture," Statistical Bulletin 154792, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssb:154792
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.154792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/154792/files/sb850.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.154792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Waqar Akhtar & M. Sharif & Hassnain Shah, 2009. "Competitiveness of Pakistani Fruits in the World Market," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 125-133, Jul-Dec.
    2. Urba Svitlana & Senyshyn Oksana & Zamroz Marianna & Shparyk Yarema, 2023. "Assessment of Export Capacity of Agricultural Sector in the Context of International Competitiveness," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 45(1), pages 67-78, March.
    3. Weindlmaier, H., 2000. "Die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der deutschen Ernährungsindustrie: Methodische Ansatzpunkte zur Messung und empirische Ergebnisse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 36.
    4. Gordeev, Roman, 2020. "Comparative advantages of Russian forest products on the global market," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Levkovych, Inna & Hockmann, Heinrich, 2007. "Transition and foreign trade: the case of the Ukrainian agri-food sector," 104th Seminar, September 5-8, 2007, Budapest, Hungary 7781, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. M. Bavorová, 2003. "Influence of policy measures on the competitiveness of the sugar industry in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(6), pages 266-274.
    7. Norashida Othman & Zulkornain Yusop & Mohd Mansor Ismail & Syamsul Herman Mohammad Afandi, 2021. "Energy Tax and the Downstream Palm Oil Trade Competitiveness Nexus in Malaysia: An Application of GMM Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 593-599.
    8. Losada, Oscar Hernán Cerquera & Gómez, Víctor Hugo Pérez & Chavarro, Jakeline Sierra, 2020. "Análisis de la competitividad de las exportaciones del café del Huila," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 21(2), pages 19-44, July.
    9. Glauben, Thomas & Hanf, Jon H. & Kopsidis, Michael & Pieniadz, Agata & Reinsberg, Klaus (ed.), 2008. "Agri-food business: global challenges - innovative solutions," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 46, number 92317.
    10. Lakner, Zoltan & Husti, Istvan, 2008. "The Necessity Of Strategic Thinking In Hungarian Agribusiness," Bulletin of the Szent Istvan University 47551, Szent Istvan University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences.
    11. Narayan, Seema & Bhattacharya, Poulomi, 2019. "Relative export competitiveness of agricultural commodities and its determinants: Some evidence from India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-47.
    12. Mashabela, T.E. & Vink, Nick, 2008. "Competitive performance of global deciduous fruit supply chains: South Africa versus Chile," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 47(2), pages 1-18, June.
    13. M. Hambalková, 2006. "The factors of competitiveness and the quantification of their impact on the export efficiency of grape and wine in the Slovak Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(8), pages 389-394.
    14. Fock, Achim & von Ledebur, Oliver, 1998. "Struktur und Potentiale des Agraraußenhandels Mittel- und Osteuropas," IAMO Discussion Papers 14, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    15. Antoine, Partick A. & Taylor, Timothy G., 1993. "Nafta Or Not: Implications For Caricom Agricultural Competitiveness," 1993 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Orlando, Florida 271400, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Fock, Achim & Ledebur, Oliver von, 1998. "Struktur Und Potentiale Des Agraraussenhandels Mittel- Und Osteuropas," IAMO Discussion Papers 14914, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    17. Frohberg, Klaus & Hartmann, Monika, 1997. "Comparing measures of competitiveness," IAMO Discussion Papers 2, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    18. Frohberg, Klaus & Hartmann, Monika, 1997. "Comparing Measures Of Competitiveness," IAMO Discussion Papers 14879, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    19. Tunahan Erdem, 2020. "Competitiveness of dried sector: A case study of world and Turkey," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(8), pages 365-372.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssb:154792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.