IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000152/019273.html

Acuerdos comerciales profundos y cadenas globales de valor: el caso de Chile, Colombia y Brasil

Author

Listed:
  • Julieta Zelicovich

Abstract

El trabajo analiza la influencia de la participación de un país dentro de las cadenas globales de valor en la adopción de acuerdos comerciales profundos. Para ello se combina el análisis estadístico con el estudio de caso para tres países latinoamericanos: Chile, Colombia y Brasil. Se sostiene que una participación elevada en los encadenamientos productivos globales puede resultar suficiente para explicar la firma de tales acuerdos, pero que no constituye un elemento necesario para la misma. Por el contrario, las variables político-ideológicas, como las orientaciones del modelo de desarrollo o la estrategia de inserción internacional, han sido tan o más importantes que la participación en las cadenas globales de valor para explicar el tipo de compromisos en materia de integración regional.

Suggested Citation

  • Julieta Zelicovich, 2019. "Acuerdos comerciales profundos y cadenas globales de valor: el caso de Chile, Colombia y Brasil," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 38(68), pages 81-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000152:019273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cenes/article/view/8808
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pol Antràs & Robert W. Staiger, 2012. "Offshoring and the Role of Trade Agreements," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3140-3183, December.
    2. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "New Technologies, Global Value Chains, and the Developing Economies," CESifo Working Paper Series 7307, CESifo.
    3. Mansfield, Edward D. & Milner, Helen V., 1999. "The New Wave of Regionalism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 589-627, July.
    4. Andreas Dür & Leonardo Baccini & Manfred Elsig, 2014. "The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 353-375, September.
    5. repec:ecr:col025:35879 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dür, Andreas & Baccini, Leonardo & Elsig, Manfred, 2014. "The design of international trade agreements: introducing a new dataset," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59179, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Edith Laget & Alberto Osnago & Nadia Rocha & Michele Ruta, 2020. "Deep Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 57(2), pages 379-410, September.
    8. Moravcsik, Andrew, 1997. "Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 513-553, October.
    9. Osgood, Iain, 2018. "Globalizing the Supply Chain: Firm and Industrial Support for US Trade Agreements," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(2), pages 455-484, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ka Zeng & Yue Lu & Ya‐wei Li, 2021. "Trade agreements and Global Value Chain (GVC) participation: Evidence from Chinese industries," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 533-582, November.
    2. Fatma Aly & Chahir Zaki, 2025. "On deep trade agreements, institutions, and global value chains: evidence from Egypt," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 161(1), pages 49-87, February.
    3. Carmen Díaz‐Mora & Erena García‐López & Belén González‐Díaz, 2022. "Bilateral servicification in global value chains and deep trade agreements," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 2510-2531, August.
    4. Andreas Dür & Lisa Lechner, 2023. "Winners and Losers From Trade Agreements: Stock Market Reactions to TPP and TTIP," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 200-211.
    5. Jacopo Timini & Nicola Cortinovis & Fernando López Vicente, 2022. "The heterogeneous effects of trade agreements with labour provisions," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9), pages 2820-2853, September.
    6. Kim, Dongin & Steinbach, Sandro & Zurita, Carlos, 2024. "Deep trade agreements and agri-food global value chain integration," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Jinlong Zhao & Yaqi Pang & Wenfan Gao, 2025. "A Research on the Sustainable Impact of FTA Strategy on the Global Value Chain Embedding of Listed Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Lee, Jiwon & Wittgenstein, Teresa, 2017. "Weak vs. Strong Ties: Explaining Early Settlement in WTO Disputes," ILE Working Paper Series 7, University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics.
    9. Hu, Xuhuan & Yu, Chunjiao & Sun, Yuchen & Zhao, Jiaqi, 2026. "Does the deepening of trade agreements promote bilateral value chain cooperation between China and ASEAN countries?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Alexander Jaax & Sébastien Miroudot, 2021. "Capturing value in GVCs through intangible assets: The role of the trade–investment–intellectual property nexus," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(3), pages 433-452, September.
    11. Stender, Frederik & Vogel, Tim, 2025. "What role for aid for trade in (deep) PTA relations? Empirical evidence from gravity model estimations," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    12. Sébastien Miroudot & Davide Rigo, 2022. "Multinational production and investment provisions in preferential trade agreements [Intra-industry foreign direct investment]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(6), pages 1275-1308.
    13. Andreas Dür & Lisa Lechner, 2023. "Winners and Losers From Trade Agreements: Stock Market Reactions to TPP and TTIP," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 200-211.
    14. Dhingra, Swati & Freeman, Rebecca & Mavroeidi, Eleonora, 2018. "Beyond tariff reductions: what extra boost from trade agreement provisions?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88683, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Zarlasht Razeq, . "Deep trade integration and North-South participation in global value chains," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    16. Haoyi Huang & Chunjiao Yu, 2026. "The Silk Road e-commerce cooperation initiative and the digital value-added trade between China and the BRI participating countries," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Berger, Axel & Bruhn, Dominique & Bender, Andrea & Friesen, Julia & Kick, Katharina & Kullmann, Felix & Roßner, Robert & Weyrauch, Svenja, 2016. "Deep preferential trade agreements and upgrading in global value chains: the case of Vietnam," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 92, number 92, May.
    18. Matteo Fiorini & Bernard Hoekman, 2022. "Correction to: EU services trade liberalization and economic regulation: Complements or substitutes?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 231-231, January.
    19. Kolcava, Dennis & Nguyen, Quynh & Bernauer, Thomas, 2019. "Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 98-112.
    20. Soo Yeon Kim, 2021. "Investment commitments in PTAs and MNCS in partner countries," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 415-442, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000152:019273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Luis Eudoro Vallejo Zamudio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cenes/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.