IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cjk/ojpscm/v4y2025i1p60-80id386.html

Advancing Supply Chain Efficiency Through Sustainable Procurement Practices: Evidence from Sachet Water Manufacturing Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Tonny Ograh

  • Andrews Osei Mensah

  • Evans Kyeremeh

  • David Asante

  • Samuel Brako

Abstract

Aim: This study examines the role of ethical procurement practices in enhancing operational efficiency, reducing costs, minimizing waste, and improving overall supply chain performance in the sachet water manufacturing industry. Methods: This study employed a descriptive, cross-sectional research design, utilizing primary data collected through a structured survey administered to 170 employees and managers from sachet water manufacturing firms. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS, incorporating descriptive statistics, correlation, regression, and reliability tests. The reliability of the constructs is confirmed by the high Cronbach's alpha values, with EP and OP showing a high degree of internal consistency at 0.833 and 0.865, respectively. In addition, a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.916 and a significant Bartlett's test (p < 0.05) confirm the excellent sampling adequacy and the construct validity, thus supporting the suitability of the data for factor analysis. Results: Correlation analysis highlights the significant role of ethical sourcing in driving operational performance, underscoring the importance of integrating sustainability into procurement strategies. Multiple regression analysis further identifies EP as a key predictor of operational performance, while non-significant predictors suggest areas for future research. Although multicollinearity is not a major concern, caution should be exercised when interpreting variables with higher variance inflation factors (VIFs). The normality of the residuals in the regression model is reasonably satisfied, reinforcing the reliability of the findings. Conclusion: The study concludes that prioritizing ethical procurement can substantially improve supply chain efficiency. Recommendation: These results provided actionable insights for practitioners to prioritize ethical sourcing practices to improve supply chain efficiency. They also provide a foundation for researchers to explore other operational performance drivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tonny Ograh & Andrews Osei Mensah & Evans Kyeremeh & David Asante & Samuel Brako, 2025. "Advancing Supply Chain Efficiency Through Sustainable Procurement Practices: Evidence from Sachet Water Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Global Peer Reviewed Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 60-80.
    • Handle: RePEc:cjk:ojpscm:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:60-80:id:386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gprjournals.org/journals/index.php/jpscm/article/view/386
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosaria E.C. Amaral & Joel Brito & Matt Buckman & Elicia Drake & Esther Ilatova & Paige Rice & Carlos Sabbagh & Sergei Voronkin & Yewande S. Abraham, 2020. "Waste Management and Operational Energy for Sustainable Buildings: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Timothy Bates & Joseph Farhat & Colleen Casey, 2022. "The Economic Development Potential of Minority-Owned Businesses," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 36(1), pages 43-56, February.
    3. Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph & Lai, Kee-hung, 2008. "Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 261-273, February.
    4. Seongtae Kim & Claudia Colicchia & David Menachof, 2018. "Ethical Sourcing: An Analysis of the Literature and Implications for Future Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1033-1052, November.
    5. Shubham & Parikshit Charan & L.S. Murty, 2018. "Secondary stakeholder pressures and organizational adoption of sustainable operations practices: The mediating role of primary stakeholders," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 910-923, November.
    6. Md. Mazharul Islam & Abalala Turki & Md. Wahid Murad & Azharul Karim, 2017. "Do Sustainable Procurement Practices Improve Organizational Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Daniel Etse & Adela McMurray & Nuttawuth Muenjohn, 2023. "Sustainable Procurement Practice: The Effect of Procurement Officers’ Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 525-548, May.
    8. Miriam Wilhelm & Veronica H. Villena, 2021. "Cascading Sustainability in Multi‐tier Supply Chains: When Do Chinese Suppliers Adopt Sustainable Procurement?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4198-4218, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vivian Osei & Disraeli Asante-Darko & Matthew Quayson, 2024. "Stakeholder Pressure, Circular Economy Practices, and Sustainability Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ecological Innovation Capabilities," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 3139-3170, December.
    2. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Kumar, V.N.S.A. & Kumar, V. & Brady, M. & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Simpson, M., 2017. "Resolving forward-reverse logistics multi-period model using evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 458-469.
    4. Mohsin Malik & Salam Abdallah, 2019. "Sustainability Initiatives in Emerging Economies: A Socio-Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Yuanzhi Xiao & Ruiqi Sun & Ke Gao, 2023. "Unleashing the mechanism between technological and behavioural aspects of green supply chain management: An environmental sustainability agenda," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(8), pages 2958-2975, December.
    6. Kalaivani Jayaraman & Sreenivasan Jayashree & Magiswary Dorasamy, 2023. "The Effects of Green Innovations in Organizations: Influence of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    7. T. William Lester & Matthew D. Wilson, 2023. "The Racial and Spatial Impacts of the Paycheck Protection Program," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(3), pages 243-258, August.
    8. Marco Valerio Rossi & Pasquale Sasso & Andrea Perna & Ludovico Solima, 2025. "Engaging marginal stakeholders on social networking sites. A cross‐country exploratory analysis among Generation Z consumers," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 155-173, January.
    9. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    10. Seles, Bruno Michel Roman Pais & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2016. "The green bullwhip effect, the diffusion of green supply chain practices, and institutional pressures: Evidence from the automotive sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 342-355.
    11. Jamalnia, Aboozar & Gong, Yu & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Sub-supplier's sustainability management in multi-tier supply chains: A systematic literature review on the contingency variables, and a conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    12. Dobos, Imre & Vörösmarty, Gyöngyi, 2014. "Green supplier selection and evaluation using DEA-type composite indicators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 273-278.
    13. Konstantinos Liagkouras & Konstantinos Metaxiotis, 2023. "Sources of Uncertainty and Risk Quantification Methods in Supply Chain Management: A Literature Study," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-42, December.
    14. Jens Heidingsfelder & Markus Beckmann, 2020. "A governance puzzle to be solved? A systematic literature review of fragmented sustainability governance," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 355-390, August.
    15. Wang, Zhen & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Liu, Chang, 2015. "Composite sustainable manufacturing practice and performance framework: Chinese auto-parts suppliers׳ perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 219-233.
    16. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    17. Kannan, Devika & Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta, 2014. "Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 432-447.
    18. Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y., 2012. "Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 267-282.
    19. Ifeoluwa Elemure & Hom Nath Dhakal & Michel Leseure & Jovana Radulovic, 2023. "Integration of Lean Green and Sustainability in Manufacturing: A Review on Current State and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    20. Zander, Katrin & Beske, Philip, . "Happy Growers! Relationship Quality in the German Organic Apple Chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cjk:ojpscm:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:60-80:id:386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://gprjournals.org/journals/index.php/jpscm/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.