IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v71y2018i21p03-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure of social housing policy: How to create affordable housing?

Author

Listed:
  • Friedrich Breyer
  • Nicole Hoffmeister-Kraut
  • Matthias Wrede
  • Harald Simons
  • Lars Vandrei
  • Theresia Theurl
  • Ralph Henger
  • Konstantin Kholodilin
  • Sebastian Kohl

Abstract

Living is becoming - at least in some cities - a luxury good, while affordable living space is turning into a scarce commodity. Housing policy must be drastically changed. Should social housing be expanded, the rent brake tightened or - on the contrary - both be largely abandoned? Should building regulations be relaxed and housing subsidies reformed and expanded instead? Friedrich Breyer, University of Constance, presents the report of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Federal Ministry of Economics and Energy on current housing policy. According to the report, the measures recently adopted are not suitable for eliminating the diagnosed "housing shortage" in a sustainable and social way. It would make more sense to allocate more building land in conurbations and to provide housing subsidies for households lacking the purchasing power to enable them to afford a flat at market rent. Nicole Hoffmeister-Kraut, Minister for Economic Affairs, Labour and Housing of the State of Baden-Württemberg, summarises the housing policy of the State of Baden-Württemberg, which among other things consists of the promotion of social housing and of freely-financed housing construction. Matthias Wrede, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, sees a social housing policy as securing a basic supply of housing, using space more efficiently and reducing transactions. According to Harald Simons, empirica, high rents affect less than half of the regional housing markets in Germany. High rents in one location are a result of low rents in other locations and vice versa. This is due to "swarm behaviour." The gap between swarm towns and bleeding regions could be narrowed if fewer young people were to migrate to swarm towns. According to Lars Vandrei, ifo Dresden branch, the rent brake does serve to reduce price increases, at least in the short and medium term. However, this does not create affordable housing, but merely makes existing housing more affordable for some tenants. Without an actual increase in supply, the scheme is primarily likely to benefit relatively high earners. Theresia Theurl, University of Münster, underlines the importance of housing cooperatives for the procurement of affordable housing. Ralph Henger, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft, sees the solution to the housing shortage problem in the expansion of the offer and the right mix of accompanying measures. Above all, the cities and municipalities in the conurbations would have to change their policies. The central problem is the lack of land available for development in growing cities and municipalities. Konstantin Kholodilin, DIW, Berlin, and Sebastian Kohl, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, show that rental regulations do not necessarily have to lead to the end of new construction activity; and that a deregulation of the rental market does not necessarily stimulate new construction activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Friedrich Breyer & Nicole Hoffmeister-Kraut & Matthias Wrede & Harald Simons & Lars Vandrei & Theresia Theurl & Ralph Henger & Konstantin Kholodilin & Sebastian Kohl, 2018. "Failure of social housing policy: How to create affordable housing?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(21), pages 03-30, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:71:y:2018:i:21:p:03-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2018-21-breyer-etal-sozialer-wohnungsbau-2018-11-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Gornig & Claus Michelsen, 2017. "Kommunale Investitionsschwäche: Engpässe bei Planungs- und Baukapazitäten bremsen Städte und Gemeinden aus," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 84(11), pages 211-219.
    2. Schier, Michael & Voigtländer, Michael, 2016. "Soziale Wohnraumförderung auf dem Prüfstand," IW-Trends – Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, vol. 43(1), pages 21-35.
    3. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Sebastian Kohl & Yulia Prozorova & Julien Licheron, 2018. "Social policy or crowding-out? Tenant protection in comparative long-run perspective," HSE Working papers WP BRP 202/EC/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Lars Vandrei, 2018. "Does Regulation Discourage Investors? Sales Price Effects of Rent Controls in Germany," ifo Working Paper Series 262, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    5. Konstantin A. Kholodilin, 2018. "Measuring Stick-Style Housing Policies: a Multi-Country Longitudinal Database of Governmental Regulations," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1727, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Mense, Andreas & Michelsen, Claus & Cholodilin, Konstantin A., 2017. "Empirics on the causal effects of rent control in Germany," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 24/2017, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    7. Theresia Theurl & Jochen Wicher & Christina Cappenberg, 2012. "Merkmale und Einschätzungen der Bewohner von Wohnungsgenossenschaften: eine Charakterisierung auf Basis des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 524, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    8. Lars Vandrei, 2018. "Does Regulation Discourage Investors? – Sales Price Effects of Rent Controls in Brandenburg," ERES eres2018_321, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    9. Thomschke, Lorenz, 2016. "Distributional price effects of rent controls in Berlin: When expectation meets reality," CAWM Discussion Papers 89, University of Münster, Münster Center for Economic Policy (MEP).
    10. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Andreas Mense & Claus Michelsen, 2018. "Mietpreisbremse ist besser als ihr Ruf, aber nicht die Lösung des Wohnungsmarktproblems," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(7), pages 107-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Vandrei, 2018. "Lars Vandrei," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 25(06), pages 12-15, December.
    2. Breidenbach, Philipp & Eilers, Lea & Fries, Jan Ludwig, 2019. "Rent control and rental prices: High expectations, high effectiveness?," Working Papers 07/2018, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.
    3. Raya, Josep Maria & Torres-Pruñonosa, Jose, 2022. "The importance of administrative data in the evaluation of the incidence of social housing allowance programmes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Sebastian Kohl, 2020. "Does Social Policy through Rent Controls Inhibit New Construction? Some Answers from Long-Run Historical Evidence," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1839, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    5. Lars Vandrei, 2018. "Does Regulation Discourage Investors? Sales Price Effects of Rent Controls in Germany," ifo Working Paper Series 262, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    6. Bofinger, Peter & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Wieland, Volker, 2018. "Vor wichtigen wirtschaftspolitischen Weichenstellungen. Jahresgutachten 2018/19 [Setting the Right Course for Economic Policy. Annual Report 2018/19]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201819.
    7. Konstantin A. Kholodilin, 2022. "Rent Control Effects through the Lens of Empirical Research: An almost Complete Review of the Literature," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2026, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Stephan L. Thomsen & Daniel Vogt & Lars Brausewetter, 2020. "Mietwohnungsknappheit in Deutschland: Ursachen, Instrumente, Implikationen [Shortage of Rental Housing in Germany: Causes, Instruments, Implications]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(6), pages 461-467, June.
    9. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Sebastian Kohl & Florian Müller, 2023. "Government-Made House Price Bubbles? Austerity, Homeownership, Rental, and Credit Liberalization Policies and the “Irrational Exuberance” on Housing Markets," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2061, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Lorenz Thomschke, 2019. "Über die Evaluierung der Mietpreisbremse [On the evaluation of the German rental price break]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 5(1), pages 21-36, November.
    11. Maximilian Schwefer, 2018. "Sitting on a Volcano: Domestic Violence in Indonesia Following Two Volcano Eruptions," ifo Working Paper Series 263, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    12. Thomsen, Stephan L. & Vogt, Daniel & Brausewetter, Lars, 2019. "Wohnungsmarkt und Wohnungspolitik in Deutschland: Situation und Optionen," IZA Standpunkte 97, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Gohl, Niklas, 2019. "House prices and spatial mobility: Lock-in effects on the German rental market," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203557, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    14. Guillaume Claveres & Thomas Y. Mathä & Giuseppe Pulina & Jan Stráský & Nicolas Woloszko & Michael Ziegelmeyer, 2020. "Housing and inequality: The case of Luxembourg and its cross-border workers," BCL working papers 144, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    15. Davies, Clementine, 2021. "Financialisation and rental housing: A case study of Berlin," IPE Working Papers 153/2021, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    16. Christian Dustmann & Bernd Fitzenberger & Markus Zimmermann, 2022. "Housing Expenditure and Income Inequality," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(645), pages 1709-1736.
    17. P. Reusens & Ch. Warisse, 2018. "House prices and economic growth in Belgium," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue iv, pages 81-106, december.
    18. Tomaso Duso & Claus Michelsen & Maximilian Schäfer & Kevin Ducbao Tran, 2021. "Airbnb and Rental Markets: Evidence from Berlin," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 21/746, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    19. Bricongne, Jean-Charles & Meunier, Baptiste & Pouget, Sylvain, 2023. "Web-scraping housing prices in real-time: The Covid-19 crisis in the UK," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB).
    20. Feld Lars P. & Reuter Wolf Heinrich & Yeter Mustafa, 2019. "Öffentliche Investitionen: Die Schuldenbremse ist nicht das Problem," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 292-303, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L85 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Real Estate Services
    • R21 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Housing Demand
    • R31 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Housing Supply and Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:71:y:2018:i:21:p:03-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.