IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v67y2014i21p03-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uber and Airbnb Models: Unfair Competition or a New Form of Sharing Economy?

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Brühn
  • Georg Götz
  • Martin Peitz
  • Adolf Rebler
  • Ulrich Schwalbe
  • Harald Heinrichs
  • Dieter Schlenker
  • Reinhard Loske
  • Katharina Dröge

Abstract

Airbnb and Uber are creating new markets with their business models. Are they optimising their use of resources or are they circumventing social standards and legal regulations? In the opinion of Tim Brühn and Georg Götz, University of Gießen, companies with large market shares like Google, Ebay and Amazon internalise the usage externalities between their client groups to a greater degree than platforms with a smaller number of customers. From an efficiency point of view, this is beneficial. At the same time, this dynamic reduces the competitive pressure between companies and potentially allows them to charge large price premiums. Martin Peitz, University of Mannheim, points out that new providers in a market must be prepared to abide by the rules that apply to everyone, and that states must be willing to amend existing regulations in line with changing framework conditions if necessary. For Adolf Rebler, Upper Palatinate government, the “modern models” constitute attempts to circumvent the legal regulations of the German Law on the Carriage of Passengers. For Ulrich Schwalbe, University of Hohenheim, it would seem sensible to annul obsolete regulations and replace them with rules that guarantee a sufficient degree of security and service quality. Harald Heinrichs, University of Lüneburg, sees great potential in the sharing economy’s ability to make a contribution to sustainable business. In his opinion, it is the role of politics, business and society to develop appropriate conceptual and regulatory approaches. For Dieter Schlenker, Genossenschaft Taxi Deutschland, the profits from transporting persons are being privatised via Uber, while the related risks are being inflicted on society. Reinhard Loske, University of Witten/Herdecke, argues that European and national competition laws are need to ensure that the sharing economy does not develop purely into the domain of the internet giants and is not ruled by their interests and profit margins. Katharina Dröge, MP, Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, considers Uber and AirBnb to be good ideas. However, both companies must prove that their business model is not entirely based on the exploitation of unfair competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Brühn & Georg Götz & Martin Peitz & Adolf Rebler & Ulrich Schwalbe & Harald Heinrichs & Dieter Schlenker & Reinhard Loske & Katharina Dröge, 2014. "Uber and Airbnb Models: Unfair Competition or a New Form of Sharing Economy?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(21), pages 03-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:67:y:2014:i:21:p:03-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2014_21_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang Guo & Tian Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2014. "Strategic Information Sharing in Competing Channels," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(10), pages 1719-1731, October.
    2. Schneidewind, Uwe & Palzkill-Vorbeck, Alexandra, 2011. "Suffizienz als Business Case: Nachhaltiges Ressourcenmanagement als Gegenstand einer transdisziplinären Betriebswirtschaftslehre," Zukunftsimpulse 2, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frederik Plewnia & Edeltraud Guenther, 2017. "Advancing a sustainable sharing economy with interdisciplinary research [Der Beitrag interdisziplinärer Forschung zu einer nachhaltigen Sharing Economy]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 117-124, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Klöckner & Christoph G. Schmidt & Stephan M. Wagner, 2022. "When Blockchain Creates Shareholder Value: Empirical Evidence from International Firm Announcements," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 46-64, January.
    2. Karoline Augenstein & Alexandra Palzkill, 2015. "The Dilemma of Incumbents in Sustainability Transitions: A Narrative Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Posse, Dirk, 2015. "Zukunftsfähige Unternehmen in einer Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Eine theoretische und empirische Untersuchung," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 110257, July.
    4. Wei-Shiun Chang & Daniel A. Sanchez-Loor, 2020. "Downstream Information Leaking and Information Sharing Between Partially Informed Retailers," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 733-760, December.
    5. V. Kumar & Alok R. Saboo & Amit Agarwal & Binay Kumar, 2020. "Generating Competitive Intelligence with Limited Information: A Case of the Multimedia Industry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 192-213, January.
    6. Dongyan Chen & Chunying Tian & Zhaobo Chen & Ding Zhang, 2022. "Competition among supply chains: the choice of financing strategy," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 977-1000, April.
    7. Felix Ekardt, 2017. "Grenzen des Nachhaltigkeitsmanagements in interdisziplinärer Perspektive [Limits to sustainability management in an interdisciplinary perspective]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 33-41, June.
    8. Yan, Yingchen & Zhao, Ruiqing & Lan, Yanfei, 2017. "Asymmetric retailers with different moving sequences: Group buying vs. individual purchasing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 903-917.
    9. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Consumer taste uncertainty in the context of store brand and national brand competition," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    10. Avinadav, Tal & Levy, Priel, 2022. "Value of information in a mobile app supply chain under hidden or known information superiority," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    11. Barlow, Euan & Tezcaner Öztürk, Diclehan & Revie, Matthew & Akartunalı, Kerem & Day, Alexander H. & Boulougouris, Evangelos, 2018. "A mixed-method optimisation and simulation framework for supporting logistical decisions during offshore wind farm installations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 894-906.
    12. Christa Liedtke & Katrin Bienge & Klaus Wiesen & Jens Teubler & Kathrin Greiff & Michael Lettenmeier & Holger Rohn, 2014. "Resource Use in the Production and Consumption System—The MIPS Approach," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-31, August.
    13. Zhu, Haoruo & Ni, Yaodong & Yang, Meng & Song, Qinyu, 2023. "Blessing or curse? Impact of incomplete information in a networked cournot competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Li Jiang & Zhongyuan Hao, 2016. "Incentive-Driven Information Dissemination in Two-Tier Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 393-413, July.
    15. Song Huang & Shuting Chen & Lei Xiao, 2020. "Manufacturer product quality information disclosure with channel encroachment in the E‐commerce age," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(5), pages 744-761, July.
    16. Tong, Yang & Lu, Tao & Li, Yina & Ye, Fei, 2023. "Encroachment by a better-informed manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1113-1129.
    17. Guan, Zili & Zhang, Xumei & Zhou, Maosen & Dan, Yiran, 2020. "Demand information sharing in competing supply chains with manufacturer-provided service," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    18. Cai, Jianhu & Sun, Haining & Shang, Jennifer & Hegde, Gajanan G., 2023. "Information structure selection in a green supply chain: Impacts of wholesale price and greenness level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 34-46.
    19. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Brand positioning and consumer taste information," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01_R1, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 04 Dec 2017.
    20. Zheng, Shiyuan & Ge, Ying-En & Fu, Xiaowen & (Marco) Nie, Yu & Xie, Chi, 2020. "Demand information sharing in port concession arrangements," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 118-143.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • L50 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:67:y:2014:i:21:p:03-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.