IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v54y2001i17p11-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Überlegungen zur mittelfristigen Entwicklung des elektronischen Handels

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Schedl

Abstract

Die Wachstumsaussichten des elektronischen Handels werden von vielen Faktoren bestimmt, die nur zum Teil von den Unternehmen beeinflusst werden können. Dazu gehört, neben der Investition in Hardware und Programme, vor allen Dingen der erhebliche Zusatzaufwand für Lernen, Standardisierung, Kommunikation, Beratung und organisatorische Anpassung innerhalb des Unternehmens. Befragungen des ifo Instituts zeigen, dass die für die automatische Abwicklung des elektronischen Handels notwendigen innerbetrieblichen Infrastrukturen bei der Mehrzahl der Unternehmen noch nicht in ausreichendem Umfang vorhanden sind. Zentrale Kundendatenbanken z.B. waren im Durchschnitt nur bei etwa 11 % der befragten Betriebe zu beobachten. Zwar liegen vergleichbare Daten für die USA nicht vor, Experteninterviews lassen jedoch annehmen, dass die Situation dort ähnlich ist. Angesichts der Entwicklungsdefizite ist deshalb trotz der stetigen Weiterentwicklung, mit einem Boom des elektronischen Handels in den nächsten Jahren nicht zu rechnen.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Schedl, 2001. "Überlegungen zur mittelfristigen Entwicklung des elektronischen Handels," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(17), pages 11-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:54:y:2001:i:17:p:11-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2001_17_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack High (ed.), 2001. "Competition," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1751.
    2. Hans Schedl & Horst Penzkofer & Heinz Schmalholz, 2001. "Anwendungshemmnisse beim Einsatz integrierter luK - Technologien im Kontakt mit dem Kunden," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(05), pages 22-29, August.
    3. Hans Schedl, 2001. "Wo steht der elektronische Handel in Deutschland?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(06), pages 27-33, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Symeonidis, George, 2001. "Price Competition, Innovation and Profitability: Theory and UK Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 2816, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005. "The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis," Working Paper Series 3847, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    3. John Roemer, 2005. "Distribution and politics: a brief history and prospect," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 25(2), pages 507-525, December.
    4. Burke, A.E. & van Stel, A.J. & Thurik, A.R., 2009. "Blue Ocean versus Competitive Strategy: Theory and Evidence," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-030-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Haufler, Andreas & Pflüger, Michael, 2003. "Market structure and the taxation of international trade," Discussion Papers in Economics 106, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    6. Tisdell, Clem, 2003. "Socioeconomic causes of loss of animal genetic diversity: analysis and assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 365-376, July.
    7. Michele Cincera, 2005. "Firms' productivity growth and R&D spillovers: An analysis of alternative technological proximity measures," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(8), pages 657-682.
    8. Thisse, Jacques-François & Pieretti, Patrice & Zanaj, Skerdilajda, 2011. "Tax havens or safe havens," CEPR Discussion Papers 8570, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Tarsila Segalla Afanasieff & Priscilla Maria Villa Lhacer & Márcio I. Nakane, 2002. "The Determinants of Bank Interest Spread in Brazil," Money Affairs, CEMLA, vol. 0(2), pages 183-207, July-Dece.
    10. Bonaccorsi di Patti, Emilia & Gobbi, Giorgio, 2001. "The changing structure of local credit markets: Are small businesses special?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(12), pages 2209-2237, December.
    11. Boadway, Robin & Cuff, Katherine & Marceau, Nicolas, 2003. "Redistribution and employment policies with endogenous unemployment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 2407-2430, October.
    12. Zissimos, Ben & Wooders, Myrna, 2005. "Relaxing Tax Competition through Public Good Differentiation," Economic Research Papers 269630, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    13. Eduardo Levy Yeyati & Christian Daude & Ernesto Stein, 2002. "The FTAA and the Location of FDI," Business School Working Papers diecisiete, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.
    14. Andrea Attar & Eloisa Campioni & Gwenaël Piaser & Uday Rajan, 2012. "Competing mechanism games of moral hazard: communication and robustness," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 16(4), pages 283-296, December.
    15. Minogue, Martin, 2008. "What connects regulatory governance to poverty?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 189-201, May.
    16. De Donder, Philippe & Roemer, John E., 2009. "Mixed oligopoly equilibria when firms' objectives are endogenous," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 414-423, May.
    17. Pradeep Dubey & John Geanakoplos & Martin Shubik, 2005. "Default and Punishment in General Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 1-37, January.
    18. Emmanuel Bretin & Stéphane Guimbert & Thierry Madiès, 2002. "La concurrence fiscale sur le bénéfice des entreprises : théories et pratiques," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 156(5), pages 15-42.
    19. Norback, Pehr-Johan & Persson, Lars, 2004. "Privatization and foreign competition," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 409-416, March.
    20. Camille Cornand & Frank Heinemann, 2009. "Speculative Attacks with Multiple Sources of Public Information," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 111(1), pages 73-102, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:54:y:2001:i:17:p:11-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.