IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cdh/commen/530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Uncertainty: The Search for a Golden Discount-Rate Rule for Defined-Benefit Pensions

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart Landon

    (University of Alberta)

  • Constance Smith

    (University of Alberta)

Abstract

This Commentary examines how the choice of a pension plan discount rate affects the tradeoff between the risk of holding insufficient assets to pay promised benefits and the cost of acquiring more assets. The choice of discount rate can have a dramatic effect on the value of a plan’s liabilities and, therefore, the assets needed to meet plan obligations. When assessing the performance of different discount rate rules, it is crucial to recognize the unpredictable nature of pension plan assets and obligations. In a fantasy world of no uncertainty and where the discount rate is equal to the rate of return on pension plan assets, the value of a fully funded plan’s projected liabilities equals the value of actual future plan benefit payments. Such a plan will, as a result, be able to pay the pension benefits promised and have no excess assets. However, in a realistic world of uncertainty, the expected pension payouts, projected at the time when contributions are made, may differ significantly from actual future pension payments due to, for example, unanticipated inflation when pension benefits are indexed. Furthermore, asset returns are unpredictable and often volatile, so yields on plan assets may differ greatly from expected returns. As a consequence, the assets accumulated by the plan can differ markedly from the assets required to meet actual future payments. A key innovation of our analysis is that, through the use of simulation methods, we observe the performance of a wide range of discount rates under equivalent movements in plan obligations and asset returns. We analyze six discount rate types, or rules, and assess each rule’s success in meeting the competing objectives of minimizing the accumulation of excess assets and ensuring a high probability that future benefit obligations are met. The choice of a discount-rate rule depends on the relative importance attached to these two factors. If approximately equal weight is given to achieving these two objectives, the best performing rules are a 10-year moving average of the high-quality corporate bond yield and an inflation forecast supplemented by a constant real interest rate. Both of these rules yield average discount rates below the expected rate of return on assets, but higher than the riskless rate of interest. Our results indicate there is considerable risk associated with choosing a relatively high pension plan discount rate, such as the expected return on plan assets. However, many pension plan sponsors in Canada prefer this rate, which they argue keeps their pension plans affordable. Current employers and employees have an incentive to keep the discount rate high in order to reduce current contributions, but a higher rate increases the probability that the plan will have insufficient assets to meet obligations. This suggests there is a need for prudent regulation of pension plan discount rates. Public-sector pension plans receive little guidance on the choice of discount rate and, in practice, many such plans use a rate higher than our best performing rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart Landon & Constance Smith, 2019. "Managing Uncertainty: The Search for a Golden Discount-Rate Rule for Defined-Benefit Pensions," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 530, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_530.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Novy‐Marx & Joshua Rauh, 2011. "Public Pension Promises: How Big Are They and What Are They Worth?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(4), pages 1211-1249, August.
    2. Freeman, Mark, 2013. "Pension Plan Solvency and Extreme Market Movements: A Regime Switching Approach †Abstract of the Leeds discussion," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 681-694, September.
    3. Abourashchi, Niloufar & Clacher, Iain & Hillier, David & Freeman, Mark & Kemp, Malcolm & Zhang, Qi, 2013. "Pension Plan Solvency and Extreme Market Movements: A Regime Switching Approach – Funding Report for the Actuarial Profession," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 676-680, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Retirement Saving and Income; Public Pension Plans; Public Sector Employment Costs; Workplace Pensions;

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kristine Gray). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.