IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Pourquoi s'intéresser à la notion d' « evidence-based policy » ?

Listed author(s):
  • Catherine Laurent
  • Jacques Baudry
  • Marielle Berriet-Solliec
  • Marc Kirsch
  • Daniel Perraud
  • Bruno Tinel
  • Aurélie Trouvé
  • Nicky Allsopp
  • Patrick Bonnafous
  • Françoise Burel
  • Maria José Carneiro
  • Christophe Giraud
  • Pierre Labarthe
  • Frank Matose
  • Agnès Ricroch

From the early 1990s “evidence-based medicine” (EBM) was formalized to promote the most judicious use possible of available knowledge by practitioners, the word “evidence” referring simultaneously to factual evidence, empirical corroboration, and proof. The tenets of EBM spread to other decision-making spheres (poverty-abatement policies, law, education, environment...) resulting in the notion of “evidence-based policy” (EBP). In the French-speaking world, increasing reference to EBP is often dismissed as an insignificant effect of rhetoric or an attempt to depoliticize debate. But an analysis of its origins suggests a more nuanced judgement. It rather shows the will to renew positive approaches to help public decision-making through an arsenal of ad hoc methodologies. In particular, EBP approaches contribute to counterbalance the increasing use of knowledge models based exclusively on opinions or simulations that relieve themselves from empirical validation.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

Article provided by Armand Colin in its journal Revue Tiers Monde.

Volume (Year): n° 200 (2009)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 853-873

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cai:rtmarc:rtm_200_0853
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Raghabendra Chattopadhyay & Esther Duflo, 2004. "Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(5), pages 1409-1443, 09.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rtmarc:rtm_200_0853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.